ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Jury System

711 Words3 Pages

Some may say that we should get rid of the Jury System others say to keep it. The Jury system is instrumental to our legal system in a variety of ways, as such I am in favor of keeping the jury system. Our government's Judicial system lets the defendant choose between a trial by jury and bench trial, so why should we get rid of something if we already have the option. We should keep the jury system because we should stick to the Bill of Rights, ensure our citizens can self-govern, and maintain the option to choose the desired trial type. On December 15, 1791 the United States of America made the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is made up of the ten amendments and the seventh amendment gives us the right to a trial by jury. Our founding fathers put a lot of forethought into the intricate system of the government. If we were to stop doing the jury system then the rest of our government would be impacted tremendously. When the founding fathers made the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, they made the documents interconnected. In the background essay it discusses a time when the king made a special court where only the royal judges made decisions. When our country was founded on these documents, a trial by jury system was put into place to prevent unfairness in the court where people of high positions influenced …show more content…

Document C states “Observers of the American jury system have remarked on its ability to elevate ordinary citizens into self-governors…”. When called upon, it's the citizens civic duty to be a juror. When a citizen gets an ID or a drivers license they are automatically put into the pool of jurors. The people get to play their part in the government system which allows average people to make a huge difference to highly known individuals. This system allows everyone to play apart in the judicial branch of the

Show More
Related

Jury System DBQ Essay

515 Words | 3 Pages

The Founding Fathers wanted the people of the United States to be in a democracy or self-government and established the jury system into the constitution. It is expensive and is a long process to start a jury trial. Also, jurors are not as professional as judges and can not determine a fair verdict. The Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) effect might also affect the verdict of the jury. The American jury system should not be used because of it not being cost-effective, the lack of experience of the jury, which leads to justice not being served, and the CSI effect impacting the

Read More

When Was It Called The Constitutional Convention Of September 17, 1787

1474 Words | 6 Pages

On September 25, 1789 the Bill of Rights was added with the Ten Amendments and finally proposed on December 15,1791. Before all this had happened there had been the Constitution by the government. The Constitution was just the guidelines and the rules that

Read More

Jury System Dbq Essay

1122 Words | 5 Pages

Over the years, a plethora of court cases have caused Americans to wonder: is our jury system indeed as wondrous as it is conceived to be? To explain, the jury system is the concept of giving the defendant in a trial the option of either having a bench trial, one where a judge alone reaches a verdict, or a trial by jury, one where a group of twelve ordinary citizens is chosen to reach a verdict on the case. One may wonder why a dozen everyday denizens are being endowed with the absolute power over a possibly life or death decision in the life of a neighbor that is unknown to them, but the framers of the United States Constitution believed that this was the most democratic option in making sure that justice is properly served. Explaining further,

Read More

Jury Nullification Research Paper

125 Words | 1 Pages

Critics try to counter by saying that jury nullification is a bad method because juries are not experienced and trained as police and prosecutor are. The thing is though juries are useful exactly because they are not trained to know the law. They are a common sense point of view because they are not affected by restricting law. Such a common sense point of view is necessary to properly balance the rule of law with the fair application of justice—because a purely legal approach made by lawyers and judges can often result in harsh results. That is why it is important to have another party whose views can be different from judges and lawyers to have the power to counter the wrongness made by them.

Read More

Jury System Dbq

842 Words | 4 Pages

Is the American Jury System still a Good Idea? In the American Judicial System today, there is a choice between trial by jury or bench trial. Trial by jury is used today by selecting jurors from pools of people who are eligible, adult American citizens. Trial by jury is often controversial because of how the jurors are not professionals whereas in a bench trial, a judge is highly educated in law (Doc B).

Read More

Compare And Contrast Declaration Of Independence And Bill Of Rights

705 Words | 3 Pages

On December 15th, 1791 the bill of rights was ratified and became a part of the now-complex U.S. constitution. The amendments in the bill of rights dictate laws

Read More

Should Citizens Be Required To Serve On A Juror Essay

647 Words | 3 Pages

However they are wrong because some people will not take it serious as it need to be. Citizens should not be required to serve on jury because bias jurors. For example, in the play “Twelve Angry Men” during the deliberation of the verdict some of the jurors showed bias toward the young man on trial because of where he was from. “We 're not here to go into the reasons why slums are

Read More

Should Jury Trial Still Be An Option Essay

585 Words | 3 Pages

Only 0.58% of cases get sent to trial by jury. A jury is a group of 12 men or women that have to make the decision in the case after listening to the whole case. They sit in a cramped box to try to reduce distractions. The reality is that they don't really pay attention and mess up the outcome a lot of times. Is the American Jury System Still a Good Idea?

