Kaczynski's Existentialism Analysis

1144 Words5 Pages

This paper aims to shed light to the problems of the modern industrial society brought about by technology as supposed by Theodore Kaczynski. The paper would analyze Kaczynski’s stand on the matters of the society by contrasting and analyzing his thought with the existentialist thoughts of Martin Heidegger. This research shall tackle the three themes of existentialist philosophy, namely: freedom, anxiety and authenticity as found in the writings of Martin Heidegger in connection to the problems of the Industrial Society as presented by Theodore Kaczynski. The main focus of this research is on man and how he is affected by the changes in the technological advancements of the Industrial Society. The research shall answer the questions: What are …show more content…

First to be discussed of course is his concept of Sein or being, to give a comprehensive background on all other concepts and terms he would coin. After that would be to tackle concepts found in society like They-Self and Das Man, the anonymous crowd that he speaks of. It is vital for this project to glean his view on society at large in order to better understand how he views man or dasein particularly. Man according to Heidegger is a being-in-the world. He claims that man is immersed into the society. There is no distinction between the being out there, and the being that is man. And in this essence man, is in connection with others. Following this, the research will tackle the notion Heidegger about technology. Taking his position from his work Questions Concerning Technology, this thesis would stipulate all the important points he presented. For Heidegger there is two different modes of production. One is bringing-forth, the other challenging-forth. Bringing-forth is where man is the not the most important. Remembering the four causes of Aristotle, efficient, material, formal and final cause, where man is the efficient cause of things. And that would make it seem that man is the most important amongst the four. But for Heidegger that is not so. For him the four causes are co-responsible of each other. It was only men’s tasked to reveal the concealed. In this