The Pros And Cons Of The CAMM Model

604 Words3 Pages

I agree with your assessment that the ISTA framework is more congruent with the readiness for change quiz in Lorenzi and Riley (2004) than the FITT framework. In a previous post I addressed the sociotechnical issues and unintended consequences; therefore, I decided to take a look at the CAMM model, this readiness for change quiz and the Kaiser project as a whole. I will admit that when we were discussing the frameworks in a previous unit, I was drawn more to the FITT and the ISTA frameworks and did not really delve into the CAMM model much; however, after rereading Price and Lau (2014) the four dimensions of the CAMM model appear to fit well with the readiness quiz and have the potential to guide a HIT project from quiz through implementation and beyond. …show more content…

This dimension could fit with processes/functions, direction, and decision-making in the readiness for change quiz (Lorenzi & Riley, 2004). As previously discussed, Kaiser used MyHelp and Pathways to Proficiency to train user access (Poorsina, Vilardi, & Eytan, 2011). In a press release in 2007, Kaiser proudly reported that their system availability averaged 99.2%, just a few tenths of a percent off the goal of 99.7% availability. Bornstein (2012) discusses how providers began to use the content to better manage their patients. Kaiser achieved the first dimension of CAMM