ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Citizens United States

433 Words2 Pages

The synopsis of the Citizens United case is that there cannot be a ban on a speech given based on the corporate identity of the speaker. This law was aimed at Senator Hillary Clinton who was receiving funds from for-profit organizations. As for Citizens United, this is a nonprofit organization that has a 12 million dollar budget. They came up with a 90 minute documentary in order to keep people from voting for Hillary Clinton. President Obama actually condemned the ruling in his 2010 state of the union address. The 5-4 decision was a win for the first amendment, the freedom of speech. This keeps the government from trying to regulate political speech, but this does not keep the political parties from being corrupt from the corporate money. This case overruled two cases before it. …show more content…

It could also free interest groups from depending on one particular political party. More activist and other groups can have their voices heard without being affiliated with a major political party. It could also keep a good mixture of candidates in the local races. All Americans will have different ways to get their voice heard through free speech no matter who the speaker is. There are also cons to the ruling. The ruling gives more power to the conservatives so that they can use every trick in the book so that they can try to remain in power over the government. This is leading towards then using more propaganda and election fraud. Politics is judged by who has the most money wins. I think that we should but an end to the corporate takeover of the government. They keep attacking workplace safety regulations and they assault the workers unions. Looks like that they are trying every little move to block any relief that the middle class have left for relief from the corporate owners. This take over by corporate America will eventually end the American Democracy as we know

Show More
Related

Pros And Cons Of The ACLU: American Civil Liberties Union

377 Words | 2 Pages

In our world today we have many facilities, organizations, and unions but a controversial one today is the ACLU which stands for American Civil Liberties Union. According to http://action.aclu.org. For almost 100 years the ACLU has worked to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed by the constitution and laws of the U.S. The ACLU is a non-profit organization. They have worked hard to change policies and help America in many situations.

Read More

Whitney Vs. Californi Case Study

509 Words | 3 Pages

They ruled that the 1st amendment did not guarantee ultimate freedom of speech and anyone violating the government could be overthrown by the state. The historical impact that the case was made mostly from Justice Brandeis, who stated that immediate serious and evil threats should be the only ones that are taken seriously enough to strip away someone’s granted rights. Brandeis’s opinion was put to use in 1969 when the case of Brandenburg v. Ohio, which is when the court overruled the decision. Yes, there are laws to help protect the natural-born citizens of this country, but if they can be taken and maneuvered to make sure the courts get what they want, why have

Read More

United States Vs. Miller Case Study

1959 Words | 8 Pages

This case is also regularly cited in other Supreme Court cases and is often a deciding factor. It has been used in cases like Konigsberg v. State Bar “That view, which of course cannot be reconciled with the law relating to libel, slander, misrepresentation, obscenity, perjury, false advertising, solicitation of crime, complicity by encouragement, conspiracy, and the like, is said to be compelled by the fact that the commands of the First Amendment are stated in unqualified terms: "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble . . . . " But as Mr. Justice Holmes once said: "[T]he provisions of the Constitution are not mathematical formulas having their essence in their form; they are organic living institutions transplanted from English soil.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Super Citizens United Vs Fec

2369 Words | 10 Pages

In the past few years, the United States has seen a huge spike in the money spent in federal elections (See Appendix 4.B). Not only have candidates been making greater efforts to communicate their ideas to the American public, but super PACs have also been displaying their support for candidates and their political policies; they do so by using their right to accept unlimited donations from the public and later, use that money to promote certain candidates, or to sway voters in a desired direction. The immense power that super PACs have to sway voters has come under harsh criticism, spurring the creation of new laws and limits on the super PACs in an attempt to keep them in check and to avoid possible corruption. These limits on super

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Citizens United Vs Fec

345 Words | 2 Pages

Based on the articles detailing opposing viewpoints about Citizens United v. FEC, the Supreme Court’s decision is positive in the aspect of protecting free speech, and attempting to involve more citizens in political discussions. However, the decision does limit who possesses the most impact when participating in these conversations. Some aspects of Citizens United v. FEC support fundamental principles outlined in the constitution. Such that during the case “The government argued in Citizens United that it had the power to outlaw books and movies produced by unions and corporations, both non-profit and for-profit, if they included even a single line addressing an election or a political issue”(Dick 11).

