These three philosophers present their own arguments about the existence of God. One philosopher Thomas Aquinas present the better argument in one’s opinion because he argues that everything that has breath must have a creator and this is the only thing that makes sense of what these philosophers say. God does exist not for what these three philosophers say but God exists for the faith of what the Bible says.
Anselm’s argues that he is supposed to seek God with his whole heart, but how can he seek someone he has not seen. Anselm argument is about God’s existence, comparing God’s, existence of a painting. Anselm argues a painting is a creation that was once an idea in a painter’s head, but that does not mean the idea of the painting was not always alive. In disagreement it is clear that Anselm is a new Christian, because this is what new Christian’s struggle with or complain how they cannot see God so why do they need to seek someone they cannot see with their whole heart. The strength of his argument is Anselm has a point that everybody comes across at one point in their lives that one cannot see God and it is up to this person to put their faith in God. God does want his creation that is us to have a choice in his own existence and he wants his creation to have faith in its own existence. For example in opinion, in Genesis, God knew when he told Adam and Eve not to eat of that tree that they were going to eat from the tree anyway. This reason was that God wants us