The outcome of presidential elections in the US is decided by the unusual Electoral College system. The system works on a winner-takes-all basis, wherein all of a state’s electoral votes go to the candidate who earns the majority of those votes. Over the years, this method has received both positive and negative feedback. Critics claim it can result in an unjust distribution of power and resources, while supporters claim it guarantees a balance of power between big and small governments. The benefits and drawbacks of the Electoral College, as well as how it affects our democratic process, will be discussed in this essay. The winner-take-all format serves as another justification offered by some advocates for doing away with the Electoral College. In this system, every state’s electoral votes go to the candidate who earns the most votes in that state. This may result in a situation where some states have an excessive amount of influence over how the election turns out. The Electoral College system’s swing state emphasis results in an uneven distribution of resources and attention across the nation. Candidates focus most of their attention on swing states, where there is uncertainty about the …show more content…
Individual votes have a proportionally bigger impact on the distribution of electoral votes with lower populations, which raises equity concerns. From looking at document A, you can see states like Wyoming, Idaho, South Dakota have only 3 Electoral College votes. Voters in more populated states may feel disenfranchised as a result of this, since their votes are essentially diluted. When the election system is not truly reflecting the will of the people, the idea of “one person, one vote” appears to be undermined. As a result, this gap casts doubt on the Electoral College’s fairness and its capacity to accurately reflect the democratic choice of the entire