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Citizens United Vs Fec

1445 Words | 6 Pages

However, the group was prevented from doing so: because prior to the ruling, doing so would violate a federal statute that prohibits the use of advertisements to promote or discriminate against any candidate in an election. But because the First Amendment prevents the making of any laws preventing people from practicing Free Speech, the Supreme Court eradicated this federal statute; this made all political ads legal, regardless of nature. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell stated after the decision “With today’s monumental decision, the Supreme Court took an important step in the direction of restoring the First Amendment rights of these groups by ruling that the Constitution protects their right to express themselves about political candidates and issues." (McConnell v. FEC) For this reason, many believe that overturning the Citizens United ruling would be unconstitutional and by doing so would the Supreme Court would be limiting Freedom of

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Sovereign Citizens

95 Words | 1 Pages

“Sovereign citizens believe they are self-governing and not under the authority of any government. They also believe they are subject only to common law or constitutional law and are not bound to obey statutory law.” (Police Chief) Sovereign Citizens do not pay taxes, collect social security or pay traffic tickets.   their preferred method of terrorism is paper terrorism, but there have been cases of violence mostly involving police officers. According to a survey in 2014 85% of state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies agreed that Sovereigns were the biggest threat to America (RT International)

Read More

How Did O Brien Lose His Drafting Card In Protest

995 Words | 4 Pages

I believe this case applies to the Criminal Justice Field because with all the protests and things being said it’s hard to really know when is the breaking point or the point where you take action. For example, if someone tweets “I hate all lunch ladies” and then decides to burn a lunch lady hat, is that person still protected under the first amendment? It’s ultimately a hard question to answer when you are stuck between what is right and what is wrong. Chief Justice Warren said, “We cannot accept the view that an apparently limitless variety of conduct can be labeled "speech" whenever the person engaging in the conduct intends thereby to express an idea” which I agree with today, in the justice field, we see quite a few cops being threatened but you cannot just shoot a cop and yell I did it to express my first amendment rights. Without this case, the criminal justice field would not have a diverse way of amending certain situation involving the first amendment also we would not have the O’Brien test.

Read More

How Did Bacon's Rebellion Contributed To The American Revolution

830 Words | 4 Pages

No longer could a corrupt government censor anyone who spoke out against them. The power to criticize the government was moved to the people with this court case, and the open discussion of the government was created. This leads to democracy in the idea that the people have rights, and a right to talk about one’s own government force the government to cater to the people, a core component of the idea of a democracy. Also, this case leads to the people, with the press, being somewhat involved in the decisions of government by being able to speak out about their opinions on the actions of the power. If the people were not able to speak their mind about their own government, the general population would not have any influence on their own government, therefore not resembling a democracy at all.

Read More

'Citizens United V. FEC' By Richard Epstein: Article Analysis

1235 Words | 5 Pages

FEC,” he addresses the idea that Citizens United has many developed aspects to it; the case is arguing that Citizens United “does not involve cartel or monopoly practices, or abuse of children, or any of the other traditional exceptions to First Amendment protection.” However, Epstein also addresses that corporations are not citizens and cannot vote. But many people still ask: if corporations are not citizens and cannot vote, why are they protected under the First Amendment? This protection under the First Amendment gives corporations and unions rights that states do not have the power to overrule; businesses, essentially, have more power and more sway in their opinions. Epstein is very objective when presenting the issues of this case; however, he considers this power political corruption because the First Amendment does not protect the use of money, which means that “anyone who uses money to obtain assistance in preparing for political speech has crossed over the line into potentially criminal conduct.”

Read More

Why Was Texas Vs Johnson Important

1605 Words | 7 Pages

There are many stakes when it comes to very important cases that could change a person’s life forever. The individual right at stake was his freedom of speech. His rights and freedoms were tampered with which led to this being a major court case. The public’s good could’ve been at stake by being injured due to his action

Read More

The Pentagon Papers Case

337 Words | 2 Pages

This case highlighted the First Amendment condemning any limit on free speech. However, during the case proceeding, the Court had dissents for deciding when the government may restrict the First Amendment. The case spread the fact that

Read More

Essay On Campaign Finance Reform

494 Words | 2 Pages

The case was initially brought forth when the lobbying group, Citizens United, aired a film relating to, at the time, Presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton. The film was very critical of Clinton, and was said to be in violation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, Section 203. This section prohibits “electioneering

Read More

Freedom Of Speech In Debs V. United States

1197 Words | 5 Pages

The Supreme Court has been entrusted with the task of interpreting the Constitution of the United States. In the First Amendment of the Constitution, freedom of speech serves as the foundational liberty which is the cornerstone to the practice of democracy. Commencing at the early part of the twentieth century cases such as Schenck v. United States, Debs v. United States, Abrams v United States, Whitney v. California, and Dennis v. United States, paved the way for the Court to set the legal standard for defining protected and unprotected speech. Nonetheless, the Court has struggled to interpret said boundaries property and has failed to protect speech in some of the above cases. This essay will analyze two different scenarios where the Court

Read More

The Orthopraxy: The Doctrine Of The Trinity

231 Words | 1 Pages

The doctrine of the Trinity explains several parts of both our orthodoxy as well as our orthopraxy. Frankly, there are many things that we do now (and have done for most of Christian history) that do not make any logical sense without it. Prayer is does not line up logically without both a Holy Spirit as well as a Father. How else could we believe that our words would ever be sufficient for the Creator? Romans tells us that the Holy Spirit intercedes and becomes the interpreter between us and the Father.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Citizens United States

Related Topics

Open Document