A commonplace situation is the general public simply being in the wrong place at the wrong time, and more often than not, a clear example of this is a bank robbery. The stakes are high enough with the punishment and lengthy prison time hanging over any failed robbery, which may then prompt the criminal to question or push their principles aside, for those committing the crime to warrant someone's selfish best interest of escape, success or survival over a lump of porridge, they then cast aside the criminal code as it no longer serves their need. So what would the outcome be if an innocent bystander was simply drawing out a few quid from their local bank and before you could say, "everyone on the ground now!" when a team of hooded armed to the …show more content…
The discharging of shotguns, screaming, shouting and carelessly destroying property is just for the movies. Never has a plan been executed with the intention or thought of involving or harming Joe public, this would not benefit the money getters agenda. Villains seek at all times to avoid collateral damage or a delay in getting the job done, they are not on overtime, nor do they get a bonus for letting guns off, or making a racket. There are of course internal laws and rules dictating the well-being, safety and sanctuary of the general public, and I'm far from condoning any illegal acts or bad behaviour or violence against them; but then, I wasn't there to know the reasoning or justification behind the robbery either. Many villains I know don’t have a ‘welfare state' of mind or an option of looking to live off of government benefits. For them it’s a matter of their integrity - they'd rather go hungry or commit armed robbery to get ahead, than ask for a hand out from the …show more content…
Politicians, I won't tarnish all with the same brush, as I'll only put a stain on my own overalls. I was asked why I relate to villains more than a politician? It’s simple! Why should a person have to stand on a podium and shout to be heard? If a person has anything to say that is of value, then it should be spoken not screamed or repeated. I could pick up a phone and have a conversation with anyone of the people mentioned in here, but it would be a conversation that would give credit to their intelligence. Some of those put in public office you will notice during their public address and speeches will bang their fists, so as to give a deliverance with volume of speech and not content and if it's the icing on the cake you're looking for, they'll repeat themselves, as liars do, so as to convince themselves what they're saying is of value. When I'm told something that is of benefit I only have to be told it once. Business is war by another name, and villains are the government’s biggest competitor. That’s why I've always voted for the