The Use Of Metaphors In Fahrenheit 451 By Ray Bradbury

Fahrenheit 451 Fahrenheit 451, Which is viewed from many different perspectives makes the book reasonably complicated to understand. Fahrenheit 451, By popular Science Fiction artist, Ray Bradbury. Fahrenheit 451 won the Prometheus Hall of Fame Award in 1984 and the Retro Hugo Award for Best Novel in 2004. Society, In Fahrenheit 451 impacts An Individual’s and the entirety of Society’s ability to access knowledge and create their own values and Morals to a great extent. Bradbury expresses this by using Metaphors and the Setting of Fahrenheit 451. Bradbury Develops a theme by using his bias against television, He portrays this theme through the setting of the story and his use of Metaphors.
The setting in Fahrenheit 451 is shown by the use

The reason they lack these social skills is because they never had access to the knowledge they needed in order to engage in social interactions. This supports how not being able to access knowledge impacts an individual's ability to create their own values and morals because it shows how them not being able to access the knowledge they need for social interactions further impacts them by not allowing them to value social interactions or their relationships with others. Early in the story, Clarisse says, “ But I don't think it’s social to get a bunch of people together and then not let them talk, do you? An hour of TV

The author writes, “ We get these cases nine or ten a night. Got so many, starting a few years ago, we had the special machines built.” (13)What this shows is that people in this society have become so desensitized to their surroundings and have lost the care they should have for others. To further show this the number of cases they get a night shows how multiple don’t want to live anymore because they never understood the true value of life. The lack of knowledge they have from not being able to access it has impacted them negatively by making them lose their morals towards others in their community. Moreover, Bradbury Writes, “ The faces of those enameled creatures meant nothing to him, though he talked to them and stood in that church for a long time, trying to be of that religion, trying to know what that religion was, trying to get enough of the raw incense and special dust into his lungs and thus into his blood to feel touched and concerned by the meaning of colorful men and women with the porcelain eyes and the blood-ruby lips. But there was nothing, nothing.”(91) This shows how Bradbury compares the women to statues that have no meaning behind them and are somewhat like they don’t provide anything and simply just exist. These women have no morals or values because they are hardly people with lives. It further shows how empty these