First, it is the idealism. Brutus is the idealist in the book who has perfect like with beautiful house and beautiful wife. Thus, he believes that the world could be idealistic too. Therefore, he chooses to kill Caesar for idealistic Rome without a leader who overpowers the citizens. Cassius understands Brutus’ idealism and uses it to destroy Caesar.
Brutus realized that eventually Caesar would give in to the people and his pride and accept the crown. It was because of this that Brutus knew that he would have to eliminate Caesar. He took no pleasure in the idea of Caesar’s death, but recognized the necessity of it. In his statement, he says he has no personal reason to “spurn” or despise Caesar but that “for the general” or for his nation he must be a part of the plot to kill Caesar. By rejecting his own personal feelings for his friend Caesar and instead acting on behalf of the Roman Republic because of a sense of civic duty he embodies the concepts and core foundations of a civic humanist
Brutus is a government official who leads one of the biggest assassination in Roman history. Brutus was an older man who is very wise, but sometimes he doesn’t think before he acts. In this case, he doesn’t think or take other people’s opinions into consideration. He starts out being a member in the assassination into one of the leaders. The reason the men are assassinations Caesar is because they think that Caesar is getting too much power going to overthrow the original government into an empire.
(Act2 Lines 14, 17-18) This is showing that Brutus is having a conflict with himself
In the play, Julius Caesar by written by William Shakespeare the extended view of Brutus in a result to his idealism. Brutus is convinced to kill Caesar, he was worried about about where Rome is heading as a country as Brutus was an honourable man. He decides to kill his close friend Caesar. Brutus was a very objective man, he didn’t base things on a personal side but always about the facts and what’s really happening.
He was unable to see through the fake letters that are supposedly written by the people of Rome, but in reality are being written as a scam from Cassius. Brutus interpreted these letters as a protest against Caesar. He believed the people of Rome were telling him their desires through this letter, he tries to resolve this by listening to the societies challenge to “speak, strike, redress” (II.i.47). Reading these letters from “random citizens” it is what finally pushes him over the edge.
Brutus’s idealism forced him to believe in these false encouragements and believed it was up to him. And when Antony convinces Brutus to allow him to speak at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus’s idealism is flawed due to him believing in everything everyone tells him, Brutus is
Julius Caesar, is a play based on the true events that occurred in Roman history. The play follows the fictional lives of Caesar and his people leading up to, and after his assassination. Several characters can be labeled as both villainous and heroic at different points in the play due to their actions, however, this does not apply to the character of Marcus Junius Brutus, who remains a hero through the entire play. Brutus is a hero for several reasons, The first reason Brutus is considered to be a hero is because he continuously stands up for what he believes in. Secondly, it is clear that Brutus is a hero because he kills himself as a sacrifice to the roman public.
There’s sometimes a struggle in life where you have to do something to make the best out of what’s coming from it. In Act III, Scene II, Brutus and Antony had a chance to give their explanation of what was tooken place at the Capitol. In “Julius Caesar” Brutus decided to do something for the best of Rome. Brutus killed Caesar even though he loved him a lot he knew it was the right thing. When Brutus said that about Caesar it meant that he was trying to protect Rome from Caesar’s decisions from being king.
All human beings are subjected to the flaw of submitting to their emotions, as seen in the characters Brutus and Cassius in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar. Brutus and Cassius are prime examples of how emotions can have overwhelming effects on the judgment of humans, no matter how strong or logical they may seem to themselves or others. Ultimately, these characters were forced to surrender under these emotions leading to the characters internal conflict and their downfall. Cassius and Brutus are prominent characters in the play and are known for their expertise in politics and warfare. Cassius is a skilled politician and military leader who becomes the driving force behind the conspiracy to assassinate Julius Caesar.
Brutus’s idealist view of Rome clouds his feelings for Caesar. Cassius is a jealous and vindictive person. Cassius’s realist view of the world, his mean and self serving nature leads Brutus and a group of other men down a vengeful path. During Act 1 Cassius notices that Brutus is acting differently.
Brutus is an honorable man who respects the people of Rome and will do whatever it takes to keep the peace. When he realizes his best friend is becoming too powerful he decides to take matters into his own hands. Caesar’s Ambition had him killed by one of the most respectable
The contrast is clear between Brutus and Cassius, who seem to never agree with anything throughout the play. Fate is Brutus and Cassius’s army being defeated by Marc Antony and Octavius, and losing everything they worked for. It can cause sympathy for readers because main characters in stories usually have a happy ending, yet these characters have a tragic ending and die in the end. The supernatural occurrence in the play is the ghost of Caesar, who visits Brutus and warns him of his fate at Phillippi. The pathetic fallacy being the way Brutus and Cassius’s army is so easily defeated, due to improper planning and high ground advantage.
Throughout the duration of the play numerous people attempt to expose Caesar of his domineering and autocratic power. Among these men are two preeminent characters, Marcus Brutus and Caius Cassius. However in comparison to Brutus, Cassius deserves to be the character memorialized and venerated as he asserts himself as a skillful Machiavellian leader that provides the ingenuity behind the plot to kill Caesar. In correlation Brutus is perceived as the noblest Roman, yet contributes nothing significant to advancing the plot of the play. Individually, the moral beliefs of each prominent character can attest to the notion of who should be respected, criticized or forgotten.
