ipl-logo

The Stanford Prison Experiment Summary

869 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: What we learned from the stanford prison experiment

Introductory Textbooks know that they don’t need the Stanford Prison Experiment to be awesome since the belief is that they’re already awesome. You and I might not share the same opinions but who knew textbooks could be all that. Which is ironic because The Stanford Prison Experiment is one of the most famous experiments in psychological history. Haslam and Reicher say the SPE website receives 7,000 visitors each day. Richard Griggs asks the question, is with the Stanford Prison having such prestige, why don’t some textbooks include this famous experiment and critiques? I can’t believe that Gray decided to leave out the SPE because he couldn’t agree with the usual interpretation that the situation affects how people behave. He also couldn’t …show more content…

It’s important to note that the researchers of this experiment did not take any leadership roles which is different from the SPE. They concluded that chaos comes from the less powered individuals identifying with more violent regimes and their leaders just like when I was watching the Interview and the North Korean leader was sitting in a tank listening to Katy Perry. The BBC study also failed to show the brutality of the guards like in the SPE so no paper bags for those prisoners. This study is different from older studies including Gray’s study about his decisions in his evaluation because the authors of the introductory textbooks have more information on the SPE than studies from the past. Thank god for the advancement of technology. The purpose of this study is to find what these authors have covered of the SPE in their textbooks. Griggs and Jackson made sure that the books were contemporary by picking the latest copyright dates between 2011 and 2013. So, we can all be pretty sure these books aren’t covered in inches of dust. All the books were checked to make sure they include the full story and the critiques of both the SPE the BBC Prison Study. The present study aims to see how much current books reference the SPE. First, Griggs and Jackson looked at the 13 copies of the books and checked the indexes for Zimbardo or SPE. Also, they went page by page for information not stated in the index which would give anybody a headache. If there was coverage, they wrote down the page numbers and how many paragraphs covered the experiment which I’m sure took forever. They determined the extent of the coverage by subheading the text and determined the completeness by what other related studies were

Show More
Related

The Stanford Prison Experiment Vs A Few Good Men

983 Words | 4 Pages

In society, the people with more power are likely on a higher level than those who have less power. A person who is given orders has the right to decide whether to follow them or not, and this idea is clearly the situation from reading “The Perils of Obedience,” “The Stanford Prison Experiment,” and watching “A Few Good Men.” At the end of the film, why did the two marines not have to go back to jail, but were no longer allowed to be Marines? Why was their case pardoned from prison sentencing?

Read More

Stanford Prison Experiment Ethically Wrong

444 Words | 2 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) had a main goal to find out how much of an influence a specific setting location could have on how individuals behave. The experiment took place in 1971 and many psychologists used as a reference to analyze people’s mind under certain circumstance. Young individuals were given the roles of prisoner and guard in prison-like setting located at the Psychology department Stanford University. I strongly believe that this experiment was ethically wrong and did not surprise me at all, since the participant in the study were not fully aware of how dangerous the experiment could turn. Furthermore, the guards were acting like real inmate’s officers

Read More

Compare And Contrast Stanford Prison Experiment And Philip Zimbardo

751 Words | 4 Pages

In 1971, Philip Zimbardo set out to conduct an experiment to observe behavior as well as obedience. In Philip Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison experiment, many dispute whether it was obedience or merely conforming to their predesigned social roles of guards and prisoners that transpired throughout the experiment. Initially, the experiment was meant to test the roles people play in prison environment; Zimbardo was interested in finding out whether the brutality reported among guards in American prisons was due to the sadistic personalities of the guards, disposition, or had more to do with the prison environment. This phenomenon has been arguably known to possibly influencing the catastrophic similarities which occurred at Abu Ghraib prison in 2003.The

Read More

The Stanford Prison Experiment: A Psychological Study

347 Words | 2 Pages

Second, The Stanford Prison Experiment was a psychological study that was too inhumane to continue because of the behavior of the prison guards when handed with superiority and the mental breakdowns of the prisoners. E: “Now, you 'll all be given sunglasses and uniforms to give the prisoners a sense of a unified, singular authority… And from this point forward you should never refer to this as a study or experiment again,’’ (Dr. Phil Zimbardo).

Read More

Stanford Prison Experiment By Philip Zimbardo

544 Words | 3 Pages

The Stanford prison experiment, was an attempt on investigating the psychological effects of perceived power. Mainly focusing on the struggles between the prisoners and the prison officers. It was conducted in Stanford University from August 14 to 20, 1971, by a research group led by Philip Zimbardo. He was very interested in knowing whether the brutality reported among the guards in most American prisoners was due to the cruelty of the personalities of the guards. As I was reading about the Stanford prison experiment I realized it was a very controversial issue.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Milgram Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment

810 Words | 4 Pages

Since the beginning of the human existence, man has always dominated and ruled over one another be it empires, corporations, or small groups. Authority and obedience has always been a factor of who we are. This natural occurrence can be seen clearly through the psychological experiments known as The Milgram Experiment and the Stanford Prison Experiment. Both of these studies are based on how human beings react to authority figures and what their obedience is when faced with conflict.

