ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Tyranny

891 Words4 Pages

Tyranny has been an enemy of many countries throughout the years. It is an unethical and oppressing form of government where one person, or group of people, comes into control over an entire population. Before gaining independence, America was under a monarchy, which at the time could easily have been compared to a tyranny. The founding fathers wanted to make sure we did not fall under the rule of one person, so they created the Articles of Confederation. Unfortunately, the Articles had many problems and missed many essential key components needed for a successful country. The founders reframed the articles, thus creating the Constitution of today. The Constitution guarded against tyranny with Federalism, Separation of Powers, Checks …show more content…

For instance, as found in various sources, some individual and shared powers that the central and state government have: States can establish schools and hold local elections while the central government can declare war and conduct foreign relations, they both have the power to tax and enforce laws. Splitting the powers between the two distinct governments allowed the states to be independent in themselves, yet also, keep the country United. If the states were to control themselves with no central government, each state would act as their own country, causing problems in the nation and dividing everyone. However, if there was only a central government ruling over the nation, the country would fall under a tyrannical rule because there would be no individual freedom within the states and everyone would be under one government’s …show more content…

Putting checks and balances into the constitution not only deepens the segregation between the branches but also limits each branch’s power using a system. In James Madison’s Federalist paper #51 he states that he wanted the branches to check each other, “the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on each other…. [The three branches] should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” The framers manage to implement this so that no branch of government could be more powerful than another. For example, the chart adapted from various sources, including the Constitution of the United States of America, states that the legislative branch can impeach judges and remove them from office, but the judicial branch can declare laws proposed by Congress unconstitutional. Without this system, tyranny would control our country, and power in the government would be unequal in more ways than

Show More
Related
236 Words | 1 Pages

The second guard against tyranny was separation from powers, which is why we have three different government branches. In order for them not to have tyranny,

Read More
647 Words | 3 Pages

What I mean by that is if the executive branch didn’t like something that the judicial branch was doing they could off a change or a different solution. So to make a long story short these branches weren’t completely separate. Written in Federalist Paper #51 it states that “The three branches should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” (Doc C) I also think that when Madison said that “The different governments will each control each other, but at the same time they each will also control themselves.”

Read More
358 Words | 2 Pages

Does the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? “Tyranny and anarchy are never far apart’. Tyranny is a cruel, aggressive government or rule there are many sorts of tyranny. Separation of Powers are branches that do not have power over each other when they are separated it creates an equal government. Small states and large states help with votes in each senate this is determined by the population of the state.

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

“The different governments will each control each other at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” (Doc A, Madison,James, Federalist Paper 51, 1788). Each part of the government had there own jobs to do, for example the central government has the power to regulate trade, conduct foreign relations, provide an army and navy, while the state government set up local governments, holds elections,

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

This is evident in document A, where it shows you a Venn diagram of which powers are given to the states and which powers are given to the federal government. For one thing, this shows how “a double security arises to the rights of the people”, which means that when the power is distributed between the states and the federal government, neither is able to gain absolute power over the country. Federalism also comes in handy by specifying what the states get to control and what the national government gets to control, which is meant to prevent conflict between the two powers. For example, the task of declaring war is meant for the national government only. If that wasn’t specified, there would likely be a lot of cases where states declared war, and the national government had to clean up the mess.

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

took to secure us from tyranny is called Federalism. Madison's concept of dividing the power between center all and state governments is known as federalism. Controls that are required to run a nation are given to the central government, for example, Declaring war and coining money. Also controls that are required for a state are given, for example, holding decisions, and making in-state laws. Powers that are required by both states, and the government law are shared.

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

The Judicial Branch is the judge of any laws that the President or Congress passes, they decide if the law goes along with the Constitution. Without this system our government would fall into a complete disaster and most likely become a dictatorship. Given these points, it is obvious that the power in our government needs to be

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

“The constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check in the other.” (Federalist Paper #51) (Doc C) The branches had some control of each other, so they can’t overpower each other. This helped balance the power so one branch doesn’t become an overpowered beast compared to the other branches.

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism breaks apart the powers given to the central (Federal) government and those powers given to the states. As seen in document A1, a source from James Madison from Federalist Paper #51, 1788; Madison states, “In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments, and the portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments.” This idea from Madison is the idea of the division of power between the Federal Government and State Governments. Federalism provides a “Double security,” that protects the rights of the citizens of the United States of America. As the governments will be controlled by itself, the separate governments will also control each other.

Read More
529 Words | 3 Pages

To protect it’s people from tyranny the Constitution uses federalism, separation of powers, and checks and balances. An important tool the Constitution uses is Federalism to share power. Federalism is when a country has a compound government, which includes a central government and state governments. James Madison explains that power will be divided between the central government and state governments; the said power will then be split between discrete departments.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

Avoiding A Tyranny As I'm heading to the king's room with his dinner,praying that he would enjoy it.i walk past the guards and into his room while he was sitting there and waiting and i come forward lay his food in front of him and watched him take the first bite he spit it back out and called in the guards into the room to chain and to take me to a cell. Back when a tyranny ruled all he would treat his people unfair,and and if it was possible to have a government without having him/her with all power to themselves ,then the framers of the constitution avoided a tyranny by using Federalism,Separation of power/ checks and Balances and small large state compromise. The first idea of avoiding a tyranny it was Federalism, the point if it was dividing the power into two departments of power which was the department of powers given to the central government and the other was powers given to the states,but there was still a problem one side still had too much power,which meant they

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

The system of checks and balances that were developed by the creators of this document prevents any one part of the government from gaining too much, or absolute power. With the construction of the legislative, executive, and the judicial branch it greatly changed how the government runs by dividing the government into three branches, giving each branch equal power over each other. Votes were based on equal representation within each state so smaller states would have an equal say as much a larger state. Creating a more fair government that regulates not only the people but the government itself was critical to the success of the

Read More
487 Words | 2 Pages

The Checks and Balances are the ways that the three branches of government check each other to make sure each one doesn’t go crazy with power. Legislative Branch checks the Judicial Branch, Judicial Branch checks the Executive Branch, and the Executive Branch checks the Legislative Branch. (Document C). This helps guard against tyranny because each of the branches can check the other one to make sure the branches don’t get too much power. The final way that the constitution helped guard against tyranny was the Big States and Small States Compromise.

Read More
1015 Words | 5 Pages

This essay will be explaining the ways in which tyranny was a good thing for Greek states across the Mediterranean during the 6th, 5th, and 4th centuries BC. In the first instance, What tyranny is and how some of the Greek States were, in general, before tyranny will be explained. Additionally, examples of two tyrants from two different locations will be discussed. Finally, why and how tyranny came to be seen as a bad thing will be discussed. Tyranny

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore, power has been justly distributed between each division of government. Checks and balances are yet another form of separation of powers in the government. As the Constitution was initially written, there were checks and balances preventing any one branch of becoming too powerful. Since we still follow the same Constitution (with a few amendments) those checks and balances are still used.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Tyranny

Related Topics

Open Document