ipl-logo

Total Recall: We Can Remember It For You Wholesale

794 Words4 Pages

The 1990 movie Total Recall starring Arnold Schwarzenegger is adapted from Phil P Dick’s sci-fi story “We Can Remember It for You Wholesale.” Although added some dramatic effect into the movie which potentially makes it more appealing to audiences, the film is noticeably inferior compared to the original book. Why the movie is not comparable to the original film lies in both the inherent limitation of motion pictures as a medium and the unwise massive change to the plot by screen story writers.
There is no perfect form of medium. However, Total Recall, being a sci-fi movie, has some serious intrinsic limitations engraved in its bones. The life cycle of a sci-fi movie is significantly shorter than that of a sci-fi novel. Movie presents the world …show more content…

The Total Recall is more of a western action film than it is a science fiction movie. The movie is made overly dramatic by adding plots and characters didn’t exist in the book. The protagonist of the movie should be an idea, and this idea “must be truly new… and it must be intellectually stimulating (Phil P Dick My Definition of Science Fiction)”. Yet what we see in the movie is dozens of characters – good and evil ones – and hours of fight and violence is added to emphasize the heroism of our main character Quail, and the philosophical questioning of real throughout the book is substituted with cliché Hollywood formula of “A man gets over massive problems and find his true love, incidentally saved the planet”. So, Total Recall lacks both idea and freshness to be a sci-fi while intense gunfight makes it share more similarity with western action film. Not only the movie is too dramatic, the credibility of the movie is substantially lower than that of the original book because of those added plots. The book does not have many scientific or logical errors since it is predominantly the real world with only one tweak. The movie, however, not only makes out a Mars city, but also faked a method to create an atmosphere on Mars. Those scientifically impossible plots and objects will constantly pull audiences out from the movie and realize that all the confliction and drama cannot happen in any circumstances. Their thought process cannot go very deep before they are pulled out again and again by the fakeness of the world building. That’s where all the gunfight and drama comes in handy though, at least audience have something to watch and not think about. If audiences can’t merge in the story when they are watching the movie, it can never be successful. In all, mistakes made during making the movie made it an inferior adaptation of the

Show More
Related
288 Words | 2 Pages

But it does not really sum up the enjoyable book by Esther Forbes. Without all the details and struggle between each chapter of the novel, the movie is not as

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

Even though the book and movie and the movie have similarities they also have lots of differences

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

“It does not really match up to the book. The effects are cool, but it does not add up to the novel. I was literally screaming at the TV because of everything that was different… 5. The war was supposed to start and end in a second.” This quote is a review over the movie by “the little nightmare”

Read More
523 Words | 3 Pages

All of the characters personalities in the movie were so bland and boring. The events that happened in the movie looked way different than the same events that were pictured from the book, in the book, in a certain event that America was screaming, swearing and throwing objects everywhere and breaking stuff but, in the movie America screamed at Rosie and swore a little bit then ran out of the room. In the movie, the acting was kind of laid back and made every exciting part of the movie less exciting.

Read More
710 Words | 3 Pages

For example, in the book, when Inigo and Fezzik visit they have to go through many hardships in the Zoo of Death. Arabian Garstini, a very dangerous snake, is one of the animals in the Zoo of Death. Suddenly it starts coiling around them “and the fourth coil, the final coil, [coils around their] throat” which is terrifying. This builds a lot of tension and causes the readers to really get involved in the story. But, in the movie, there is no Zoo of Death and Fezzik and Inigo easily go inside the Pit of Despair.

Read More
1142 Words | 5 Pages

but I liked the changes because it added more conflict and drama to the story line which made the movie more interesting to

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

If I didn 't have the book I still think that I would be able to follow along with the movie and know what is going on. I really did like the story. It was different than any other books. It was funny and adventures but at times it was very mature. The lesson that anyone can learn is don 't change something you believe in because other people say it is not true.

Read More
937 Words | 4 Pages

The usage of techniques in the book convey a whole new story experience for readers, something that a movie can’t do. Both the book and movie offer excellent descriptions, but the movie falls short when compared to how detailed the book is. For instance, there is a lengthy and detailed description

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

The movie was much more detailed than the book, therefore making the movie better. In the movie all the characters spoke and had lines. But, in the book the characters barely even spoke. Also, in the book the author was just stating facts and not showing as much detail or action as in the movie. The movie is much more interesting because in the book, they only really focus on NASA and them working to launch a man into space.

Read More
426 Words | 2 Pages

While this movie does a great job of making history exciting, I feel the writers could have been more honest and the movie would have kept its

Read More
1395 Words | 6 Pages

I think that this is partly because action movies tend to sell a lot better, as well as capture the attention of most people. In the film, we got to see more of people interacting with each other during the global chaos, as opposed to having a deeper focus on the zombies themselves. I think that film wouldn’t have been as good as it is, had they tried to focus more on the same things the book focused on (the zombies, for example). Had they made it like the novel, it might have become

Read More
238 Words | 1 Pages

You nailed on the head in your opening sentences. In the past, I have heard many say the book was better than the movie. The point you made about, “holding the integrity of the piece and pleasing the original writer,” states a strong point-of-view. I remember watching the movie “Precious” starring Mo’Nique and Gabourey Sidibe, based on the novel “Push,” however, I soon learned the movie didn’t do the book any justice. That said, it was quite hard to watch the movie itself, however, the story was conveyed in a satisfactory way in the eyes of the original writer.

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

The film possess a style that is so largely invisible and difficult for the audience to see. It was very effective in convincing us that what we see on the screen is real, that we have to forcibly remind ourselves “it’s only a movie”. You can break down a classical Hollywood narrative into three different acts: the setup, the development, and the resolution. In the setup we are introduced to the main characters in the story, their goals, and their obstacles they face to achieve those goals. We are introduced to the problem in the beginning of the movie.

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

However, when I watched the movie, I felt as though everything I had imagined in my head from reading the book was wrong. Although, this might be the case since I read the book first, and then compared it to the

Read More
786 Words | 4 Pages

When one watches a movie, the experience is not life changing no matter how thrilling the experience was. It is not engraved into the brain as it is only a temporary adrenaline rush. When watching a movie, one feels as though one is watching the story from outside and not truly experiencing it through the main character. In addition, movies are often two hours long. If a movie was based on a book, which it often is, there would not be enough time to include minor details.

Read More

More about Total Recall: We Can Remember It For You Wholesale

Related Topics

Open Document