“No sugar” utilises conventional language and generic ordering events convey the sympathetic and supporting response of the audience towards the Aboriginal people. Davis has incorporated the use of conventional language particularly focused on the character Mr Neville conveying his strength and power of the Aboriginal society. Throughout the play, Neville is referred to as, “My dear Minister” or “Sir” and so on to describe the power he has over other characters. This is a clear example of the formal language Davis uses and creates a sense of monotony and detachment to the audience basically the audience doesn’t really connect or relate to him as a character. Since Neville is main reason to the Aboriginals being forced out of their homes and segregated from the rest of society. …show more content…
This response of empathy for aboriginals is further enforced by the generic ordering of events throughout the play. “No sugar” follows the generic structure of events, first the opening of the play describing the characters then the problem Aboriginal segregation, finally the ‘happy ending’ of Joe and Mary leaving the town. Although this ending turns out great for Joe and Mary the audience is left wondering to what is left of the rest of the native people. This basic ordering of events allows for the audience to clearly understand the situation and the problems the aboriginals