ipl-logo

Theories Of Freedom Of Speech

997 Words4 Pages

Freedom of speech in the United States is guaranteed under the First Amendment. Despite this being a right, there are many different theories that have developed over the years in order to defend freedom of speech or arguments that wish to restrict speech more than it currently is. By comparing and contrasting the theories of free speech, I will explain why the law currently regarding freedom of speech is reaches the expansiveness in which the freedom should carry and the justification for it. Before the theories are explained, we should outline what parts of speech are currently not protected under the First Amendment. Unprotected speech includes obscenity (for example, works that lack serious value), fraudulent misinterpretation, defamation (written and spoken), fighting words (words likely to cause and average person to fight), and advocacy of imminent lawless behavior (Lecture 7). These four instances are not protected as free speech because they carry the weight to seriously injure someone physically, emotionally, or financially, specifically in the instances of fraud, defamation, advocacy of imminent lawless behavior, and fighting words. The first theory about the justification of expansive freedom of speech comes from John Stuart Mill and is called the “Utility …show more content…

However, I also believe Emerson leaves some room in his theory for unprotected speech. Regarding current unprotected speech, I believe his point of attaining the truth would mean he does not support defamation and fraudulent speech. Defamation and fraudulent speech would be the exact opposite of obtaining truth. His aim to ensure political participation would also not protect fighting words, imminent lawless behavior, or cases of obscenity, because they can carry the weight to obstruct people from partaking in not only political discussion and participation but also general

Show More
Related

Ashcroft V. Free Speech Coalition Case Study

547 Words | 3 Pages

The Free Speech Coalition claims that these prohibitions are overbroad and vague and,

Read More

Analysis Of Free Speech Follies By Stanley Fish

103 Words | 1 Pages

People have the tendency to take the First Amendment for granted, but some tend to use it to their favor. Stanley Fish presents his main argument about how people misuse this amendment for all their conflicts involving from racial issues to current political affairs in his article, Free-Speech Follies. His article involves those who misinterpret the First Amendment as their own works or constantly use it as an excuse to express their attitudes and desires about a certain subject matter. He expresses his personal opinions against those who consistently use the First Amendment as a weapon to defend themselves from harm of criticism.

Read More

Censorship In Fahrenheit 451 By Ray Bradbury

963 Words | 4 Pages

Elizabeth Purdy researched the difference between protected and unprotected speech and found this quote from a former justice: “Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. offered the classic example of the line between protected and unprotected speech in Schenck when he observed that shouting “Fire!” in a theater where there is none is not protected speech. Categories of unprotected speech also include: libel and slander, “fighting words,” obscenity, and sedition” (Purdy). In this article, the author discusses different types of censorship. She also mentions that some types of speech are protected by the First Amendment, while other types are not.

Read More

Censorship Of The First Amendment Essay

865 Words | 4 Pages

Censorship of The First Amendment This paper will discuss how censorship denies citizens of the United States our full rights as delineated in the First Amendment. It will outline how and why the first amendment was created and included in the Constitution of the United States of America. This paper will also define censorship, discuss a select few legal cases surrounding freedom of speech and censorship as well as provide national and local examples of censorship.

Read More

Annotated Bibliography On Overcriminalizing Speech

1204 Words | 5 Pages

The article argues that the courts should only view harmful speech in the same eyes and rule them the same as if they were conduct harms. The source then discusses how many scholars believe that freedom of speech only applies when the benefits outweigh the harms, regarding what is being said. The article does a good job of approaching the problem through a semi-neutral lens. The article clearly lets its opinion be known at times; however, it approaches the opposite side of the argument in a fair manner. The article will be incredibly beneficial because it discusses when freedom of speech should not apply with a neutral approach.

Read More

Essay On Texas Vs Johnson

747 Words | 3 Pages

For this essay I have picked symbolic speech and a seditious speech. All of these speeches come under the First Amendment of freedom of speech. This is controversial and generates lot of arguments sometimes on a national level. So, what is freedom of speech in reality? It states that “the United States Constitution prevents Congress from making any law respecting an establishment of religion, prohibiting the free exercise of religion, or abridging the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the right to peaceably assemble, or to petition for a governmental ...”

Read More

Charles Lawrence Racist Speech Summary

770 Words | 4 Pages

Borders of the First Amendment are at the center of the legal debates about free speech and hate speech. While free speech is considered to be a basic right, as the Supreme Court has given the right to free speech. However, when such "free speech" crosses the line and becomes a threat, the courts have stepped in and punished the speaker. First Amendment does not protect free speech that has the intention of doing harm or damage.

