ipl-logo

The Texas Constitution: Redistriction In The United States

666 Words3 Pages

According to the Texas Secretary of State website, “Article III, Section 28, of the Texas Constitution requires the Texas Legislature to redistrict both houses (the Texas House of Representatives and Texas State Senate) at its first regular session after publication of the federal decennial census.” (https://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections/voter/faqcensus.shtml) The Texas Tribune describes the purpose of redistricting as equalizing the population in state and congressional districts after the census is published, and ensuring that minority populations are represented. (7) Gerrymandering is re-drawing these geographical boundaries to give a particular political party a numeric advantage over an opposing party. Texas history is rich with examples …show more content…

However, when the lines were redrawn in 1961, Harris County only represented by just one senate district. Additionally in 1961, a federal court ruled that the “Texas constitutional provision that restricted each county to one senator” was unconstitutional (Kilgarlin v. Martin). (9) In the 1964 US Supreme Court case, Reynolds v. Sims, the court upheld the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment and ruled that the lines for state legislative districts should be drawn to make them "as nearly equal of population as is practicable" and not be based on geography alone. …show more content…

House representatives from 30 to 32, which meant redrawing the maps. At that time, each party controlled one chamber of the state legislature and became deadlocked on the redrawn districts. A Federal court stepped in and provide one which gave the Democrats a 17 to 15 advantage. Republicans gained control of both the House and Senate in 2002, and House Majority Leader Tom Delay beginning negotiating redistricting to better reflect the Texas voters, which were primarily Republicans, in the U.S. House of Representatives. (14) Before finally approving the redistricting plan, Democratic legislators twice fled the state to prevent a quorum in the House. The plan ultimately passed, but it ended up before the Supreme Court. The court ruled that the state would have to adjust the district lines and submit the changes to the court for approval before the November election. Tom Delay was indicted on “state charges of illegally diverting money to the campaigns of state legislators who drew the map” and forced to resign his position.(14) The most recent case of gerrymandering began in 2011 when the Republican legislature redrew the congressional district maps based on the 2010 census. On May 10, 2017, federal judges ruled that Republicans racially (unlawfully) gerrymandered three congressional districts along racial lines in order to maximize the party’s changes to retain the seats, and to weaken the growing electoral power of

Show More
Related
1144 Words | 5 Pages

Peter Choi Professor Gadarian PSC 121: American National Government 1 October 2015 Congressman Billy Long of Missouri In 2010, Missouri’s 7th Congressional District elected Republican Representative Billy Long to office. Representative Long triumphed over his Democratic opponent by receiving 63% of the popular vote, which translates to 141,010 votes. Interestingly, the Republican primary election in 2010 was more closely contested than the general election. Similar election results occurred in 2012 as well.

Read More
377 Words | 2 Pages

The Constitution of 1876 and the Constitution of Texas are both incredibly influential to the government of Texas. Their importance lies in their ability to outline the structure of government, allocate powers between different branches, and establish the rights and responsibilities of both the government and the citizens. The Constitution of 1876, for example, involves the separation of powers, state government structure, Bill of Rights, legislative authority, and amending process. Meanwhile, the Current Constitution of Texas involves the outline of the state government structure, powers of the legislature, protection of individual rights, local government provisions, and the amendment process. Both the Constitution of 1876 and the current

Read More
229 Words | 1 Pages

Since 1980, the Republican candidate, running for President, has received a high percentage of the vote in Texas, than he did nationally. However, the thing that has changed between 1996 and now, is that their is a different distribution in the vote for President within Texas. During the time between 1960 and 1992, the Big 6 counties (those counties that consist of the largest cities in Texas) carried the GOP Presidential candidate (Thornburn 168). The only exclusion to this was Johnson in 1964. Now in 1996, they have produced the lowest percentage of the vote for the GOP candidate.

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

Because there are two practices for effective gerrymandering, there can be political advantages for the parties. The two successful practices are the “Packing a district” and “cracking a district” (Greer 1). The packing a district means to gain more and more districts in favor (Greer 1). This will cause less packing or votes to go to the opposed party. It is simple.

Read More
985 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution of the Republic of Texas was the supreme law of Texas from 1836 to 1845. On March 2, 1836, Texas declared itself an independent republic due to a lack of support from the U.S. in their revolutionary movement. The citizens of Texas approved an annexation ordinance and a new constitution on October 13, 1845. On December 29, 1845, the U.S. admitted the State of Texas to the Union. After the Texas voters ratified secession from the Union on February 23, 1861, the Secession Convention reconvened.

Read More
982 Words | 4 Pages

This allows the politicians to select one representative from each district to represent the majority of the voters in that district. This can benefit a political party because it allows them to have more seats in the house. “Eliminating gerrymandering would not by itself dramatically increase the competitiveness of house and state….between the two major political parties” (Mann, Thomas

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

To make sure they win a majority vote in every single district, they redraw the boundaries, so there is a slight majority of their supporters

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

The extremely poor education system in Texas has resulted in the lowest number citizens with high school diplomas and, therefore, an extremely low voter turnout. E.J. Davis led the most corrupt

Read More
1128 Words | 5 Pages

In 2008, the presidential election saw around 8 million voters in Texas come and cast a vote. As of 2012, the number decreased to around 7 million (TX Senate). Now it may not seem like that’s a lot but for something like an election, it could mean the difference of winning by a landslide or just a few

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution of 1876 remains the foundation of Texas's current system of government, having been drafted in the aftermath of the Civil War and Reconstruction era. The framers of this constitution sought to enshrine principles of limited government, fiscal responsibility, and local control as a reaction against the perceived excesses of Reconstruction. By examining the historical context and core tenets underlying the 1876 Constitution, one can better understand its enduring impact on Texas's modern governance. The 1876 Texas Constitution was drafted in the context of the Reconstruction era following the Civil War. During this time, the federal government exerted significant control over Texas, implementing the previous constitutions of

Read More
394 Words | 2 Pages

p. 275 There are 435 seats in the House of Representatives that must be distributed among the 50 states. Reapportionment is the process of redistributing the congressional seats among the 50 states. Some states might gain seats and some might lose seats.

Read More
597 Words | 3 Pages

There are some roles that the state have some restrictions being as a major. The state bureaucracy is largely controlled by multimember boards and commissions with the results that the state is fragmented. They have been saying that Texas needs it governor to have meaningful budget authority so the budgeting system encourages some control over the government. If Texas has a more powerful governor it could have the legislature’s power could have some decreasing in the state, but by doing this the democracy is better served when the legislature is the more

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

The One Party State- Texas had been governed by the Democratic party for over 100 years. But the pattern was broken when a competition

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

The history of political parties in Texas is marked by nearly a century of Democratic Party dominance followed by a realignment that shifted the balance of power in favor if the republicans. Political science professor Cal Jilson noted that the dominance of one party in Texas has been a result of the state’s dominant values. Both parties in Texas today reflect more conservative versions of their national counterparts. The other chapter talks about the Interest groups in Texas. Interest groups plays a critical role in all democratic systems of government.

Read More
1305 Words | 6 Pages

The Republicans have dominated Texas politics and want to maintain Texas as a solid red state of the south. By requiring voter identification at the polls, Republicans successfully lowers voter turnout for Democrats and continue their power. On the other hand, Democrats try to make their voices heard and argue that the voter identification requirement denies the fundamental right of citizens. Although the Supreme Court ruled that the law is unconstitutional, Texas politicians plan to appeal the Fifth Circuit's decision and bring the law

Read More

More about The Texas Constitution: Redistriction In The United States

Related Topics

Open Document