Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Note on ethical dilemmas
Note on ethical dilemmas
Resolving ethical dilemmas
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Note on ethical dilemmas
When considering the beastie in the Lord of the Flies, Piggy and Simon's comments reveal that the boys' fear of the beastie could just be their own fears. Or, in other words, the beast on the island is them. Piggy first builds on this idea, saying that "I know there is no fear... Unless we get frightened of people" (Golding 84). Simon addresses this topic in a similar fashion to Piggy.
Once they kill Simon it explains deeply about how they kill him and how cruel and brutal it was. They kill him by biting and clawing and acting like savages. Simon says that it's themselves that is the beast and it shows in the part of the story how they act savage and
Simon knows that it's not possible what they are afraid of when they are searching for the beast and tries sharing that thought that maybe they are the beast but the rest of the boys weren't having it. “Simon, walking in front of Ralph, felt a flicker of incredulity—a beast with claws that scratched, that sat on a mountain-top, that left no tracks and yet was not fast enough to catch Samneric. However Simon thought of the beast, there rose before his inward sight the picture of a human, at once heroic and sick. (6.140)”Simon also always backed up his friends and helped them when they were in need. Like when all of the boys on the island were calling Piggy useless Simon stood behind him by saying that they use his glasses ““We used [Piggy's] specs...
The other boys start to fear the beast more and more, thinking it was a physical being, but Simon understands that it is not real and that it is only created by the boy’s fear. When Simon comes out of the forest to try to explain this to the boys, they mistake him for the beast and end up killing him. Simon's
maybe it's only us.’ " {Golding, 107} In this scene they are debating whether the beast is real or not and Simon says that it's not. Simon believes that there is no monster, but the fear that these boys are feeling is real. The beast continues to grow within their mind, but now they are taking action on what they believe to be the beast. In the text it states, “At once the crowd surged after it, poured down the rock, leapt on to the beast, screamed, struck, bit, tore.”
He begins to see all the damage they have done to the island and begins to realize that overtime they will end up scarce resources. Simon is the only one who doesn’t become a complete savage. He doesn’t have any determination to destroy and kill animals, he just wants to survive and do it in a respectful manner. From the beginning of the book Simon seemed different from the rest, he has a distinct view on life and what needs to be done. Simon is the only boy to truly grasp that "the beast" is just all the negative, horrible aspects of
None of the other boys consider simons point and move on. Simon was the first person to realize that the beast they fear is the beast they are and drives them to human evil. Simons idea is vague at this point ““There isn’t anyone to help you. Only me. And I’m the Beast. . . .
The beast was on its knees in the center, its arms folded over its face. It was crying out against the abominable noise something about a body on the hill. The beast struggled forward, broke the ring and fell over the steep edge of the rock to the sand by the water. At once the crowd surged after it, poured down the rock, leapt on to the beast, screamed, struck, bit, tore. There were no words, and no movements but the tearing of teeth and claws” (152) demonstrates that the fear of the beast controlled the boys, and influenced them to kill Simon.
. . maybe it's only us... Simon became inarticulate in his effort to express mankind’s essential illness” (89). As Simon realizes that “maybe it’s only us”, this reveals that the beast is not necessarily something that exists outside in the jungle. Rather, it already exists inside each boy’s mind and soul, the capacity for savagery and evil that slowly overwhelms them.
This shows that the boys are only afraid of themselves, because they are their own worst enemy. He is the first to figure out that the beast is not an actual beast, and how it is only the boys becoming savage, and starting to be afraid of one another. As Simon began to explain this to the doubtful boys, he was the only one who died knowing the
The boys kill Simon in the book because the boys think he is a form of fear, the beast. At first, the beast is nothing but the in boys imaginations, but then as time passes, they create images in their head of what the beast looks like. Simon awakens, and then finds the parachutist that frightened Sam and Eric. He then examines it and realizes it is not the beast. He attempts to go inform the others of what he sees, but the other see him as the beast because of his appearance.
CONFRONTATION FOR THE REAPPEARANCE OF CIVILIZATION “There is a savage beast in every man, and when you hand that man a sword or spear and send him forth to war, the beast stirs.” By George Martin. This commentary will talk about how William Golding has alluded to history to shape up the theme of this extract, which is civilization versus savagery. This extract talks about how Jack’s group, which is the savage group, stole Piggy’s glasses and how the civilized group prepares to confront them into returning them back.
The collective fear of the unknown leads to the untimely and accidental death of Simon. The distress present in the boys causes their impulsive action, of Simon’s horrific murder. Fear of “the beast” an imaginary creature causes the boys to act irrational, and provokes survival instincts as a result of life threatening terror. The fear of the boys in this moment is epitomized when they chant, “Kill the beast!, Cut his throat, Spill his blood!” (168).
Categorizing people’s acts is never easy and especially highly controversial, since there is no point, which decides, whether you belong to the first, second or even no group. However, below are some representational examples of artists and bands, who effectively contributed to the Sixties’ rebellious Counterculture movement. 4.8.2 Rock bands with political content: The Fugs (New York City): With the regular changes of line-up, the stable core ones had been drummer Ken Weaver, beatniks Tuli Kupferberg and Ed Sanders, the only remaining member until today.
Only Simon is able to recognize that the beast is not a monster or the pig's head, it is the evil that lives inside all the boys and the others on the island do not understand that.