ipl-logo

Too Fishy For My Taste Judas Analysis

820 Words4 Pages

Bill McEwen’s article, “ Too Fishy for my Taste Buds” really captures the view of the poorer people. It gives a better understanding of what exactly the River Plan is. I chose this article because it has more of a logical way of thinking. I believe his credentials because he’s been in his business for 35 years. His reference, Senior Vice President, and executive Editor of the Fresno Bee, said that McEwen is passionate about his work. He works hard, and leave’s a great impression. The Fresno Bee is published in Fresno, California. It reaches the surrounding areas of the San Joaquin Valley. The newspaper began in 1922, the founders were brother Charles Kenny, and Valentine Stuart. On average the newspaper receives 8.6 million views on their page. I disagree with the River Project. I believe the SJRP is a waste of money. It doesn’t make a lot of sense to waste billions on salmon, and not as much on actual people. The River Project plans to use billions of dollars to save fish, but it doesn’t benefit the …show more content…

The loss of water would be immense. “In addition, agriculture isn’t a monolith. The restoration plan hits some farmers harder than others.” (Bill McEwen). The farmers have crops to grow, and fields to tend. With the River Project, all the water that the farmers need will be used to help restore the salmon. Farmers don’t just grow the crops for themselves. It’s for everyone else as well. Within a couple of years, there won’t be any need for that project, and all that money and water will have gone to waste. “And it’s coming at a time when water shortages already are killing the Valley’s west-side, farm-based economy.” (McEwen) The people are afraid that this project will worsen things. With a drought happening, there’s no room for extreme uses of water. There’s really no use for the water to be used for anything other than the people. It seems as if the salmon is more important than actual

Show More
Related
134 Words | 1 Pages

It was a right thing to bring back the river, not only to bring back the Salmon , but also to help the environment. Daniel Weintraub writes, “... the warring parties.. are working together on a project that should benefit the environment.. fishing industry and local economy”(3).This affirmation is describing that not only are the warring groups coming together, but they are helping the environment by bringing back the river. To bring back the San Joaquin

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

The San Joaquin River is an important river because its Central California’s largest river, supporting endangered fish and wildlife, communities, and one of the most productive agricultural regions in the world .The article “River Plan Too Fishy for my Taste Buds”,whom it was by Bill McEwen. The newspaper that featured this article is Fresno Bee on March 26,2009.Fresno is surrounded by farms so it would anti big business and government. McEwen is a credible writer because he is a veteran journalist,a sports and news columnist,and an opinion page editor. I think this author is a credible writer because he spent his life writing.

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

Paul Galley an accomplished environmentalist enters the controversial debate about Hydrofracking in New York, with his article “Hydrofracking: A bad Bet for the Environment and the Economy” published in the Huffington Post on January 05, 2012. Galley states “Net-Net, fracking is simply bad bet” fracking poses serious risk to New Yorkers. Galley, president of Hudson Riverkeeper has worked for over twenty-five years to protect the environment and support local communities, as a non-profit, public official and educator. This piece continues his devotion to protection of the Hudson River, and the drinking water supply of New Yorkers. Galley effectively convinces his audience through his use of appeals to pathos and logos that hydrofracking will have negative impacts on New Yorkers.

Read More
120 Words | 1 Pages

If Washington and Kanes counties could avoid the pipeline all together if they worked harder to conserve water. In my opinion the pipeline is a project that shouldn't be put into action.

Read More
1678 Words | 7 Pages

“ In the 20 years since water from the Colorado River was first applied to lands in the Wellton - Mohawk area, reclamation of irrigable lands has resulted in high crop yields and correspondingly high annual agricultural income.” The income from the crops was found to be $37 million which was more than one half, 66 million dollars which was invested by the U.S “, Wellton- Mohawk and Drainage district to the project, which comes off negatively because their profit was not good. The data recorded here was based off of the year 1974 and its crops and money made. “ The impact on population in Yuma County would be quite noticeable upon complete

