ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Roman Republic

774 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Eassy on the roman military

The Roman Republic was somewhat meeting the common good. The reason why the Roman Republic was not meeting the common good was because it did not treat everyone fairly that made people in rome feel sad. The Roman Republic did not meet the common good from education,citizenship,services,laws,and trade this made them for not meeting the common good. In democracy it is important the they meet everyone 's needs.
Providing public services Grade: B-
When it came to providing public services the Roman Republic earn an B-. The reason it earn an B- is because romans would kill each other. They also had a lot of bloody sports. In Rome the roman roads were built for the soldiers so they could march quickly from place to place. But sometimes soldiers would often worked on the roads when they are not fighting. In rome the aqueducts were built only to carry the flow of water in areas where digging burrowing or surface grades presented problems such as valleys.
Protect rights Grade: B
When it came to protect rights the Roman Republic earn an B. The reason it earn an B because in rome all the people had either no citizenship, limited citizenship,or full citizenship. If you had full citizenship one of your …show more content…

The reason it earn an A because the soldiers were protected with their gear that help them with wars and other stuff. The legions were the basic unit of the roman army. Each legion had from 4,500 to 5,000 heavily armed soldiers. A maniple was a unit of between 60 to 160 soldiers. Roman soldiers were builders as well as fighters. A roman soldier would carry a shield,short sword,and a spear. Rome gained power with the help of its allies. The treaties required allies to send troops to fight alongside the romans in their campaigns.The roman army was made up of 30 legions or over 150,000

Show More
Related
1182 Words | 5 Pages

But the Romans did not have any planning and that is why the empire grew weaker and weaker. The soldiers did not know how to fight anymore and were badly injured because of the decision to not wear armor. The Roman military was no match to some other armies but most importantly the Huns, a group that exceeded the rate of which they conquered everything in their path. They are very tough and will not back down without a challenge. Document D describes the Huns, ”Fired with an overwhelming desire for seizing the properties of others, the Swift moving and ungovernable people make their destructive way amid the pillage and slaughter of those who live around them” The fall of Rome is Attributed to invasions and Military break down because of this very purpose, there was finally a group that could overtake and overpower the army.

Read More
893 Words | 4 Pages

This was a bad decision because it caused inflation. Another economic reason why the Roman Republic failed was because of taxes. The poor made up a large percentage of the Roman population. The government became oppressive and started to force everything on the people. Roman leaders came up with the forced labor which made peasants work on fields, roads, and bridges.

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

Tiberius and Gaius strived to better Rome as a whole, which separated themselves from the rest of the

Read More
931 Words | 4 Pages

Romans were also not beasts for not participating in government unlike the Athenians who punished them. In document D it also states that they were “ ranked into distinct classes” which shows that they were put together and had their priorities straight. In document F it states “ senate had full governing power in Rome” which is better than in Athens where everyone kinda ruled, Rome was more of a democracy. This evidence all helps to show that Rome was better when it came to citizenship because they were more thought out and not all

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic lasted from 509 B.C.E to 27 B.C.E. The Roman Republic was democratic, but not always. Such as when the wealthy took over, it was more difficult to become a Roman citizen, and there was a lot of division in the society. However it was still democratic because they let the majority of legal men vote, even the free slaves later on, the people had a voice, and everyone mainly had a job to do in order to help the community. The Roman Republic tried to be democratic, but then it led to it just being an aristocracy.

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

The values of the Roman republic, included rule of law, upright moral behavior, the rights of citizens, and a political system that offers some protection to the lower class. The Rome army also helped the city become a success because it was drawn from the growing population of Italy and was renowned for being well trained, well fed, and well rewarded. This showed the people around the city that the Roman republic cared for everyone and was very straight forward about what they expected in their city. 6. How & why did the making of the Chinese empire differ from that of the Roman Empire?

