ipl-logo

The Tension Between Vietnam And France In The 19th Century

1813 Words8 Pages

Stephen King once said, “Your own politicians make our Dr. Goebbels look like a child playing with picture books in a kindergarten. They speak of morality while they douse screaming children and old women in burning napalm. Your draft-resisters are called cowards and 'peaceniks.' For refusing to follow orders they are either put in jails or scourged from the country. Those who demonstrate against this country's unfortunate Asian adventure are clubbed down in the streets. The GI soldiers who kill the innocent are decorated by Presidents, welcomed home from the bayoneting of children and the burning of hospitals with parades and bunting. They are given dinners, Keys to the City, free tickets to pro football games." This quote represents the feelings of many Americans in the United States, but the citizens in Vietnam went through an inconceivable amount of pain and terror. The Vietnam War changed millions of lives. Tension arose between Vietnam and France in the 19th century. This was the beginning of what influenced the catastrophic war. France started immigrating southeast to Vietnam. The French government had the intention of gaining control of the potential trade industry …show more content…

This side still managed to win by using a war tactic that tired the American's and South Vietnamese militaries. South Vietnam was poor and going through big amounts of poverty. They depended on the United States to help them win. North Vietnam realized that they might have a chance to win. The Soviet Union trained and supplied North Vietnam with military weapons. South Vietnam also had a vulnerable organization. They were made up of mostly peasants who did not know how to fight but soon learned. A general of the North Vietnam troops once remarked about how the North knew their weaknesses and strengths. They also understood the war very well, more than South Vietnam's allies. Despite the violence of the war, North Vietnam did try to negotiate

Show More
Related
589 Words | 3 Pages

But, how does one win a war? Well, there exists multiple tactics to prevailing over the opposing side. There are certain resources to gain the upper-hand, like innovative technology, territorial schemes and environmental conditions. All of these elements helped the Northern forces prevail over the South, during the Civil War of 1861. After breaking apart from the North, the South focused on its slave economy.

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

The Vietnam War was a war which many people felt negative about, this attitude became especially true after the Tet Offensive took place. Northern Vietnamese forces attacked the South and Americans on the Tet Holiday in hopes to start revolutions in major cities. The outcome was decreased support for the war in America, slowed economy in the south, and a loss in moral for the north. The Tet Offensive proved to be a smart offense by the North, yet did not reach the desired outcome and was not a victory for either side.

Read More
174 Words | 1 Pages

English colonists were trying to push west, further into the New World. In doing this they went into the Ohio Valley making the French upset because they had already set up trade there. This caused the French to build military strongholds, the biggest being in southwest Pennsylvania, trying to keep the English out. Colonists in Virginia decided to retaliate against the French.

Read More
937 Words | 4 Pages

President Lyndon Johnson declared a campaign to win the “hearts and minds” of the Vietnamese, and the United States decisively lost that battle. At the beginning of Truong’s book he shares what ideas are going through his heart and mind, “I would have been willing to accept almost amy regime that could achieve real independence and that had the welfare of the people at heart. I was quite prepared to give Ho’s Northern government the benefit of the doubt on this score”(36). This quote illustrates the minds of a Vietnamese population desperate for independence in any form. They had been subjected to outside imperial forces for hundreds of years prior and were poised to accept any leader willing to help them to independence.

Read More
958 Words | 4 Pages

The clash between the North and South over slavery, states’ rights, and several other conflict led a civil war in the United States. The Confederate South, which is known for its profound military history, turned out to be no opposition for quickly developing North in the Civil War. The North that was industrialized, strongly equipped realized that a lot of their triumphs were somewhat easily obtainable. Strong leadership, number of troops, and economy are only few of the factors that led to the Union's victory over the Confederate succeeded states. Number of troops, army supply and finance of the war played a role in which side was to win the war.