Read More
832 Words | 4 Pages

In the years following World War I the increase in farmland only continued, but while farming stayed on an upward trend the average amount of rainfall per year was on a downward trend. As they reached the depression in the mid 1930’s the Great Plains states were in a drought falling from an average of 33.4 inches of rain a year to as low as 9.7 inches, while anything lower than 20 inches being considered catastrophic (Document E). This drought on its own would not have been problematic if not for the ever increasing amounts of topsoil that was left vulnerable by the farming methods of the time. All the loose topsoil due to farming methods hit by a nearly decade long drought and hard winds completely lifted the topsoil off of the ground and blew it away. Topsoil that originated in Texas was blown as far away as New

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

Some complain that the deal will put massive amounts of Colorado River water in the hands of “Indian water czars. " Some people question

Read More
897 Words | 4 Pages

I can see it through the thing that the main character who can be an environmental protection or a biologist said about the Endangered Species Act also the place where she is working. They are trying to protect the salmon and it is the right thing to do with the endangered species. “Protecting an endangered species means changing the practices in an entire ecosystem to safeguard their survival. It means managing the loss of their habitat, the turbidity of their waters, the surface water runoff from the streets that threatens them, and the effluents from the wastewater that disrupt their endocrine systems and, if unchecked, will cause their extinction.” (Keith, 1) When you change any ecosystem of any species will be at high risk when that species do not adapt to the new environment, but with the management and gradual change, we really can save the species is nearing extinction.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The confusing part is, is that the government spends $1,000,000 flying in bottled water. Instead of giving these First Nations only $250,000 to fix their treatment plant give them some of the $1,000,000 that 's spent

Read More
1425 Words | 6 Pages

For example, “on the Columbia river, which 100 years ago boasted the largest runs of Chinook, Coho and steelhead on the face of the globe, these same fish have declined to the point of receiving serious consideration for the federal government’s threatened or endangered species list.” The deterioration of the wild salmon, according to Brown, is from logging, overfishing, hatcheries, and dams, basically all human related activities. Logging and clear-cutting damages all habitats and “literally flattens many creatures chances for life.” For the salmon it causes blockades that disrupts the fishes migrating patterns, or ruins their spawning grounds all together simply from trees being dragged across the stream beds.

Read More
253 Words | 2 Pages

I think a huge problem in our society is all this talk about the North Dakota Pipeline. In my honest opinion i think it is wrong. There is many people who use the water supply and if something happens with the pipeline it could contaminate the Native Americans water supply. There is many people who count on the water and use it everyday for cooking, cleaning, and drinking. If they go through with the pipeline act it could kill many Native Americans because we need water to survive.

Read More
1245 Words | 5 Pages

The environment is one of the key points of our energy productions; without it, the U.S and other countries won’t get their resources they need to survive. But there are some people who don’t want hydropower to block waterways and want the dams that produces energy to be torn down. In “Stop Wasting America’s Hydropower potential” it talks about the environmental issue it has from a certain group who wants dams to be torn down. “Compounding the roadblocks are environmental groups that claim to adhere to sound science but hold remarkably outdated views of hydropower and its benefits. Rather than acknowledge technological advances and the environmental safeguards in our laws, these groups have filed lawsuits to dismantle dams or stop their construction” (Murkowski 8).

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

The canals next to the Nile will fill with the Nile floodwater. At the same time, the floodplains are then are then covered in a new batch of dirt that will later help crops

Read More
1703 Words | 7 Pages

As Kitson (2009) notes, "the hydropower projects, in many ways, represented a new form of colonization, as indigenous peoples were excluded from the decision-making process and bore the brunt of the social and environmental impacts of the dams" (p. 630). This lack of consultation and collaboration with Native American communities during the planning and approval of hydropower projects has been a significant challenge in mitigating their impacts. In fact, as Deloria and Lytle (2011) explain, "the United States government, which had a trust responsibility to protect tribal lands and resources, had approved the dam without consulting the tribal nations that would be most affected by it" (p.

Read More
265 Words | 2 Pages

The use of river water was used to provide water to their farm but to do that they had to use irrigation to control where the water go. Water could not be drinking

Read More

More about Too Fishy For My Taste Judas Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document