The Second Gilded Age

In during the age of the Second Industrial Revolution, the nation perceived in instances of disparity, progression, and revolutionary stanzas. However, this thesis still continues in present history. Known as the “Second Gilded Age,” the nation still permits a crisis of disunity among its individuals. The economic system closely associates in its impact on the federal government, much in similarity to the monopolies and the political representatives’ endorsement to the laissez faire ordeal. Seemingly, technological advances advocated the creation of institutions for the protection of the masses, even in sense that the disparity between the common individual and its wealthy elite are in disproportion defined under the manipulations of the political-social

With similar detail, the Second Industrial Revolution impacted on the overall growth of the nation’s economy. In present-day, these remnants of this previous economic growth continues to dominate this current nation’s representation. In a way, the wealthy individuals contain major impact on the conclusions of federal policies and candidate elections. Even then, the idea of laissez faire, or the non-intervention of the government in corporal affairs, are still in place and in favor for both the corporate and federal individuals, much like the initial rise of the First Gilded Age. In present-day, the wealthy elite still continues to dominate much of the economic-political aspects of this nation, whether in instances of hiring lobbyists for political campaigns or the heavy dependence in industrial

The resistance to raising the minimum wage for all workers are contained in the mindset the wealthy elites. The protection of the laissez faire ordeals halts the expansion of economic equality. This disparity in the distribution of wealth will continue to be enforced under a legislation heavily dominated by industrial reasonings. In addition, socially, a population of a specified group continues to lack the same equality to those of the different individuals. This results in the rise of a corrupt system on a national level under the desire for more wealth of those certain individuals. Overall, the “Second Gilded Age” prescribes under an intense illusion of the common wealth, and even then, the nation is dominantly controlled by those of the wealthy.

In concluding statements, the present-day situations can be referred under the nominations of the “Second Gilded Age” in due fact to the underlying disunity of the social, political, and economic spectrums. Large corporations control much of the political statements in terms of favoring business-orientated policies and wealth fluctuations. Even with the improvement of overall way of life such as the creation and protection of the workers’ rights, a dominant thesis still stagnates the progression of all aspects, not just technological