ipl-logo

The Role Of Justice In Tragic Orestes

978 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Why did king oedipus deserve his punishment

Greek literature has forced a theme of tyrannical nemesis upon its contents. It is shown that fate and its agents have controlled the Greek sense of justice in a strictly one-sided method. This “dictatorship” of punishment has lead to countless deaths of innocent, and the release of guilty based on the decree of an individual. Sophocles introduces an opposition to the former ideal by presenting a seemingly unresolvable scenario. Neither the revenge of the Furies nor the compassion of Apollo can grant justice single-handedly upon the crimes of tragic Orestes. Therefore, from the opposing concepts of justice, as presented by Apollo and the Furies, it is shown that the mean of the two is the ultimate ideal of justice. In order to understand …show more content…

He uses concepts of mercy and leniency in a way opposing that of the Furies. He not only believes Orestes is innocent but also restates his disdain at the methods of the Furies multiple times, saying, “They disgust me. These grey, ancient children never touched by god, man or beast - the eternal virgins. Born for destruction only, the dark pit, they range the bowels of Earth, the world of death, loathed by men and the gods who hold Olympus (BLANK)”. He supposedly has extensive insight on, “The rules of justice (BLANK).” With that in mind, he seems to lean further away from justice into anarchy. Apollo is dismissing the methods of the Furies completely and establishes personal motives to save Orestes. So despite his knowledge, he ignores the concepts of justice, and its appointed executers, and creates an anarchy where the lack opposition makes him a slave to himself. So in attempting to preserve justice, he created a verdict that, although it was indirectly justifiable, failed to create a verdict for Orestes that was justly …show more content…

Neither the tyrannical punishment or anarchist leniency can solve this dilemma. However, Athena, the goddess of wisdom, reveals the answer. She says, in a remarkable conclusion to the issue, “Neither anarchy nor tyranny, my people. Worship the Mean, I urge you, shore it up with reverence and never banish terror from the gates, not outright (BLANK).” This quote explains that on their own, neither side is a viable solution, but that the mean of the two is the answer. The mean is a rare thing, and it must be valued. Sophocles identifies this concept as the court. Athens is given the privilege of judging between the two sides. Those who vote do not have an iron rule individually, nor a selfish chaos, but instead a self-checking balance with power over the gods and furies. The sacred court, must not be overthrown, innovated, or changed. From this all, it is shown that the mean is the ultimate ideal of

Show More
Related
436 Words | 2 Pages

In Plato’s Republic, Thrasymachus presented several arguments in favor of the position that “Might makes right.” Presenting his first argument, he stated “Listen, then. I say justice is nothing other than what is advantageous for the stronger.” By the stronger, he meant the people who establish the rules in the country. Thrasymachus explained that any type of government, as it could be democracy or tyranny, has its own rules and the person who doesn’t obey to those rules will be considered unjust and therefore punished.

Read More
1399 Words | 6 Pages

While Odysseus’ actions taken to punish the suitors may appear immoral in modern society, by considering the ways in which modern society differs from Homeric society, Odysseus’ actions are just in the context of the poem. As violence has an extremely negative connotation in modern society, the use of the death penalty is morally ambiguous, and is a highly debated topic; however, violence is far more legitimized in the society of the Odyssey, and therefore, death is a far more acceptable form of punishment. This idea is exemplified by the way in which violence is discussed between characters within the Odyssey. In particular, this general acceptance of violence is demonstrated through the fact that many of the characters within the Odyssey share an almost unanimous belief that the suitors should be put to death to pay for their crimes.

Read More
396 Words | 2 Pages

It is interesting to point out that the Athenians start out by leaving justice out of the argument because they say they are not equal because they are much more powerful than the Melians and that justice is only power between equals (1). They leave justice out because they know they would lose the argument of justice against the Melians. They selfishly state that it is only good for themselves that they conquer the city but keep it intact (2). Furthermore, they say it is to their benefit if they give in even though the Athenians would benefit from it the most (2). However, they explicitly demonstrate the Machiavellian principle by appearing to benefit the Melians but not wanting to be friends because they seek it necessary to hate Melos to

Read More
732 Words | 3 Pages

Bothered by Socrates’ logic, Thrasymachus presents a revised version of his previous argument. Thrasymachus says that injustice is stronger than justice and that it most definitely results in a happier life. The example he uses (of a powerful dictator who is made happy through injustice is a reference to his earlier example that justice is used to the advantage of the stronger). Thrasymachus has not greatly changed the principle of his argument, just using alternate examples.

Read More
1388 Words | 6 Pages

Some might object that because Athens is ruled by a majority, it would be illogical to follow their laws. Perhaps because the majority are seldom the experts and, as Socrates indicates,it is far more logical to listen to the experts. In this situation, however the majority are the experts. They are the citizens of Athens, the people who chose the manner of government, and to be governed by it. The citizens rule themselves and are the creators, enforcers, and interpreters of

Read More
1382 Words | 6 Pages

Socrates bases this view of justice on the worth of living a good life. “And is life worth living for us with that part of us corrupted by unjust actions” (47e) If we corrupt our soul with injustice, our life would not be worth living, therefore one must never commit an injustice. “When one has come to an agreement that is just with someone, one should fulfill it.”(49e) It is this agreement with the Laws that Socrates would be violating, if he were to

Read More
1285 Words | 6 Pages

Socrates had the concept of justice, but possibly no one can obtain such

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

Indeed, too often they only create more grandiose problems in the long-term. Throughout classical literature acts of senseless violence have been a common thread. In Homer’s The Iliad several instances of such violence are revealed. As Trojans and Achaeans engage in a brutal battle, neither mortal nor immortal is safe from the conflict.

Read More
777 Words | 4 Pages

Though most people would like to think that they can control their destiny, one’s fate is something that cannot be altered. No amount of anything can factor into contributing to one’s providence. Fate is something that is inevitably predetermined and should be accepted by everyone as it is out of their hands. Though it is not as meaningful in today’s world, the idea of fate was immensely important to the ancient culture of Greece. In the Iliad, fate plays an extensive role in the plot of the story as it is conspicuous in the actions of Hektor and Achilles.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

It can be seen as a trend throughout history that stories reflect a society’s culture and values. One of the most memorable and inspirational civilization that made a substantial contribution to literature was Greece. Sophocles, a renowned Greek playwright, is beloved for his dramatic and action-filled plays that effectively satisfied the ancient audience. In Sophocles’ tragic play, Oedipus the King, the main character, Oedipus finds difficulty proclaiming his purpose against the fate bestowed upon him by the gods. Alongside his struggling, the values and cultural aspects of the Greeks emerge, reflecting their views on society during that time period at which the play was produced.

Read More
1001 Words | 5 Pages

They think tradition produces such an approach to the justice. Furies believe justice fails when Athena decides there will be a trial with Athenians being the judges . Mortals participating as decision makers while the divine justice being ignored causes Furies to think themselves as insignificant and they start showing humanely emotions such as rage . This shows even the powerful old gods demonstrate weak mortal behaviours which indicates their judgement could not be taken as absolute due to such weakness. The nature of justice and whether mortals should participate in it is one of the sharp differences in the opinion of the old gods and the

Read More
936 Words | 4 Pages

In Sophocles’ Antigone, Kreon and Antigone battle with their conflicting opinions of justice. In Aristophanes’ Frogs, the wise poets argue who is fit to rescue Athens, and in the Homer’s

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

“Melians (90): It is useful at any rate the way we see it, not to destroy a principle that works for the common good; that one falling in danger should be treated with fairness and justice, and thus benefit from this, if he can persuade his judges, even short of the exact limits.” At this point the Athenians were quite confident in their power, and didn’t need power. Since they were stronger than the Melians, it means that it was better for the Melians to think of their survival and not justice at that point. According to the Athenians, justice would only be considered when both sides are neutral. However, the Melians were not ready to give up on justice as they believed that it was a principle that works for the common

Read More
958 Words | 4 Pages

In ancient Greece, a common saying that all citizens had in their very core, a traditional Greek principle, was this: love your friends, and hate your enemies. This rule seems pretty straightforward and would appear easy to apply in real life. However, in the timeless play Antigone, Sophocles shows his audience a situation where this maxim does not apply. Sophocles concentrates on a complex story where the values and principles of the ancient Greek culture come into conflict. Religious or moral versus secular, family versus community, and living versus dead: all of these conflicting aspects are explored in Antigone.

Read More
1151 Words | 5 Pages

In “Plato’s Gorgias” Socrates debates with fellow philosophers, Polus, Callicles, Chaerephon and Gorgias, of ancient Greece over rhetoric, justice, and power. During these debates, Socrates makes a claim to Polus that it is better to suffer injustices rather than to commit injustice because the positive and negative consequences that come along with committing and suffering injustices. This claim by Socrates that it is better to suffer injustice than to commit injustice is pretty easy to comprehend once all the parts are analyzed. At first, this idea seems crazy that it is actually beneficial to suffer injustice and wrong-doing.

Read More

More about The Role Of Justice In Tragic Orestes

Related Topics

Open Document