Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Us constitution history essay
2nd amendment
Us constitution history essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Us constitution history essay
2nd amendment
Us constitution history essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Back in the early days of independant America there had been an ethical dilemma on whether or not they should ratify The U.S constitution. The main two arguments were whether citizens chose to maintain the status quo, or switch to a more centralized government. The two debates were backed up by James madison who wrote the Federalist No.10 for ratification and Patrick Henry who gave a speech against it. In the document James warns about how “there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party, or an obnoxious individual.” referring to someone or a group of people who could possibly create unique factions between on another and disrupt a potential republic.
At the time that the Constitutional Convention took place, the North was industrialized and produced many finished goods. The South, however, still had an agricultural economy. Therefore, the South imported many finished goods from Britain. The North wanted the government to be able to impose import tariffs or taxes on finished products. They wanted this to help protect against foreign competition and encourage the South to buy goods made in the North.
1. Personally, I believe the constitution was the better document because it had more power. The articles of confederation gave the states more power than congress had, and because of this states either did was it said or did not. Because of the states having more power over Congress, the states did not focus on the needs of the whole country but only cared for their own state and what is best for their people. The constitution is better because it was easier to make changes and amendments to it.
Before ratifying the Constitution, a constitutional convention was called in 1787 to change the Articles of Confederation. This meant that each state had only one vote in Congress, and the size didn’t matter. The debate was between the federalists and Anti-Federalist, one side wanted to ratify the constitution and the other side didn’t. It was not easy because there were documents and articles both supporting and going against it. Who are the federalists?
The young nation, barely three years old, was dying. Ten years after the Declaration of Independence, America was struggling to hold itself together. The Articles of Confederation, designed during the Revolution, demolished even the inkling of monarchy by forcing the national government to abide by the whim of the states. During the Revolutionary War the states held together out of necessity, but after the war, the states became hostile to their neighbors. It quickly became evident that a serious crisis has settled upon the United States.
The Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia, on May 25, 1787. Most of the delegates were from the upper classes of American society. The most famous delegate, George Washington, was “unanimously elected president” of the Convention (Cassel, 1994. P. 119). Originally, the delegates intended to revise the Articles, however their debates resulted in a whole new constitution.
The United States Constitution has created much debate since the moment it was conscripted. It has been argued that Constitution of the United States is a document that was drafted in response to the evolution of society. Others have argued that the creation of the Constitution was made as an effort to create a strong national government that was capable of exercising real authority and preservation of ideals in the revolution. The American Constitution is seen as being reactionary because the founders of the Constitution wanted to react to change in restoration of the previous state. The U.S. Constitution is considered reactionary because one should consider the events, documents, and people who participated in the era of the Constitution.
Addressing the secession of many southern states, Lincoln said “It is safe to assert that no government proper ever had a provision in its organic law for its own termination.” The U.S. could not be legally broken up. The Constitution does not allow for such a form of divide. The U.S. already tried operating as separate states in the form of the Articles of Confederation. An attempt like that has already been made, with little success.
The new constitution couldn’t please everyone. Some people liked it but some didn't. The two sides were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were in favor of ratifying the Constitution, whereas the Anti-Federalists were opposed to it. They would have debates about ratifying the Constitution.
History is written by the victors, is a common saying used to describe the inequality of information available from different viewpoints of an issue. This idea holds true when it comes to the United State’s Constitution. For years, American students are taught all the positives of the document with little attention to the negatives. But those against the ratification of the Constitution, the Anti-federalists, had valid issues with the Constitution, some of which are still relevant almost 230 years in the future. The Constitution, legally speaking, shouldn’t even have been created.
These past few years have been some troubling ones. Since the revolution and the ratification of the Articles of Confederation our country has been in a state of limbo. For every step forward our country attempts to make, we end up taking a giant leap back to where we began. Recently, our founding-fathers have taken part in a convention and have began discussing the idea of a new constitution- a new way of structuring our government. This constitution, however, has been lacking in support from some very crucial states due to the lack of a Bill of Rights, which would address the individual rights of a citizen.
Similarly, the Declaration of Independence by Jefferson proclaimed that all men are created equal and entitled to certain inalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Both men recognized that without freedom and equality, individuals are unable to fully participate in society and achieve their full potential. In “The Declaration of Independence,” Jefferson writes, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Thomas Jefferson in particular wrote the Declaration of Independence, which stated “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
The Best Constitution The United States’ constitution is one of the most important documents in history. It lists our rights and privileges as citizens of the US, states the role of government, and contains all of the laws we use today. These things-and more- make it an extremely well-written document. It is strongly revered by historians and regular people alike.
In The Declaration of Independence, Jefferson states, “We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit