ipl-logo

The Role Of The Executive In Federalist Paper 68

884 Words4 Pages

The executive branch is necessary to keep the United States government dependable and stable. Although there is a fear that the United States will revert to the tyrannical state it was previously in, having one executive is the only way for our new nation to succeed. Thomas Hobbes explains the reasoning for this best: human nature leads to war unless there is a commonwealth . For this commonwealth to flourish, it must have an executive power at its center to ensure America’s prosperity. Further, as explained in Federalist 68, the executive gains power through the people, it is in not inherited. Therefore, the executive will be someone who meritoriously earns the trust of the American people. The presence of an executive within the United States …show more content…

In Federalist Paper 68, Hamilton discusses the process of choosing this executive. When Hamilton speaks about the president, he states, “this end will be answered by committing the right of making it, not to any preestablished body, but to men chosen by the people for the special purpose, and at the particular conjuncture.” Unlike Great Britain where rulers inherit powers through families, the executive power in the United States will be elected through each state. Therefore, this executive will be a representation of what the majority of the country wants and must prove themselves to the American citizens. The person who assumes the presidency will be fit for the title, a person who will protect the nation and its peoples’ rights at all costs. Federalist Paper 70 discusses the importance of a high energy, single executive. Hamilton argues that when there is more than one person in charge, differences in opinions are inevitable. There must be a single executive, however, it should be up to the legislature to make large decisions, “though [the differences of opinions] may sometimes obstruct salutary plans, yet often promote deliberation and circumspection, and serve to check excesses in the majority.” Through this, most decisions will be made by winning the majority of the legislature, who represent the American citizens better as a whole. These branches will ensure that there is no abuse of power at any level of the

Show More
Related

Federalist No. 78 Summary

63 Words | 1 Pages

There was discussion of judicial review in Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton, which explained that the federal courts would have the power of judicial review. Hamilton stated that under the Constitution, the federal judiciary would have the power to declare laws unconstitutional. He also stated that this was appropriate because it would protect the people against abuse of power by Congress.

Read More

Articles Of Confederation Executive Branch Analysis

213 Words | 1 Pages

As our nation first formed, there was much concern about the role of our nation’s leader and how powerful they should be. When the Articles of Confederation were written in 1781, it did not provide for an executive branch. In 1787, at the first Constitutional convention, the delegates agreed that there had to be an executive branch which would be separate from the legislative branch. They felt this would avoid any corruption and would provide for checks and balances to prevent dictatorial rule by this branch of government. Though small, the executive branch plays a crucial role in running the United States.

Read More

Analysis Of Federalist Paper Number 70 By Alexander Hamilton

1552 Words | 7 Pages

In Federalist Paper Number 70, Alexander Hamilton wrote an article titled The Executive Department Further Considered. In this paper Hamilton using the pseudonym Publius, makes the case for a single-person executive chief for the future federal government. Hamilton writes that the President must have qualities as an “Executive which are the most necessary ingredients…vigor and expedition. ”

Read More

The Role Of Checks And Balances In The Federalist Papers 10 And 51

354 Words | 2 Pages

The kind of constitutional republic James Madison (Madison) is arguing for in the Federalist papers is fulfilled in today’s modern administrative bureaucracy. Factions and separation of powers are the main points referred to in the Federalist Papers 10 and 51. The Federalist Nos. 10, 51 (James Madison). Administrative agencies are not the factions that Madison fears in the Federalist Paper No.10

Read More

Discussion Of The Presidency In Federalist Paper 69 By Alexander Hamilton

151 Words | 1 Pages

Federalist Paper 69, written by Alexander Hamilton in 1788, addresses the topic of the presidency. Its purpose was to illustrate to the people of New York what the real character of the executive would be. The subject matter and time period of this essay allow for speculation that the people of that time were concerned that ratifying a constitution with a president at the head of government would have been willingly putting themselves beneath a tyrannical ruler, after having recently gained independence from tyrannical King George III. Throughout this essay, Hamilton adamantly stressed the fact that the president would not be likened unto the king of Great Britain, but rather unto the governor of New York. The president would be an elected

Read More

The Anti-Federalist No. 84

392 Words | 2 Pages

I Agree… “The Federalist No. 84” and “The Anti-Federalist No.84”, both have their views on what should happen to our government. Whether it is to add a bill of rights or not, but I agree with the writer of “The Federalist No.84” because if the Constitution is adopted, then it will be our Bill of Rights, also based on other countries’ bill of rights then it may argue with a semblance of reason. Because I have read both sides of the discussion, I can see who is wrong and why.

Read More

Tyranny Dbq

463 Words | 2 Pages

“The accumulation of all powers..in the same hands, whether of one or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, 1788) ( Background Essay) This quote explains the reasoning for one of the framers, (B) Separation of Powers. The framers of the constitution were created to prevent tyranny and create a stronger government that would hold the nation together. Tyranny ultimately means harsh, absolute power in the hands of one individual-- like a king or dictator. The constitution guarded against tyranny in 4 ways: (A)Federalism, (B)Separation of Powers, (C)Checks & Balances, and (D)Small State-Large State.

Read More

Slavery In Joseph J. Ellis's Founding Brothers

946 Words | 4 Pages

After a fiercely fought revolution, the newly independent American nation struggled to establish a concrete government amidst an influx of opposing ideologies. Loosely tied together by the Articles of Confederation, the thirteen sovereign states were far from united. As growing schisms in American society became apparent, an array of esteemed, prominent American men united in 1787 to form the basis of the United States government: the Constitution. Among the most eminent members of this convention were Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr, James Madison, and Thomas Jefferson. These men, held to an almost godly stature, defined the future of the nation; but were their intentions as honest as they seemed?

Read More

Why Did The Articles Of Confederation Only Last 10 Years

781 Words | 4 Pages

Regulating the branches of government is crucial to the success of our country, so the constitution laid out the concept of “checks and balances”. For example, the president can veto any bill passed by legislature. In this case, the executive branch checks the legislative branch of government. If this wasn’t possible, congress could pass any bill they want, and ultimately become a powerhouse. These guidelines help keep the government intact, and in turn keep the constitution intact.

Read More

Three Parts Of The US Constitution: The Preamble, And The Amendments

1522 Words | 7 Pages

The Vice President is also part of the Executive Branch, ready to assume the Presidency should the need

Read More

Comparison Of Thomas Jefferson And Alexander Hamilton

530 Words | 3 Pages

After securing its independence from Britain, America was immediately faced with a crisis of how the budding country should be governed. The Articles of Confederation was the first effort to establish a democratic government in the US; however, this feeble attempt at a creating a stable government failed due to a lack of control over the states. Rather than a functioning authority in the nation, the Articles created a “firm league of friendship” between the states. To remedy this pathetic excuse for a ruling body, a Constitution was drafted, and rival sides emerged quickly on the main issues the new document was supposed to address. Two men that embodied this conflict were Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, both passionate patriots who strongly believed that their proposed forms of government were in the best interests of the country, but they disagreed fundamentally on what that form of government should be.

Read More

Examples Of Improving The Articles Of Confederation

1576 Words | 7 Pages

This sets the stage for the checks and balances from the judicial and legislative branches of government that must be, and have been, done at times in order to reign in the power of the presidency. The successes, not only in the subsequent leadership, growth, and ability of the executive office, but the successful checks and balances in the 20th century, such as Watergate, U.S. v Nixon, and others, are thanks to the founder’s framing of the way our government operates. Strong leadership, while having a guaranteed opportunity to change a government that may have become too powerful, is an inherently American ideal, and is what the founders intended for the future of our

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Federalists

1203 Words | 5 Pages

“The Federalist,” written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison under the surname ‘Publius,’ attempts to convince the American people that a republican government would be beneficial to both the people and the United States as a whole. Since ‘Publius’ is, in actuality, three different people, one would expect to find some discrepancies between authors. However, in analyzing “The Federalist,” Madison and Hamilton present a unified front – in order to control the effects of factions, they agree that a government should be able to protect its constituents from their misguided passions, that virtual representation is necessary, and that checks and balances among the divided powers of the government are vital. Factions are a source

Read More

How Did Sherlock Holmes Continue To Solve My Mystery

83 Words | 1 Pages

Although my mystery was not solved, Sherlock Holmes is still continuing to work on solving it with the help of Watson. He is going to solve my mystery using his clever mind, and reasoning skills to think of any details, big or small to give him clues about who the murderer is. This will eventually lead him to the murderer. He will use this same technique just as when he solved the case of the Red-Headed League in both the movie and book.

Read More

Realism Theories In International Relations

1310 Words | 6 Pages

Introduction Throughout time the study of war has always been a focal point in the study of international relations. Over time, there have been many theories proposed to help us understand what actually causes wars. Some theories depend on social and mental nature of man or separate learners in general. Other theories focus on the decision making process of the regime or domestic politics to describe the theories of war (Reiter 2003). Nevertheless, the most dominant theories or perceptions of what causes wars are Realism and Liberalism.

Read More

More about The Role Of The Executive In Federalist Paper 68

Related Topics

Open Document