Before the bias is created, all forms of media have to seek and search an event such as President Trump’s Travel Ban 2.0. The revised travel ban still has original parts of the original ban. Compared to the original ban, it is a 120 day travel ban to aliens coming to the United States. Also, it is a 90 day ban for visas for travelers coming into the United States. However, the revised ban has new rules compared to the original ban. For example, the original rules are implemented towards the six countries of Syria, Iran, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. Also, the rules also apply towards aliens looking for visas otherwise if travelers are legal Americans or if travelers have their visas and or greencards already approved, they are free to travel …show more content…
The administration has stated that these are the “countries of concern”. It was a response to the public’s reaction of previous version which it was perceived as discrimination towards all Muslims. As a result, the Supreme Court banned the original travel ban due to the fact that it was unconstitutional. According to Boston Globe’s online article Travel Ban 2.0: What’s different ?, Trump responded to the Court, “If the ban were announced with a week notice, the ‘bad’ would rush into our country during that week. A lot of bad ‘dudes’ out there”. Trump and his administration disagreed with the views from the court. As a response, Trump and his administration revised and redesigned a new a travel ban. Compared to any event in recent memory, the media world sparked debates and sparked different points of view. As there is any event in the Media, including the Travel Ban 2.0, there will be bias especially in media networks such as CBS, CNN, and Fox News. In CBS’s Face the Nation , when asked about his thoughts about the travel ban, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie showed a liberal point of view when he elaborates that the ban was presented in a disrespectful and harmful matter. However, he mostly displays a conservative