Read More

1st Amendment Importance

530 Words | 3 Pages

The Importance of the 1st Amendment In 1787 our founding fathers assembled the constitution of the United States of America. Of this which contains the most important document to the American citizen, the Bill of rights. The first Amendment states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” These freedoms granted by the Bill of Rights are often known as freedom of expression. These rights are most important to a truly free society. The first amendment provides us with new ideas and dismisses the fear of punishment

Read More

We The People Chapter 4 Summary

501 Words | 3 Pages

Chapter 4 of the book We the People talks about Civil Liberties, this chapter mainly talks about the Rights that were placed in the Constitution (not in the Bill of Rights), it also talks about the Bill of Rights and it describes the rights protected by the Bill of Rights. It also talks about specific rights that work close together with the Bill of Rights and Amendments rights. One of the first Amendments that is described in great detail is Freedom of Speech and Religion. The first Amendment protects US citizens right to talk about almost any topic in the United States. I said almost any topic because there are some forms of speech that aren’t protected by the First Amendment (these forms of speech can be limited or prohibited), some of the forms of speech that aren’t protected by the First Amendment are Fighting Words and Hate Speech, Student Speech, Libel and Slander speech.

Read More

The Stigma Of Homelessness

265 Words | 2 Pages

Runs past Hahnemann hospital at any time of day often result in two visuals: physicians and homeless people, with an emphasis on the 'and' as I've never seen the two groups interact. One morning as a member of Back On My Feet (a man from Africa with an impressive ability to remember names and faces) and myself ran past three homeless people, two sleeping on the sidewalk and one walking in circles, and towards city hall, I was struck with the thought of what it must be like for formerly or currently homeless members of BOMF to see other homeless people in the street, many of whom appear to be high and distressed. As we ran back toward the starting point, we passed physicians making their way to the hospital. In that moment, the bridging of two worlds seemed apparent and multilayered. Here I was, a medical student, seeing my own future in the young physicians who hurried past; here was a formerly homeless man potentially seeing his former self in the people we passed.

Read More

John Stuart Mill And Utilitarianism

719 Words | 3 Pages

Mill states that for the most part speech and discussions aren’t harmful to society, so it doesn’t violate the harm principle. There are two branches to his argument for the individual’s ability to freely speak his or her mind without repercussions. The first branch is that to suppress an individual’s expression of his or her opinion is an assumption of infallibility, which is to obstruct other opinions that criticize one’s own beliefs due to the assumption that your knowledge is errorless. The issue with restraining freedom of speech is that it prevents people from receiving the truth, because it is necessary to take in consideration all perspectives on a belief to come to a logical conclusion. Furthermore, this is detrimental on society because it isolates society from moral truths and affects the well-being on the individual and the overall group of people.

Read More

The Limitations Of John Stuart Mill And Freedom Of Speech

1301 Words | 6 Pages

In the society of today, discussion on the topic of freedom of speech is at a forefront. The question on whether there are any limitations on the freedom of speech is one which causes a constant battle between “right and wrong” within the media and with public institutions. The argument that there are no limitations to expression is one which bears a lot of support from not just the liberalist area of society, but also quite often draws a lot of support from the conservative part too, as it is something that allows both sides to express their opinions. The importance of expressing ones opinions is something that the philosopher and economist John Stuart Mill believes is a fundamental part of human liberty. It is certainly true that there are always more than one way of looking at a situation, and finding truth within a situation can only be found if there are no limitations to people’s freedom of expressing their opinions on the said situation.

Read More

Miecklejohn's Theory Of Freedom Of Speech

1657 Words | 7 Pages

For the majority of history, governments and societies obstructed free speech. However, since around the 18th century, countries have implemented freedom of speech in their laws. For example, the United States’ first amendment protects from the government interfering with freedom of speech. There are four theories that justify freedom of speech and expression: utility of truth, democratic self-government, individual self-realization, and mixed. Although these theories share some information and reasoning, they contrast each other through different ideas on how freedom of speech is justified.

Read More

Essay On Freedom Of Speech In Malaysia

965 Words | 4 Pages

Malaysian has the right to freedom of speech which is guaranteed by Article 10 of the Constitution of Malaysia. The Article 10 allows all citizens the absolute freedom as not restricted by the government. In Malaysia, Law such as Publications act and printing presses give the Malaysian authorities the control over all the media. Any act that against this law may lead to fines or in much extreme cases, prison sentence. Although Malaysia has the right to freedom of speech, the media are still being controlled by the government which restrict them to publish anything against the government.

Read More

Importance Of Freedom Of Expression In Malaysia

1026 Words | 5 Pages

As human beings, we are all born with an entitlement of freedom of speech or synonymously known as freedom of expression as it is a basic human right. It is stated in the Federal Constitution and it is important for us human beings to protect our rights to freedom of speech and expression as it is the backbone for a democratic society. Having the right to express oneself freely without any restrictions is an essential part of what it means to be a free human being. Article 10 in the Federal Constitution states that; (a) every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression; (b) all citizens have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms; (c) all citizens have the right to form associations.

Read More

More about Theories Of Freedom Of Speech

Related Topics

Open Document