Read More

Stanford Prison Experiment By Philip Zimbardo

843 Words | 4 Pages

In 1973, a psychological experiment was orchestrated and performed by the professor of Psychology at Stanford University by the name of Phillip K. Zimbardo. This experiment was deemed unethical on many levels by countless people around the world. It raised questions about the ability of people who were forced to exist in oppressive or obedient roles and was known as The Stanford Prison Experiment. Philip Zimbardo began to research how prisoners and guards assume obedient and authoritative roles. The so called prisoners were acquired through an advertisement placed in a local newspaper.

Read More

The Stanford Prison Experiment: Can Normal People Behaving Evil?

858 Words | 4 Pages

Normal People Behaving Evil The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment to see if normal people would change their behavior in a role-play as a prisoner or a prison guard. The experiment was conducted by Dr.Philip Zimbardo in 1973 at Stanford University that caused numerous amount of trauma to prisoners by prison guards in their role-playing position which forced Dr. Zimbardo to officially terminate the experiment six days after it was introduced. Due to the cruel aggressive behaviors from the guards, the experiment led to a question, "Do "normal" people have the capability of behaving badly?" The answer to that question is that most likely an individual who behave normally will have the capability of expressing evil behavior due to the environment that they are surrounded.

Read More

Why Is The Stanford Prison Experiment Bad

770 Words | 4 Pages

Stanford Prison Argumentative Essay Have you ever felt like you have another side to you that is evil? There was an experiment done by psychologist Philip Zimbardo. The experiment's main goal was to find out if humans are really evil by nature, and the results show that everyone can be evil, but something has to cause a reaction in your brain where you have to use this "hidden evil" to survive. The Stanford prison experiment was a very beneficial and cruel experiment, but it was a necessary one at that; it opened our eyes to human nature and to how we adapt in our environment to survive. This experiment had a crucial influence on many people's beliefs that humans are evil by nature.

Read More

The Zimbardo Prison Experiment

858 Words | 4 Pages

Certain people were prisoners and others were prison guards. During this, the prison guards were allowed to use any form of discipline they wanted. In retaliation, the prisoners lashed out, and it became complete chaos. This experiment test social influence showed us the influence that power can have on people and can alter their behavior. Janis’ notion helps us understand social influence on another level, because as the number of people increase the heavier the influence and peer pressure is.

Read More

Effects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

1368 Words | 6 Pages

The official definition of an experiment is a scientific procedure undertaken to make a discovery, test a hypothesis, or demonstrate a known fact. While the Stanford Prison Experiment was supposed to be a psychological experiment, which took place in a mock prison, however, it fell extremely short of being a tangible scientific experiment. There was no control group, no substantial hypothesis, and fell short of demonstrating any facts; the experiment took place simply because Dr. Zimbardo got an idea based on the Holocaust. Although the Stanford Prison Experiment was intended to be an experiment, it became similar to a simulation due to the experiment's constituents, higher powers pushing constituents to act a certain way, and the head experimenter.

Read More

Textual Evidence

774 Words | 4 Pages

Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; identify false statements and fallacious reasoning. 9. Analyze seminal US documents of historical and literary significance (e.g., Washington’s Farewell Address, the Gettysburg Address, Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms Speech, King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail”), including how they address related themes and concepts. 7. Integrate quantitative or technical analysis (e.g., charts, research data) with qualitative analysis in print or digital text.

Read More

The Stanford Prison Experiment: Unethical Or Not

746 Words | 3 Pages

Stanford Experiment: Unethical or Not Stanford Prison Experiment is a popular experiment among social science researchers. In 1973, a psychologist named Dr. Philip Zimbardo wants to find out what are the factors that cause reported brutalities among guards in American prisons. His aim was to know whether those reported brutalities were because of the personalities of the guards or the prison environment. However, during the experiment, things get muddled unexpectedly. The experiment became controversial since it violates some ethical standards while doing the research.

Read More

Stanford Prison Experiment Case Study

779 Words | 4 Pages

It showed how normal civilians acted when they were given authority over others. Even the most cordial, intelligent people can take on an evil, machiavellianistic nature when introduced to a dominant role in an individualized setting. This experiment taught psychologists so many things about human behavior and the prison system. It is an event that is taught in classrooms all over the world. While some people question the ethics of the experiment, it paved the way for more understanding as well as the reform of psychological practices

Read More

What Is The Cognitive Dissonance Theory Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

1231 Words | 5 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by psychologist Philip Zimbardo in 1971 illustrated the direct relationship between power of situations and circumstances to shape an individual’s behavior. During this study 24 undergraduates were grouped into roles of either a Prisoner or a Guard, the study was located in a mock correctional facility in the basement of Stanford University. Researchers then observed the prisoners and guards using hidden cameras. The study was meant to last two weeks. However, the brutality of the Guards and the suffering of the Prisoners was so intense that it had to be terminated after only six days.

Read More

More about The Stanford Prison Experiment Summary

Open Document