ipl-logo

Nagel's Argument Against Psychophysical Reductionism

1672 Words7 Pages

Hunter Zappia
Prof. Jackson
PHI 370
ID#:110906542

Prompt # 1 (Thomas Nagel: What is it like to be a bat)

Word Count (not including main quote/citations): 492

In this essay I will discuss 3 important points that stem from Thomas Nagel’s paper “What is it like to be a bat.” The first thing I will do in this paper is define psychophysical reductionism and explain why Nagel is arguing against using such a straightforward psychophysical reduction. Secondly, I will explain how Nagel’s bat example ties into his argument against using psychophysical reductionism to explain psychological phenomena. And lastly, I will argue that Nagel’s two-pronged conclusion is most likely “at worst unprovable.” First we need to define what is psychophysical reductionism …show more content…

Nagel offers the example of the bat and states that one could try to imagine what it is like to be a bat by “imagining some combination of additions, subtractions, and modification”(Nagel 5). However, we can see that this imagining would only tell us what it is like for ourselves to be a bat. This is important because it shows that, although we can break down the objective properties of a bat, it doesn’t allow us to understand the bats subjective character. Lastly, the two-pronged conclusion. As of now psychophysical reductionism seems to be “at worst unprovable.” I am arguing this because reductionism is inherently flawed due to its inability to explain the most important part of the mind-body problem, consciousness. If we attempt to use it to explain the subjective character of another being we end up at the same roadblock, an inability to imagine their subjective experience. So it is at worst unprovable because the theory cannot explain consciousness we must, therefore, look for another theory that can both incorporate and explain the physical and subjective characteristics of …show more content…

I will be analyzing Jackson’s thought experiment and explaining important elements that come up in it. To do that, I will first define two important terms that Jackson uses in his paper, physicalism and the knowledge argument. I will then discuss how Jackson's thought experiment, Mary, ties into his knowledge argument and how he uses it as contradictory evidence against physicalism. Lastly, I will explain why Mary’s newfound knowledge of other people’s experiences is a critical element to Jackson’s knowledge

Show More
Related
702 Words | 3 Pages

level of explanation approach is put forward about the biological part of psychology. Those who support this view consider if psychology is a knowledge and psychology not different from biology, physics, or sociology. One of the people that support this view is David Myers. After David Myers, one that supports the level of explanation approach is Stanton Jones. He’s a psychology at Wheaton College.

Read More
1261 Words | 6 Pages

In the 1963 philosophy paper titled “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?”, Edmund Gettier attempts to deconstruct and disprove the philosophical argument that justified true belief is knowledge. Justified true belief, also commonly referred to as JTB, is used as a certain set of conditions that are used to explain someone s knowing some sort of proposition p. More specifically, JTB is used to say that s has knowledge of p if and only if p is true, s believes that p is true, and s is justified in believing that p is true. Gettier offers main points as the conclusion of his argument against this claim. First, he states that s can be justified in believing that p is true while p is actually false.

Read More
1919 Words | 8 Pages

Conclusion: The mind is substantively different from the body and indeed matter in general. Because in this conception the mind is substantively distinct from the body it becomes plausible for us to doubt the intuitive connection between mind and body. Indeed there are many aspects of the external world that do not appear to have minds and yet appear none the less real in spite of this for example mountains, sticks or lamps, given this we can begin to rationalize that perhaps minds can exist without bodies, and we only lack the capacity to perceive them.

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

Diane Ackerman, in her excerpt from “In Praise of Bats,” wants readers to recognize that life is beautifully strange, and it is the small moments that count. Ackerman takes on a gentle, calm tone to get her message across; to do this, she gives readers vivid imagery of bats, relating them to the beauty and abstractness of life. With the short-lived event of the event of the emergence of bats, Ackerman develops her meaning that the miniscule, seemingly insignificant moments in life is what we should look forward to the most. Ackerman introduces her excerpt with the brief description of her pet bats, Zuri and Rafiki: Zuri licking the “human essence” off of himself in an effort to show that he is distinct from the author and reader.

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

Meaning of Life What is life? What is the meaning of our existence? These existential questions were asked by almost every individual alive at some point in their life. Over the years many philosophers have come up with individual explanations to why they believe life can be unreasonable, futile, the will of god, or just simply meaningless.

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

The second question with the problem with humans is “what are the innate predispositions of men?” (Becker, 1971, p. 116). The third question with the problem with humans is “what types of personality are most valued” (Becker, 1971, p. 116). The fourth question with the problem with humans is “what are the modes of relating to others” (Becker, 1971, p. 116).