Read More
448 Words | 2 Pages

2a. The Romans' considerable generosity in granting citizenship was one reason why their system was superior to Athens. 2b. Document A shows how the Roman Republic, unlike Athens, was fairly generous in granting citizenship and the different requirements the nation had for being a citizen. For example, it shows that in Rome, anyone but slaves who fit the requirements could be citizens, while in Athens, no one but free, native-born adult males were granted citizenship.

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

Within itself, it consisted of 60-80 million people. Rome had a better system than Athens because of their process of citizenship, their citizens’ contributions society, and amazing government system. Unlike Athens, the Roman Republic granted citizenship for all free native-born adults and children. Document A shows us that Athens only accepted free, native-born adult males as citizens. Some may argue that they were more protective,

Read More
809 Words | 4 Pages

Luke Robinson Mrs. Morgan English 4 4/30/2018 Censorship in Ray Bradbury’s novel “Fahrenheit 451” Books, poems, and other literature works alike get your mind out of the shadows. They get you thinking and sometimes your mind can be a powerful weapon. Weapons on a global scale can be a dangerous thing and often countries ban these tools of destruction for fear that they could hurt the population. Through the use of figurative language and satire, Ray Bradbury in his novel Fahrenheit 451 presents his readers with a dystopia based on censorship, similar to how weapons are banned. Fahrenheit 451 is During the time when Ray Bradbury was creating Fahrenheit 451 the cold war was occuring.

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

Citizenship : Why Athens was the Better System Athens was a small city compared to Rome that honored and protected citizenship. There was a constant importance of acknowledging all citizens hard work and participation. Athenians made it clear that the poor helped build the city 's power and not just the wealthy. They took politics very seriously and made sure that everyone had a voiced opinion. Hard work and equality is what makes a nation outstanding.

Read More
913 Words | 4 Pages

“Why did the Roman Republic fall?” The Roman Republic did not fall simply from one cause, rather many external pressures that brought on political instability and destruction. There were multiple pressures that lead to the downfall of Rome including ambitious generals, changing politics, client armies, and a desolate Senate desperate to remain prominent. Many significant people of the time, who wrote letters and speeches on ancient Rome, help to build detailed recollections of the political warfare that took place between 78-31BC.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

It seems that the fall of the Roman Republic was not a singular event that occurred instantaneously, but rather a long process that saw the increasing use of methods outside of Republican institutions to settle conflicts between members of the aristocracy over political power. Even as the Roman government transitioned form Kingdom to Republic and then to Empire, the competition between aristocratic families remained a relative constant in across the centuries. So too has the desire to mythologize the past. The romans attributed both the fall of the Kingdom of Rome and the fall of the Roman Republic to moral rot, while a more reasonable assessment might place the blame on a dissatisfied and competitive elite class and an inefficient and unresponsive governmental system that was unwilling or unable to address their concerns. In much the same way, modern observers of the Roman Republic have tended to mythologize the fall of the Republic in the service of creating a moral narrative about the unconscionable tyranny of Cesar and the righteousness of the Senate, or whatever alternative narrative is befitting of the historical moment and audience.

Read More
817 Words | 4 Pages

So because of the Roman soldier being replaced by German mercenaries and the stoppage of expansion the Roman military lost its power. When the invasions of the western tribes came and destroyed Rome, there was nothing they could

Read More
1045 Words | 5 Pages

The Roman government met the needs of the public services by providing many advanced, and secure items for the Roman citizens. The grade I gave was an A-. The reason why will be supported. First, the Roman Government provided a secure water system throughout the city. There were public baths for citizens to rinse off in.

Read More
1645 Words | 7 Pages

The Roman Empire left a mark on history as one of the largest and most successful empires in history. How much territory did the Roman Empire rule over? At the Roman Empire’s pique, the Empire engulfed the entire Mediterranean and spread all across Western Europe and half of Great Britain.   The Roman Empire was not taken likely by rival empires.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Roman Republic

Related Topics

Open Document