ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Two Atomic Bombs

601 Words3 Pages

Petrified for their lives, taking cover, saying goodbye to loved ones, buckets of tears, innocent people slaughtered. World War two was violent, brutal, homicidal, and just downright horrifying. Japan and the United States had been at war for four years from December 7 1941 to 9145 before the final bombs were dropped. The two atomic bombs were dropped from pearl harbor on December 7, 1941, and 15 days later Japan surrendered. To end the horrific ongoing crisis, Truman made a thought-through decision to allow the two bombs to be dropped. Although over fifteen hundred thousand individual’s lives were shattered, after the two final atomic bombs were dropped, when Japan surrendered millions of lives were saved, the Soviet Union had been intimidated into leaving Japan alone, and the war was no longer prolonged after four whole years of horror. …show more content…

Radiation was a big factor in the Japanese cities bombed; many people were burned or at least affected by the radiation from the bombs, “15 - 20 % died from injuries or illness attributed to radiation” (Document 8) people were seriously injured or died later in life from radiation poisoning. The long-term effects of the radiation were leukemia, cancer, and lung problems. Because of the radiation, well after the war had ended people were still very much affected. Imagine if Truman didn't drop the atomic bombs and ended the war, there would be even more suffering from many sources that would have affected even more

Show More
Related

Pros And Cons Of Truman And The Use Of Atomic Bombs

642 Words | 3 Pages

But he had no compelling reason to do so. The bomb provided a promising way to bring about a prompt Japanese surrender without the disadvantages of other alternatives, and in Truman’s mind, its use did not require a lengthy consideration” (Walker pg. 96). After the bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, people decided that the bombs were actually required. The people thought that if the bombs weren’t dropped, thousands of American lives would have died while America invaded Japan. The problem with this logic is that many people died in those bombings.

Read More

How Did Truman Use The Atomic Bomb Dbq

301 Words | 2 Pages

As stated in document A, President Truman believed that it was his duty as president to use every weapon available to save American lives. By making the decision to employ atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it successfully brought an end to World War II. Now, while these bombs did ultimately spare thousands of American lives, it did also put an end to about 200,000 lives as shown in document E. Document A stated that Admiral William Leahy, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, opposed using the bomb because it killed civilians indiscriminately. He believed that an economic blockade and conventional bombing would convince Japan to surrender. As an opposite end of the spectrum though Truman’s advisor, James Byrnes thought that the use of “the A-bombs would not only cause Japan to surrender, but also impress the Soviet Union, and hopefully stop its expansion” (Doc C).

Read More

Truman Dbq

651 Words | 3 Pages

As soon as Truman took oath as 33rd president of the United States, within the six months of his presidency, he ended the World War 2 by attacking on the Japan with the nuclear weapons and destroyed two of cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki completely. This was bold yet wrong decision taken by the Truman as still the human and animal generations of the two afflicted countries are suffering from the hazardous radioactive effects. Not only had this in order to get down the Soviet Union, Truman committed for the assistance of the US troops in South Korea against the North Korea, but due to the Japanese assistance to the North Korea with its troops, Truman strategy went in vain (Editors,

Read More

To What Extent Was Truman Justified In Dropping The Atomic Bomb

608 Words | 3 Pages

WWII-Atomic Bomb Thousands and thousands of kids, families gone in seconds from one bomb that was ordered to hit the enemy forces by the United States president. The U.S had a tough decision to make when fighting the second world war and when the first know thing was made called the atomic bomb. The question is, was president Truman justified in dropping the two atomic bombs and killing thousands of lives in a blink of an eye to end the war? Truman wasn’t justified in dropping the bomb because of all the lives that had to be sacrificed. If he just stuck to the original plan and kept going from island to island then maybe less lives would of been taken.

Read More

Why We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Dbq

985 Words | 4 Pages

So, Truman made the difficult but necessary decision to drop the first atomic bombs. The mass destruction caused the Japanese to realize that they had already lost the war, and they needed to give up. All in all, the action taken by President Harry S. Truman was the right decision because it ended the war and saved American soldiers’

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

856 Words | 4 Pages

By dropping the atomic bomb it ended the war and saved Americans lives. In document J the estimated total casualty of Japanese people was estimated to be 199,000 people that is to the estimated 1 million American casualties if we kept fighting until the Japanese surrendered. Also, in document I it says “His (Truman’s) advisors had warned him to expect massive casualties if the United States invaded Japan.” Truman didn’t do it out of revenge he did it out of protection for American lives. In document A it says “It was their (committee of top men) recommendation that the bomb be used against the enemy as soon as it could be done.”

