ipl-logo

The Pros Of Constructivism And The Catalonians

2323 Words10 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Key ideas of constructivism in international relations

In November of 2014 the Catalonians; an ethnic people located in the very north-eastern corner of Spain, voted for independence from Spain. The voter turnout was compared to other succession votes, such as the Scottish Independence vote in the same year. The Catalonians voted overwhelmingly to break off from Spain with 81% voting for succession. The vote was a symbolic move as it is nonbinding and holds no power of law. Sofia Perez; a political scientist at Boston University, states that this is being used more as a bargaining chip during negotiations. (NPR) These negotiations could see Catalonia maintaining more of its tax revenue for its region, rather than sending it to Madrid. (NPR) There was also a potential scare as the Spanish officials …show more content…

Constructivism is the theory of international relations that states that cultural identity is the main determinant in predicting or examining how a state of nation-state will act. Cultural identity is extended through the types of norms people hold. Norms being the collective agreement among a group of people of what is socially acceptable. Constructives argue that all norms are socially constructed, making them subjective. The theory applied to the Basques and the Catalonians would be demonstrated something like this. The Basque cultural identity is reflected in their sense of self-determination and independence. It is also indicated in their use of violence to protect these ideals. The Catalonians on the other hand have a cultural identity that is strongly linked to the democratic process, therefore they would use the democratic process in the hopes of achieving reform. This makes for sound logic, but it does not mesh with one particular but important fact. The Basque people have enjoyed an extensive history of democracy. (Aguirre 492) Why would they not want to use the democratic process instead of violence if they value democracy so much? These questions do not adequately paint an answer with constructivism. I believe a liberal view of the question would more accurately assess why these ethnic groups choose either …show more content…

Liberalism in international politics is the theory that suggests that domestic politics is the main factor in determining how a state or how nations act in the international system. Dawn Brancati's article, Decentralization: Fueling the Fire or Dampening the Flames of Ethnic Conflict and Secessionism, makes an inherent liberal argument on how ethnic groups react to the stimuli they face. The premise of the work suggests that while decentralization within the state government may reduce ethnic government because they governments leave more power with the ethnic groups. This is stated that the government then works together with the local ethnic group and allows for more opportunities for representation. (Brancati 651) Brancati states that if an ethnic group is allowed to vote and pass legislation protecting things that they hold close to their hearts, then there would be no reason to seek violence or seek secession. (Brancati 656) However, in the same vein Brancati states that this also has an indirect effect of allowing secessionist sentiments to foster in the local population. (Brancati 651) The logic is that if you allow more representation and political opportunities for an ethnic group, that this reinforces their ethnic identity and strengthens their resolve to secede within the state. It would also allow the ethnic group to produce

Show More
Related
954 Words | 4 Pages

The central government has enough power to help some of the country’s major needs and the state government has enough power to help the state’s needs because the state’s needs may be more specific. From this, you may conclude that dividing powers between the central and state governments prevents

Read More
336 Words | 2 Pages

This is superior to having a strong central government like the union because the needs of individual states are more easily managed. For example; all states have different ideals, populations

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

In the Era of Good Feelings, sectionalism was a very important thing; it improved the feeling of nationalism, helped the economy, and strengthened relationships between the states. But good things always have a consequence, and the result of sectionalism forced the people to rely on each other for their

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

If popular government is going to survive, it must be organized to protect minorities from majorities who are going to pursue their own self-interests, ” (p.70). They believed that the central government must be stronger than local governments to prevent individuals or groups from attaining too much

Read More
1689 Words | 7 Pages

Because some powers overlap, there is often conflict between state and national government (Morone, 110). Although most people trust their own state governments more than the national one, there is still a strong sense of nationalism (Morone,

Read More
592 Words | 3 Pages

10, advises that perhaps one of the foremost arguments that promotes the Constitution as the premier form of government, in countering the Anti-Federalist ideas, is the argument that a national, federal system is the best way to fight the factional elements found within. The representative government outlined in the Constitution, such that the citizens elect representatives who then vote and create law with the citizens’ best interest at the fore, is a much better alternative to the states current situation, that of broken unification and growing dissent. As opposed to direct democracy, where every citizen is involved directly in the law making process, is already at the outset not set up for success, because the aforementioned factions will form majorities and vote on law as best suited for themselves, and the minorities end up with no say or voice in the law-making process. Though factions are almost a given in any democracy, a strong, federal government that backs up the states will have much more power to quell any factional attempt to form majorities that until now the disenfranchised states had no power to