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

His argument criticizes physicalism; he claims that even if all physical knowledge is explained or known, there is still the question of experience. Jackson refers to these subjective, non-physical properties—experience—as qualia (Jackson). Qualia must be the consequence of the physical processes that Mary studied in Jackson’s knowledge argument. Jackson’s argument solely concludes that non-physical properties exist, but he does not argue how qualia affect the physical world (Jackson).  There are two views that a property dualist can take from Jackson’s conclusions: qualia come from physical processes and can have an effect on the physical world or that qualia are a result of physical processes but do not affect the physical world.

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

He explains how we can try to imagine what being a bat would be like (e.g., using sonar, sleeping upside down, eating bugs) but this is just what it is like for us to be a bat and not what it is like for a bat to be a bat. Nagel claims that even if humans were able to metamorphose gradually into bats, their brains would not have been wired as bats from birth; therefore, they would only be able to experience the life and behaviors of a bat, rather than the mindset. Such is the difference between subjective and objective points of view. Nagel argues that consciousness has a subjective aspect, and that understanding other mental states is difficult or impossible for those not able to experience those mental states.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

In his philosophical thesis, of the ‘Mind-Body dualism’ Rene Descartes argues that the mind and the body are really distinct, one of the most deepest and long lasting legacies. Perhaps the strongest argument that Descartes gives for his claim is that the non extended thinking thing like the Mind cannot exist without the extended non thinking thing like the Body. Since they both are substances, and are completely different from each other. This paper will present his thesis in detail and also how his claim is critiqued by two of his successors concluding with a personal stand.

Read More
1861 Words | 8 Pages

However, due to the limitation of skills, most of the researches done are not well designed. A main limitation of psychology as a field of study is that it never captures the nature of consciousness (Willig, 2013), as human mind is bound up with meanings and interpretations which differ from one individual to another

Read More
1006 Words | 5 Pages

Modern psychology now bases its theories in feasibility and replicability. The fact that most of the constructs in Freud’s theory such as the id, ego and superego cannot be tested and proven has made the theory invalid today. On the other hand, behaviorism is still very valid as its based on scientific laboratory experiments. Behaviorism has been replicated in many studies with the same results being achieved. The theory is still valid in modern therapeutic applications through behavior modification and behavioral therapy e.g flooding and shaping.

Read More
1322 Words | 6 Pages

Throughout the theory Freud mentions how there are parts of us psyche come together and make up our perception and our unconscious. Freud also

Read More
1590 Words | 7 Pages

The overabundance of clinically rooted concepts begin to put threat onto the clinical field as such excess of clinical strategies and techniques are mutually incompatible will create a nearly impossible issues in the conduction of psychoanalytic knowledge and skills. (Nunberg, NCBI, 1943) According to Nunberg, NCBI, (1943) the last 30 years; advancements in every aspect of the field in neuroscience have invalidate the basis for the earlier psychoanalytic which result to neglecting this field. Neuroscientists are not anymore troubled with mental disabilities or even organic disorders. Current evaluations of neuroscientific work approve that most of Freud original studies in this field including his works on the universal influence of non-conscious processes and the organizing function of emotions for thinking, have been discovered validity in scientific

Read More
1573 Words | 7 Pages

In 1923, Sigmund Freud proposed his theory that the make-up of an individual’s personality is largely governed by three fundamental components: the id, the ego, and the superego. Working through the unconscious and shaping behavior according to psychological fixations and conflicts or lack thereof, these elements evolve through five levels of psychosexual development (Freud, 1962). However, in spite of its compelling approach to the phenomenon, Freud’s structural theory of personality is riddled with limitations and as such, is subject to much criticism. The mind is layered into three states: the conscious, referring to the thoughts currently in our forefront; the preconscious, idle thoughts that can be easily accessed and brought to the conscious; and the unconscious, which houses the more instinctual drives that are repressed because it threatens the conscious’ equilibrium (Cloninger, 1996).

Read More
1689 Words | 7 Pages

The constructivist approach, which James favours in this statement, relies on higher cognitive information either from past experiences or stored knowledge in order to makes inferences about what we perceive (McLeod, 2008). In contrast, the direct perception approach limits itself only to information in the environment (Norman, 2002). These two competing theories will be discussed in relation to the above quote by William James, accomponied by evidence of their support or opposistion of said

Read More

More about Nagel's Argument Against Psychophysical Reductionism

Related Topics

Open Document