Thesis Statement For The Affordable Care Act (ACA)

Thesis Statement

The Affordable care act mandates that certain specification be met by employers despite their religious and political views. With the freedom of employees to choose their workplace based on principles and beliefs in mind, it should be up to the employer’s discretion whether or not to provide certain insurance benefits. There was a great deal of litigations filed against the Obama Administration following the passing of the Affordable Care Act. In this essay, I will argue that the majority ruling in favor of certain companies was just.

Introduction (ACA)

The affordable care act is a United States Federal Statue that was enacted under the Obama Administration in 2010. Since the the passing of Medicare in 1965, the ACA was considered the most forward advancement in the United States Healthcare System. The goal of the ACA was to focus on the inclusion of the entirety of the United States, rather than just a portion of our country. Prior to the

The objective of this law was to protect business’ and their interests in religious practices. It states that “governments should not substantially burden religious exercise without compelling justification” and “the compelling interest test as set forth in prior Federal court rulings is a workable test for striking sensible balances between religious liberty and competing prior governmental interests.” Meaning that unless there is some form of justification (general wrongdoing or individual endangerment), if an individual of employer in this case feels as if their religious freedom is being violated, they have viable standing to litigate. Although this law was amended in 1997, there are currently 21 states that have their own version of the RFRA enacted by their legislature. There are copious litigations filed as a violation of the RFRA, however with the passing of the Affordable Care Act, dozens more