Read More
190 Words | 1 Pages

But, the Southern will to fight is what allowed them to hang on so long through such a bloody war. In order to crush the Southern resistance, the North also made strong use of its military might,

Read More
962 Words | 4 Pages

The North tended to rely on brute force, and the ability to simply replace their casualties with more men. If the South was given this type of resource, it would have been a different war with different results. Through the use of brilliant documents, the North gained support from both citizens and border states and changed the emphasis of the war from preserving the union, to the issue of slavery, which people felt strongly about. The separate countries would not survive as well and as easily than if they remained unified. They worked off one another, economically, with the South providing the raw materials and the North providing the finished goods.

Read More
218 Words | 1 Pages

The North was a strongly communist and with the support of China since China is a communist country too. However, the south side was a strongly anti-communist politician. After a year, then president Dwight D. Eisenhower had pledged his firm support to Diem and South Vietnam. The Vietnam War had a lot impact on the life of Americans, including various spheres of public and private life.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

On April 4, 1967 Doctor Martin Luther King Jr gave the speech, “Beyond Vietnam-A time to Break Silence.” In this powerful speech Dr. King addresses his followers, and explains why the same people who are advocating for civil rights, should also protest the war in Vietnam. Dr. King’s main appeal is towards pathos because he is explaining his reasons, most of which are moral in some way. Dr. King develops the central claim of the speech by explaining how the war is taking away resources from the poor, how the soldiers are disproportionately poor people, and lastly how the war is completely against his morals. His central claim of the speech revolves around war being an enemy of the poor.

Read More
1091 Words | 5 Pages

The Vietnam War in American history exceeds a reputation of being one of the most unpopular, violent, and unnecessary in its time. Although there was a big support basis at the beginning of the war, many soldiers that were drafted or enlisted to fight realized the dangers of the event amongst each other, and had to help each other strive through to make it out alive and hopefully maintain a healthy conscious. During the times of war, relationships in the platoon can be rough, undesirable, and even violent in certain moments, but in reality, soldiers culminate into a brotherhood and family. At some points in war, many soldiers have rough relationships with their comrades.

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

This historical analysis will define the imperial impact of French colonialism and the influence of Chinese communism and on the Vietnamese people in the pre-WWII era. The important role of China in the development of Vietnam’s history is crucial to understand the ways in which foreign colonists could not sustain dominance over these peoples. In the past, Northern Vietnam had been a part of China, which defines the close relationship that these people had with a larger and more powerful empire in this region of the world. In the late 19th century and early 20th century, the role of China’s own nationalist movements had an impact on Vietnam’s own struggles in French-Indochina. The early focus on “nationalism” in China was going against western

Read More
1209 Words | 5 Pages

INTRODUCTION There 's so much grey to every story - nothing is so black and white. Same is true for French colonization in Vietnam that lasted more than six decades, being a part of so-called Indochina. The French government created an ideology to justify their expansion in Asia and Africa: “civilizing mission” in order to develop those regions and introduce modern political ideas, social reforms, industrial methods and new technologies.

Read More
591 Words | 3 Pages

The invasion kept going until France came and took over the country. In 1787, Nguyễn Ánh was the king of the Nguyễn dynasty. Because of his failure when the revolution happened, he has to asked for help from France. France accepted that and decided to use the Treaty of Versaille on Vietnam. In return the treaty, Nguyễn Ánh promised to cede Pulo-Condore to the French and to give a concession to the French in Tourane, as well exclusive trading rights.

Read More
901 Words | 4 Pages

So the people revolted to stop their control but the French fought back so the people had to start a war against France to get there freedom, because they had to listen to what they said. And because of their anger to the France the war that lasted eight years took place. At the end of the line the Vietnamese finally took back there control of their country after a century of suffering that they had to deal with. And because of the war they also lost some people 3,420 killed and 5,300 in the France tropes. And more lives were lost by the Vietnamese.

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

The soldiers in the Vietnams war were there for different reasons, some soldiers were forced against their will and some were there by choice. Because of that, each soldier has their own thoughts about the war, O’Brien has interpreted that “The twenty –six men were very quiet: some of them excited by the adventure, some of them afraid”. This clearly shows how the men

Read More

More about The Tension Between Vietnam And France In The 19th Century

Related Topics

Open Document