Can one live completely separate from the inner battle of good and evil? Can man live completely virtuous or intensely psychotic devil? We think the answer lies in the tale of Dr. Jekyll and his counterpart, Mr. Hyde. But is it really? Author Robert Stevenson might have been hinting at something more than just what would happen if a respectable human being let out his selfish desires out. No, I think it was an exploration of what life would be like, without control. Yes, humans should be allowed to live free and be who they are, but there is a level of control we learn as infants and children to control our urges. We learn to have a tight rein on our urges for violence, glutton, and sex. It is something we inherit and learn from those around us. But I believe that Mr. Stevenson wanted to explore the idea of a mild-mannered man(Dr. Jekyll, Mr. Utterson), and …show more content…
In Chapter One, when we meet Mr. Hyde, the embodiment of Jekyll’s urges, we see the first urge, “Well, sir, the two ran into one another naturally enough at the corner; and then came the horrible part of the thing; for the man trampled calmly over the child's body and left her screaming on the ground”(1.8) Hyde walks over a child he fell, not quickly as if he wanted to go away, but slow and melodically. He walks snail pace across the child to savor and taste what killing and death feel on an emotional level. Why would Stevenson explore that aspect of killing? I think it is because a quic murder is too normal, too known. We hear of those stories of people shooting stabbing running into others with their cars to kill people. But stepping on a child, snail paced and sadisticly, is something only a unrepressed human would think of doing. To feel the emotional toul of killing a child slowly, painful, enjoying the moment of it, is what Stevenson really wanted to show us about Hyde. To show us he isn’t just a criminal, he is an the incarnation of the serpent from