The Role Of Democracy In Roman Republic

632 Words3 Pages

Considered one of the greatest Empires to rule Europe, the Roman Republic dwelled of a extensively civilized society and government. Leaving historians continually pondering how the Roman Republic stayed civilized for the large amount of time the Republic ruled. Nevertheless, democracy was vital to the success of the Roman Republic, society depended on it. Yet, was the Roman’s definition of truly being democratic, different from the current society's state of democracy? The Roman Republic was significant for the time of government, considering the past governmental care of the Republic. Nevertheless, the Roman Republic was truly democratic, as it was consisted of an Assembly that passed laws as voted by society, a civilization where every male citizen and free slave could vote, and an Empire where you could legislate.

To have a society be democratic, laws must be set in stone as a guideline for the civilization to follow. To help encourage this interest, the Romans would grant people the ability to pass laws through elections. The Assemblies then had the final vote in passing or repealing laws, along with keeping peace or starting wars. The Romans had wasted no time in creating a civilized government. Lucidly, Rome had not one governmental law …show more content…

Allowing the people to have a say in what happens throughout the country, is a specific example the Roman Republic introduced. This had illustrated the thought of democracy, which describes the civilization’s government. The Roman Republic was truly democratic, as it was consisted of an Assembly that passed laws as voted by society, a civilization where every male citizen and free slave could vote, and an Empire where you could legislate. Therefore, having the exclusive ability to assembly and pass legislations is by far the strongest reason why, in pure and truthful terms, the Roman Republic was truly characterized as a