More handpicked essays just for you.
What does socrates argue in the crito
The trials and death of socrates compared to the society
Crito why socrates is not guilty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
However, instead of planning the escape Socrates started the dialog about why he would rather obey the law and be executed. At first, Crito presented two arguments to
In the reading, Crito came to Socrates requesting for him to escape prison. Crito presented some arguments as to why Socrates should leave while in return, Socrates presented counter arguments as to why he should stay. In the end, Socrates chose to stay in prison and go along with his death sentence. Socrates doing this was the correct choice because Crito failed to present a compelling argument to why he should leave (54-end). Socrates is already of old age, so why damage his reputation by escaping and living the little years he had left to suffer a lifetime of guilt, hatred, and throwing away a possibility for those left behind to witness the flaws in their governmental system.
To begin, I will be discussing the authors and his thesis. Apology, Crito, and Phaedo was written by Socrates’ apprentice Plato. In these books, Plato is narrating the events leading up to Socrates’ death. He begins in Apology tells us the readers of the court proceedings and conviction of Socrates. In this first narrative Plato is in the words of Professor Jeff McEwen “acting as a court scribe.”
Crito is distressed by Socrates reasoning and wishes to convince him to escape since Crito and friends can provide the ransom that the jury demands. If not for himself, Socrates should escape for the sake of his friends, sons, and those who benefit from his teaching according to Crito. However, Socrates denies the plan of escape. The three arguments to be acknowledged are as follows: the selfish, the practicality, and the moral. Socrates reason not to escape, Socrates explanation of the good life, and an objection for breaking the laws that would put no harm to his fellow citizens is
Crito was very persistent on convincing Socrates to escape his death by bring up many arguments. The first argument Crito had brought up was that he did not want to lose Socrates because he is a “one of kind” friend to him plus he implied his reputation will be tarnished due to not helping his special friend. Crito is worried that many people in society will look at him wrong for not helping Socrates during this difficult time. Crito second argument was basically advising Socrates that he should not be too harsh on himself for what he claimed in the court house regarding him not wanting to be an exile. Socrates’s Children were brought up in the third argument.
Crito was able to get passed the prison guards, in the morning, to find Socrates and try to convince him that he should escape from his jail cell. Crito and Socrates each provide arguments of why Socrates should escape, and Socrates provides his reasons of why he will not. The three arguments are if Socrates does not escape he will hurt Crito, if Socrates is worried what will happen to his friends and family, and lastly, if Socrates violates the agreement with the law. Socrates would rather follow the laws and have the death penalty then escape and flee to a different city. If Socrates does leave Athens then the people will most likely think that Socrates was guilty of the charges against him.
Crito accepts his arguments and Socrates decides he is going to
Jesus was a first-century Jewish preacher/religious leader who was considered the central figure of Christianity and is seen as one of the great minds that shaped western civilization; his teachings changed the course of western civilization and influenced where we are today. Jesus Christ had come to teach us about ethics, good and evil, and the solidification of the 10 commandments; but his death shone a light on his teachings and actions during his life, Jesus' death also replaced any significance of Socrates death. Jesus was crucified in 30 A.D in Golgotha or the "place of the skull" and the trial was recorded by Matthew, Luke, John, and Mark; the gospels. Furthermore, Jesus allowed himself to be put on trial because that was the purpose
Argument 1 and 3 Crito gives Socrates are about Socrates hurting him, by losing a good friend and he’ll have bad reputation. He’ll receive bad reputation
The Story of Crito by Plato is essentially a dialogue conversation between Crito and Socrates. Socrates is awaiting execution at the hands of the state. Crito has an elaborate plan in place to free Socrates from execution. Crito has paid the prison guard off so that Socrates can escape and has other loyalist to Socrates ready to help him escape and live his life in exile. Socrates is nearly 70 years old at the time and somewhat feels like his life is essentially already over.
To be just or to be served an injustice and obey, this is the very basis of the philosophical dialogue between Socrates and Crito. The Crito begins as one of Socrates’ wealthy friends, Crito, offers Socrates a path to freedom—to escape from Athens. Through the ensuing dialogue, Socrates examines, as a man who is bound by principles of justice, whether an unjust verdict should be responded to with injustice. In the dialogue between Socrates and Crito, Socrates outlines his main arguments and principles that prevent him from escaping under such circumstances. Socrates is under guard when Crito visits him, thus the plan to escape.
There is a political theory drawn from this text since politics affects the social domain and Socrates has introduced this political dimension through his reputation which Crito describes as social contract. The dialogue further asserts that laws and law enforcers ought to be fair in dispensing justice and as such should be fair. However this is contrary to what happens as Socrates is unjustly sentenced by his accuser. In common practice the feelings of discontent is normally expressed in any execution of justice and therefore this supports the political theory in this book.
Philosophy Thesis: In Crito, Socrates justifies the idea of the social contract to Crito, his strongest advice being that one should not return injustice to anyone, despite their outgoing treatments on others or on yourself, however, Socrates is hypocritical in saying that one should live freely and rightly so, but he himself chooses to die because it is just. We are introduced into the story by the disputive dialogue between Socrates and Crito regarding Socrates' escape and the opportunity for himself to be freed. Crito, a wealthy and great friend of Socrates, believes that Socrates should escape prison, and return to his home due to the misconceptions of higher authority that were proposed on Socrates based on his actions
Making enemies and becoming the topic of conversation, the Athenians began to view Socrates as a threat to their beliefs and way of life and sought to end it. In order to end this, Socrates was accused of blasphemy (Mod1SlideC7). Socrates’s accusers took him to court and after Socrates did not play their game by asking to be sent into exile, and in the end, he was sentenced to death. After reading the textbook and Plato’s writing influenced by Socrates, I realized that in the period of his life Socrates was indeed truly a threat to the Athens society, because he looked for answers that no one else bothered to find which challenged their culture.
Begin with the idea that Socrates knew he could escape the prison in which the city of Athens put him. The scene was set with