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

Running head: STATEHOOD OR INDEPENDENCE 1 Session 4: Academic Paper Virgilio Estrada Colorado Christian University ENG-102A-DT25-FA15: English Composition- Block 2 Professor Elena Bogdan STATEHOOD OR INDEPENDENCE 2 Introduction: Why does this particular topic matter? Everything is fine in Puerto Rico rightful the way things are? The reality is that things are not fine the way they are. Puerto Ricans want a new change. They're just not sure what form it should take.

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

They believed that the organization of a new government would reduce the effects of political factions. They also pointed out that the great advantage of a federal system was to create a “happy combination” of a national government that is too large for any single faction to control. Also, it would create several state government that would be smaller and be responsive to local matters. They also stated that the proposed federal government separation of powers will stop any branch from violating the citizen’s right or taking over the national

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

Madison, in federalist paper no. 10, said that “The latent causes of faction are thus sown in the nature of man,” and concluded that the best way to live with this fact is by restraining these factions. One of the best ways that this is accomplished is through the number of different groups themselves. In a small democracy, the whims of the majority could cause radical and harmful government choices. The organization of a large republic makes it difficult for any group to gain significant influence over the government. Not only this, but the checks and balances of the branches of government and the distance of lawmaking from the majority also slow a majority in government from making rash decisions.

Read More
644 Words | 3 Pages

Moreover, the raise o the oil crude tax to a 68% complements the collapse of Puerto Rico’s economy because all the products consumed on the

Read More
958 Words | 4 Pages

So countries need to assess national interests, whether to cooperate or not. Constructivism also emphasizes the influence of culture in international relations. This is because the relationship is true not only taking into account the political and ideological aspects alone, but also the cultural aspects. For example, if there are cultural similarities between actors will be more likely to facilitate collaboration and no conflicts will occur. This can be seen through the relationship between Malaysia and Indonesia that have a similar culture, namely the cultural and religious expression of Islam.

Read More
3052 Words | 13 Pages

FC Barcelona political character before the Francoist Regime: FC Barcelona’s political character did not start during the Francoist Regime; this relationship is attributed several years before the appearance of the regime and it is claimed that it occurred at the start of the 20th century. According to historian Ramon Spaaij FC Barcelona’s origin with separatism date back to 1910 when the club became the largest team in the region and they changed their official language to Catalan. This fact provides a view that the club FC Barcelona has been related to Catalan nationalism almost since its foundation .

Read More
1938 Words | 8 Pages

The current work is meant to explain the differences and similarities between the most dominant theories in international relations, Realism and Liberalism, both theories have some similarities and differences but much more important and interesting is to discuss and explain what differs and makes similar both theories. Conflicts and wars, Similarities and differences between Realism and Liberalism: Both Liberalism and Realism believes that there is no world government that can prevent countries to go to war on one another. For both theories military power is important and both Realism and Liberalism can understand that countries can use military power to get what they need or want. Also, both theories are conscious that without military

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

Consequently, ethnic conflict arises among rational agents over scarce resources driven by the aims of political leaders for political or economic gains or a deliberate manipulation based on a rational decision to incite or encourage ethnic violence. Ethnic conflict is therefore the result of actor’s rational activity of widespread interest such as prosperity, power and security.5 c. Constructivism (If plagiarism matters, change the content as required) The constructivist theory perceives ethnic identity as a socially constructed and fluid entity that can be formed through various means including conquest, colonization or immigration. Ethnic groups are recognized to be social constructions with ‘identifiable origins and histories of expansion and contraction, amalgamation and division’.

Read More
1266 Words | 6 Pages

Constructivists reject such a one-sided material focus. They argue that the most important aspect of international relations is social, not material. Constructivists have demonstrated that ‘ideas matter’ in international relations. They have shown that culture and identity help define the interests and constitute the actors in IR. All students of IR should be familiar with the important debates raised by constructivists, about basic social theory and about the different ways in which ideas can matter in international relations.

Read More

More about The Pros Of Constructivism And The Catalonians

Related Topics

Open Document