ipl-logo

The Right Side Of The Sixties Analysis

689 Words3 Pages

The Right Side of the Sixties: Reexamining Conservatism’s Decade of Transformation. Edited by Laura Jane Gifford and Daniel K. Williams. (New York: Palgrave MacMillan. 2013. vi. 277 pp.) Laura Jane Gifford and Daniel K. Williams provide twelve essays that expand the scope beyond reactions against liberalism or the leading politicians within the conservative Right. Conservatives returned to their grassroots, redefined what they believed, and direct changes within which produced a new type of Conservative, one proclaiming itself as colorblind, anti-secular, and worldly (4). With their new voice Conservatives gained control of the Republican Party covering issues such as race, economics, religion, and foreign policy …show more content…

Working from the shadows during the sixties, conservatives created a strong base that emerged to be the majority within the United States government at the dismay of the liberals. The first three essays discuss the politics of race in regards to the conservative movement. At the beginning of the sixties, conservatives were on opposite sides of the issue of race, while Southern segregationists continued to promote the racist ideology which slowed the civil rights movement outside of the Southern region. With racial violence in the sixties, grassroots groups such as the Citizen’s Council of Mississippi, a white segregationist group aided the move from the regional segregation to the “color-blind” ideology of conservatism (21-82). The next two essays discuss the shaping of conservative ideology. It was evident that conservatives lacked any credible message or the forums necessary to publicize their ideas. Throughout the essays within the book, grassroots agencies appear which aid in bringing the transformed ideology of the conservatives as an attractive option to large numbers of Americans. One way that Conservatives achieved this was with the banishment of extremist groups such as the John Birch Society from the movement …show more content…

The conservative movement of the 1960s was created within the context of global events from the Cold War, Vietnam War, and Civil Rights. Conservatives learned from the nation’s failures making innovative efforts to change with major policy changes. In many cases conservatives played a dominant role in creating informed and proactive responses to the changing world (161-242). The final essay in the book looks at the political career of Vice President Spiro T. Agnew who has been overshadowed in the history of the conservative movement by Goldwater, Nixon, Reagan and others. Within the essay concerns about race, crime, and social order caused many moderate liberal and conservative Republicans to move to the right side of the spectrum. The next generation of Conservatives established new innovations in economics, activism, and political dynamics (243-260). Gifford and Williams book, The Right Side of the Sixties, takes a unique look at conservatism within the 1960s and demonstrates how it remained on the fringes until liberals buckled under the strain of domestic and international affairs. The benefits of the book is enormous by addressing the conservative viewpoint that is overlooked during the 1960s. Since then conservatives have either dominated politics or blocked liberal

Show More
Related
606 Words | 3 Pages

Schweikart has written over twenty books in his career including popular titles such as, “A Patriot’s History of the United States” and “48 Liberal Lies About American History.” This book analyzes seeming insignificant events and looks at the short and long-term effects on the United States of America. In this book, seven events are looked through in detail and their effects on American Government are explained.

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

A Fierce Discontent McGerr, Michael E. A Fierce Discontent: The Rise and Fall of the Progressive Movement in America, 1870­1920. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005. Print. In “A fierce Discontent”, the main thesis of the book is to give insight to the progressive movement during the 19th century.

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

There were many changes that occurred in the 1960’s in specifically in the goals, strategies, and support of the movement for African American civil rights. While the movement started as peaceful, as the years went along,

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

Jackson’s Democratic-Republicans were renamed simply “Democrats”. On the other side were the Whigs who despised Jackson. They came to prominence through a coalescence of Jackson’s enemies: American System supporters, northern industrialists, and the Anti-Masonic, an Anti-Jackson Party. Sectional tensions have, for better or for worse, dramatically shaped the development of political parties in the United States. As a testament to the soundness of these parties, they are still active today in the forms of Democrats and Republicans, very much true in practice to what they were founded for.

Read More
381 Words | 2 Pages

Party strength is a measure of the ability of a party to get people to vote for its candidates. The post-World War II shift in party strength was part of a massive shift in policy over time. Scholars saw Republican politicians increasingly excel at getting elected at the local level (Lublin 2006), to offices in the state (Hayes and McKee 2007), and federal governments (Black and Black 2002, 1992; Shafer and Johnston 2006). It is difficult to see how the Republican Party would have become the majority in Congress in 1994 without the increased voting strength in the South. This marked a dramatic shift in national policy.

