The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College

1607 Words7 Pages

In November of 2012, Donald Trump would tweet arguably one of the most ironically true statements he has ever articulated: “The electoral college is a disaster for democracy!” Although he didn’t know it then, Donald Trump’s position on the Electoral College would soon change. Following election day in November of 2016, Donald Trump was elected the 45th President of the United States despite losing the general election to Hillary Clinton by over 2.8 million votes. He did, however, win the Electoral College by 74 votes; winning with a system he had once looked at with disdain. Trump’s presidential victory has reignited debate over whether the country should continue to utilize the Electoral College. This vexing system is not an easy one to change and erasing it completely from our political system has complex and serious consequences. To add to the …show more content…

This way, electors are still awarded, and a candidate still must reach 270 to win the presidency. However, these electors are not won on a winner-take-all basis. Instead, they’re awarded by Congressional district. The idea is that in a solidly red or solidly blue state, there are huge pockets of voters in the minority party who make up entire districts but who never have a say in the election result. Recent data from the Office of the Federal Register reported that in 2012, over 3 million Texans voted Democratic, and almost 5 million Californians voted Republican. This system would give these pockets of voters a voice, as districts would become candidates’ target rather than states. A Republican would normally ignore a state like Maine because it’s firmly Democratic and know that would have no chance of winning it. With the congressional district method, however, they can visit a district that leans Republican and appeal to those voters, therefore not ignoring the voices of millions just because those voices are in the state’s