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

565 Words | 3 Pages

The decision to drop atomic bombs was not just a strict military measure to to force japan to unconditionally surrender, but was a diplomatic measure to intimidate the Soviet Union.

Read More

How Did Truman Decided To Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

530 Words | 3 Pages

These lives of innocent civilians were lost on top of countless amount of people who were affected by radiation. No matter how good their reasoning for using these types of weapons, President Truman should not have used them. An argument to drop the atomic brom, from a military standpoint, is that using these weapons could put America superior over other nations. Dropping these atomic bombs would make other countries fear the United States army. With other countries fearing the United States, that could result in Americans being more safe, because no country would want to mess with our military.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bombs

504 Words | 3 Pages

It could roughly save 30 million people Ground invasions Dropping the Bombs The decision to use the Atomic Bomb affected the way individuals like Truman perceived the war. Even though Harry Truman’s decision affected the way the war turned he did think of how the bomb will affect Japan and its civilians. Which made me think that he did create a way to stop the war which is why, I would also believe in dropping the bombs. President Truman had three options which did make him perceive the way he will fight, 1 to continue bombing Japanese cities, 2 to invade Japan, and 3 demonstrate the bomb on an unpopulated island or an inhabited Japanese city.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

806 Words | 4 Pages

“Lewis estimates that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to the extent that it induced Japanese surrender, saved the lives of roughly 30 million people” (Dr. Daniel McIntosh). In the press release announcing the dropping of the atomic bomb Truman made a statement that would strongly support the dropping of the bomb. He states, “We have used it to shorten the agony of the war, in order to save the lives of thousands of young Americans.” World War 2 was an agonizing war that America helped. On Top of saving American lives, lives of all nationalities were saved with the end of the

Read More

To What Extent Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq

687 Words | 3 Pages

The final decision to drop the atomic bomb was left to President Harry S. Truman. If the bomb was not dropped, it is believed that the war would have gone on for about four more years. Truman once said, “We have used it to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans''(Doc. I).

Read More

Should Trumans Be Allowed To Make Timely Decisions?

1112 Words | 5 Pages

However, it is also true that the bombs led to Japan’s surrender, saving countless lives that would have been lost in a land invasion or continued war. Critics may say that Truman’s decision was unnecessary, as Japan was already on the brink of surrender. However, this argument ignores the fact that Japan had not officially surrendered and there was a significant resistance within the Japanese military to surrender. It also fails to consider the potential consequences of a land invasion, which would have been devastating for both American and Japanese forces. In other words, Truman’s decision to drop the bombs was also criticized for its humanitarian consequences.

Read More

Essay On President Truman's Decision To Drop The Bomb

2354 Words | 10 Pages

1.0 Introduction World War Two was a long and arduous war which saw the deaths of over fifty-four million people. It was between the Allied and Axis powers but as is often the case in wars, it took its toll on civilians. The American and Japanese were continuing their war well after the war in Europe ceased, and as a result they were running low on supplies and losing troops on both sides. This brought upon a weapon of mass destruction that was used by Harry Truman (the President of the United States at the time), to bring a swift end to the war against Japan. However this decision still has the public divided and debating over the ever timely question; was President Truman justified in his decision to drop the bomb?

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombs

532 Words | 3 Pages

Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay There had been many debates about whether the U.S. should or should not have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan. Well, in my opinion, I think that the U.S. should not have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan and there are two reasons why not. One reason why the U.S. should not have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan is because there were other alternatives of what they could’ve done. Another reason why the U.S. should not have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan is because the use of the atomic bombs was inhumane.

Read More

Hiroshima Bombing Argumentative Essay

797 Words | 4 Pages

The US used the A-bomb to save its soldier, which could have been lost. Japan planning to surrender to the Russian but only if there can keep their emperor making The atomic bomb pointless. With many military leaders on point, agreeing that dropping the atomic bomb was unnecessary. Only president Truman could have made the choice to try to save American lives but in saving them, he will be kill millions of innocent people. Imagined being in President Truman shoes try to make the choice of whether or not to press the big red

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Two Atomic Bombs

Related Topics

Open Document