Read More
99 Words | 1 Pages

Citizens of today’s society are convinced that they are divided tremendously. That the Republicans are so far right on the spectrum and that the Democrats are so far left on the spectrum that it is impossible for both parties to come to an agreement on any type of issue. If citizens dig deeper into the political world, they will find that there is not much of a difference between the two parties as they think. My job is to uncover what you may not know about politics, and have you see the opposing party 's view on the issues

Read More
694 Words | 3 Pages

Michael Oakeshott and Edmund Burke have very similar views on Conservatism, yet they both use different styles of writing and fundamental reasoning to justify their views. Though Burke expressed his views on Conservatism in 1790 and Oakeshott wrote in 1962, 172 years later, the two men have astonishingly similar explanations of Conservatism. They share similar thoughts on conservative themes such as gradual change, the embrace of familiarity, and agree upon their distaste for rationalism. Though the two authors have slightly contrasting reasons for their beliefs and ways of writing about them, the assumptions they make regarding conservatism are notably alike despite the substantial time gap between them.

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

The Rise of Ronald Reagan and Republican Conservatism Conservatism and liberalism are two of the most dominant political philosophies and ideologies during the post-Enlightenment era (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). As an ideology, conservatism served as a blueprint in the society which promoted the idea of retaining traditional social institutions, beliefs, cultures and discourage social changes. Although the United States of America during the present day promotes liberalism, there was one portion of the country’s history that conservatism was promoted due to several factors. This paper examines the very factors which gave rise to conservatism embodied in the candidacy of Ronald Reagan.

Read More
401 Words | 2 Pages

Michael McGerr focuses on a variety of topics, including the middle-class during this time and he coverers a wide variety of themes, including the importance of individualism. Michael McGerr states, “The enter of this book looks at four quintessential progressive battles: to change other people; to end class conflict; to control big business, and to segregate society.” (McGerr, xv) A Fierce Discontent is a history book in its own and Michael McGerr does an excellent job of incorporating detailed account of Americans during this era of social and political unrest. While we might “live in a politically disappointing time” (McGerr, xiii), Michael McGerr makes what might be a little boring better by offering compelling evidence of the Progressive

Read More
279 Words | 2 Pages

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a large portion of Americans were restricted from civil and political rights. In American government in Black and White (Second ed.), Paula D. McClain and Steven C. Tauber and Vanna Gonzales’s power point slides, the politics of race and ethnicity is described by explaining the history of discrimination and civil rights progress for selective groups. Civil rights were retracted from African Americans and Asian Americans due to group designation, forms of inequality, and segregation. These restrictions were combatted by reforms such as the Thirteenth Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment, the Fifteenth amendment, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, etc. Although civil and political

Read More
1749 Words | 7 Pages

There are two objectives of this essay; first is to prove that conservatism in Michael Oakeshott’s ‘On Being Conservative’ piece is logical and valid on two premises: a) the maintenance of order to promote stability in practicing conservatism in government despite adopting radical approach in its other activity, and b) its cautiousness that makes it relevant to practice. Secondly, to argue that Oakeshott’s conservatism, is however incomplete and flawed as it does not provide the alternative of progressing, plus not considering the variations of individuals in the society. In order to critically analyse this essay, we need to understand what influenced him, hence his political theory. Oakeshott is considered as a skeptical philosopher and is

Read More
444 Words | 2 Pages

The Pitfalls of Liberalism was a document by Stokely Carmichael who is known as one of the most recognized exponents of the “Black Power.” Movement. Stokely Carmichaels main argument in this document is that the efforts of Dr. Martin Luther King along with other civil rights activists had reached an endpoint since the use of “Widespread resistance within America” (238) was in effect. Throughout the semester, we have never seen a document where a leaders only solution to advance is by “calling for the mobilization of organized violence by African-Americans in order to seize political power” (238). The concept of calling upon one single race to take action is new.

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

The American present witnesses the steady aggrandizement of” powers, while “the story of the American past, on the other hand, continues to be told in narratives that…highlight[s] a story of relative powerlessness.” This conflicting representation of American past versus present supports Novak’s claim that one cannot associate what began as a weak state to how it is formed today, indicating a falsehood to Tea Party members

Read More
2506 Words | 11 Pages

Finally, it will be argued that the modern political party system in the United States is a two-party system dominated by the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. These two parties have won every United States presidential election since 1852 and have controlled the United States Congress since 1856. The Democratic Party generally positions itself as centre-left in American politics and supports a modern American liberal platform, while the Republican Party generally positions itself as centre-right and supports a modern American conservative platform. (Nichols, 1967)

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

The Kennedy-Johnson years (1961-1969) provided the stimulant for social and economic re-form, but most of their policy initiatives were confounded by domestic strife and foreign policy failure. Discuss. The 1960s heralded a period of both social and economic change as both John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson attempted to continue the legacy of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s ‘New Deal’. However, “competing domestic and foreign policy constituencies” stymied some of their efforts at reform therefore whilst in many cases their policies stimulated reform in later decades much of their energies in the 1960s were focused overseas.

Read More

More about The Right Side Of The Sixties Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document