Read More

Flawed Jury Essay

705 Words | 3 Pages

A flawed jury is what makes for an unfair trial. Juries are a crucial piece of the puzzle which helps create the system we have today, one where it needs to be represented in the right way that makes the justice system an improved one. The judicial system is one where the jury needs to accurately represent the community that the accused resides in, achieving this can impact the community first hand, make it easier to protect the defendant from unfair sentencing, and promote public confidence in the justice system which is what lots of people distrust and lack in. The citizens in a community are the ones that get impacted from the actions of accused in the first hand which is why they need to be accurately shown in the jury.

Read More

Essay On First Ten Amendments

462 Words | 2 Pages

In the late 1700’s, James Madison wrote the first Ten Amendments that are listed in the United States Constitution. The Bill of Rights were written to ensure American citizens that they have freedoms and rights that the government can 't infringe. Out of the Ten Amendments, I believe that the First and Eighth Amendment are the most significant. The First Amendment grants us freedom of speech, religion, press, petition, and for people to assemble peaceably.

Read More

Disadvantages Of Juries In NSW

188 Words | 1 Pages

While there are many advantages of juries in criminal trials in NSW, there are also many disadvantages. As people in juries are normal, everyday people, they may not be able to fully comprehend legal documents or any sort of forensic evidence. The fact that they are normal people can also effect what information is disclosed by the jury, as they may not know what information to disclose or keep to themselves. The Jury Act 1977 (62) states that is prohibited to supply false or misleading information to the sheriff in a case. Each person in the jury may have their own personal biases, specifically racial, which effects the overall outcome of a trial.

Read More

Justice In 12 Angry Men

729 Words | 3 Pages

The last danger to the justice system is jurors on the jury duty have no common sense to figure out the truth behind cases. One example is in the play “Twelve Angry Men” juror 10 says about juror 8 “ He’s a common ignorant slob. He don’t even speak good English” (Rose 326)! Then juror 11 corrects juror 10 saying “He doesn’t even speak good English” (Rose 326). Also anyone that is a United States citizen and of the age of 18 is allowed to be called to be on jury duty.

Read More

Jury Should Be Abolished Essay

894 Words | 4 Pages

If the US does consider abolishing the trial by jury and permanently replace it with trial by the bench, then it would be best to get the opinion of the citizens first before taking action. Some citizens may have some idea what the difference is between trial by jury and trial by the bench and some don’t, so it would be best to inform them of its differences. A trial by jury consists of twelve people from the community, the job of the jury is the come to a decision if the witness is found to be guilty or innocent and the judge decides the law. But for the verdict to be decided all twelve jurors must agree on the same decision, and if only one still does not believe the witness to be guilty or innocent then the other jurors must have to convince

Read More

12 Angry Men Interview Analysis

1139 Words | 5 Pages

No. 8: I think that the jury system we have today has its own advantages and disadvantages. For example, a jury that consists of jurors who are biased could be manipulated by ‘outsiders’ through bribery or some jurors, as we have discussed before, might have some personal prejudices/beliefs that may affect their decision making. But there are some advantages as well because the decision that is made by the jury is thought out very carefully by a group of people. Interviewer: [gathers all his papers]

Read More

Trial By Jury Advantages And Disadvantages

1472 Words | 6 Pages

They have to decide important matters, verdicts, without giving reasons about their decision (Hostettler, 2004); they can nullify a verdict even if the evidence is overwhelming (Joyce, 2013). Furthermore, juries are too expensive, prolong the length of the trial (Davies, 2015) and the guilty can walk free, while the innocent is convicted (Joyce, 2013). In addition, jurors should be representative of society, but it is not

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Jury System

Related Topics

Open Document