ipl-logo

Too Fishy For My Taste Judas Analysis

820 Words4 Pages

Bill McEwen’s article, “ Too Fishy for my Taste Buds” really captures the view of the poorer people. It gives a better understanding of what exactly the River Plan is. I chose this article because it has more of a logical way of thinking. I believe his credentials because he’s been in his business for 35 years. His reference, Senior Vice President, and executive Editor of the Fresno Bee, said that McEwen is passionate about his work. He works hard, and leave’s a great impression. The Fresno Bee is published in Fresno, California. It reaches the surrounding areas of the San Joaquin Valley. The newspaper began in 1922, the founders were brother Charles Kenny, and Valentine Stuart. On average the newspaper receives 8.6 million views on their page. I disagree with the River Project. I believe the SJRP is a waste of money. It doesn’t make a lot of sense to waste billions on salmon, and not as much on actual people. The River Project plans to use billions of dollars to save fish, but it doesn’t benefit the …show more content…

The loss of water would be immense. “In addition, agriculture isn’t a monolith. The restoration plan hits some farmers harder than others.” (Bill McEwen). The farmers have crops to grow, and fields to tend. With the River Project, all the water that the farmers need will be used to help restore the salmon. Farmers don’t just grow the crops for themselves. It’s for everyone else as well. Within a couple of years, there won’t be any need for that project, and all that money and water will have gone to waste. “And it’s coming at a time when water shortages already are killing the Valley’s west-side, farm-based economy.” (McEwen) The people are afraid that this project will worsen things. With a drought happening, there’s no room for extreme uses of water. There’s really no use for the water to be used for anything other than the people. It seems as if the salmon is more important than actual

Open Document