Some may say the government did violated carpenters fourth amendment rights; however, if he had nothing to hide then why does the government need a warrant carpenters rights were not violated. Therefore, the court was correct in making the punishment for Timothy carpenter. The defendant in the case, Timothy Carpenter, was convicted and sentenced to 116 years in prison for his role in a series of armed robberies in Michigan and Ohio. At his trial, prosecutors introduced Carpenter’s cell phone records, which confirmed that his cellphone connected with cell towers in the vicinity of the robberies. Carpenter argued that prosecutors could not use the cellphone records against him because they had not gotten a warrant for them, but the lower courts disagreed. During, …show more content…
When does the line get drawn for personal privacy? Timothy carpenter is arguing these questions in his court case. Carpenter believes that his personal privacy was interrupted by not only the government but by his cell phone carrier. Argument 3: Will the Fourth Amendment protect 21st-century data? The court confronts the third-party doctrine. A.In Carpenter, the FBI accessed location data linked to Timothy Carpenter and his co-defendant’s cell phones in its attempt to place the suspects at the sites of several robberies. But the data the FBI asked for and received weren’t limited to the days and times of the known robberies – they also included months of records that could reveal everywhere the defendants were every time they made or received a phone call. And the FBI got all of this information without a warrant. B.These data, maintained by wireless carriers, are records of the cell towers our phones connect to every time they try to send and receive calls, texts, emails and any other information. The records – generated hundreds and sometimes thousands of times per day – include the precise GPS coordinates of each tower as well as the day and time the phone tried to connect to