ipl-logo

Treatise On Human Nature By David Hume

880 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Hume's argument against religion

He was born in Edinburgh in 1811 into a Scottish Presbyterian family, but rejects it. At 18 he moves to France and writes Treatise on Human Nature (1739), and no one reads it. He returned to England and became a tutor and re-writes the Treatise and calls it An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748), as well as, Essays Moral and Political (1751). Hume was a leading writer and thinker of the Enlightenment in eighteenth century France, who advocated a rational approach to philosophy and government. The thesis of the book is about epistemology, as he is only concerned with things we know. Hume begins by explaining his view on the “moral philosophy, or the science of human nature” (721). He states, “The one considers man chiefly as born …show more content…

He continues to explain his views on the two philosophical approaches and the persons balance of these philosophies as well as their participation in life till they find some hidden ideas that no one has found before. “But may we not hope, that philosophy, if cultivated with care, and encouraged by the attention of the public, may carry its researches still farther, and discover, at least in some degree, the secret springs and principles, by which the human mind is actuated in its operations” (724)? Here Hume seems to be abandoning the sciences of philosophy because there is those who were leading to error in their search for the answers in the universe (725). He does mention one who did seem the happiest when looking for the heavenly bodies (724), but in his conclusion of section one, leads the reader to believe that this type of philosophy, “which seems to have hitherto served only as a shelter to superstition, and a cover to absurdity and error”

Show More
Related
3370 Words | 14 Pages

Hume presents 3 characters, every of whom represent a unique position on this issue, engaged during a dialogue along. Demea argues for the position of non secular Orthodoxy, and

Read More
457 Words | 2 Pages

He was a Scottish philosopher that worked hard in the field of skepticism, more so on his stance of religion. He asked why an ideal God would assemble an imperfect world from scratch. Usually around this century, religion, especially Catholic was never questioned or doubted by anyone. Though, Hume was the bravest soul to step forward and share his suggestion. Finally, a vital character who was extremely crucial to this faction was none other than Voltaire.

Read More
1006 Words | 5 Pages

Introduction: The debate over free will has been one of the most enduring and contentious issues in philosophy. At the heart of this debate lies the tension between determinism, the view that all events, including human actions, are causally decided by prior events and conditions, and free will, the belief that individuals can make choices and act freely. While some philosophers argue that determinism and free will are incompatible, others, such as David Hume, have tried to reconcile these seemingly contradictory positions through a compatible view of free will. In this paper, I will argue in favor of Hume's compatibilist position on free will by exploring its key features and addressing some of the challenges it faces.

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

4, para. 1). In saying this, Hume is trying to make it seem as though he is promoting natural theology, when in fact he is not. In section 1, he addresses a common misconception of the time, that early humans were monotheistic due to their ability to look at the world around them and see everything as a result of one perfect designer. He disputes this and says that 1,700 years ago, all humans were polytheistic, just as the vast majority of people have been throughout history (sec. 6, pg. 6, para 2). Hume argues that polytheism is the natural conclusion that mankind reaches before they are able to “stretch their conception to that perfect Being who bestowed order on the whole frame of nature” (sec. 6, pg. 7, para. 1).

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

In the movie 12 Angry Men it showed many examples of Hume’s ideas such as skepticism, pluralism, relativism, and reasonable doubt. First let me explain what skepticism is, skepticism doubts the validation of knowledge or particular subject. Pluralism is the position that there are many different kinds of belief—but not all just as good as any other. Relativism is when the position that each belief is just as good as any other, since all beliefs are viewpoint dependent. Reasonable doubt is lack of proof that prevents a judge or jury to convict a defendant for the charged crime.

Read More
1439 Words | 6 Pages

In Part II of Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Hume introduces the idea of argument from design through Cleanthes, who states,

Read More
921 Words | 4 Pages

The European Enlightenment Project 2015: David Hume David Hume (1711-1776) was a native of Edinburgh, Scotland, being born there in 1711 to relatively well-to-do parents, and died there in 1776 at the age of sixty-five. In 1721, at the age of ten, he began down a road largely determined by his family when he enrolled in the University of Edinburgh, and left after three years destined to pursue a career of his own. The next decades saw him developing through his publications a brilliant theory of human nature and the extent of human knowledge.

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

At the very beginning of civilization, ancient people had already perceived the limitation of their lives. In order to deal with this painful, unavoidable destiny, which made their lives seem to be not worth-living, they created - and they had to create - mythologies (and others). In other words, they “planted in themselves a blind hope.” In the culture of Ancient Mesopotamia, one can possibly transcend the limit of human lives and achieve immortality through one’s own journey or adventures; on the other hand, in the culture of Ancient India, one as a part of immortal soul is already deathless.

Read More
925 Words | 4 Pages

Hume’s response to this is through is character Philo, Philo said that we should not judge the attributes of god on something like Paley proposes. Philo argues that we cannot judge the entirety of the universe on one single part of nature because nature has an infinite number of springs of principle. Also that we cannot base God on our

Read More
517 Words | 3 Pages

Hume thinks oneself is just a place holder of perceptions, and that one really is nonexistent. Hume defines perceptions as things and information a person is able to provide itself with. He divides these in two catogries such as “ideas or thoughts” and “impressions”. Ideas are the things you think, versus impressions which are things created by your five senses.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

Berkeley realizes that we can have perceptions without there being an external world at all. We have perceptions, but their source is unknown. He also applies this skepticism about the existence of the external world to science, morality and religion. Still, Hume believes that mathematics and the natural sciences are sources of knowledge. Scientific knowledge is not absolute because there are problems with the idea of cause and effect as well as with inductive reasoning.

Read More
1827 Words | 8 Pages

Given what we know or can safely assume to be true of animal brains and behaviors, do animals actually exhibit thought and reason? The answer depends in large measure on one’s definition of thought and reason. Philosophers René Descartes and David Hume hold conflicting views about the nature and possession of thought and reason and, as a result, offer starkly different arguments for and against the existence of thought and reason in animals. While Descartes maintains in Part Five of Discourse on Method that only humans are capable of conscious thought, Hume asserts that human and animal behaviors are not so different in Section Nine of his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

He opines this position by arguing specifically against Aquinas, as mentioned. However, this paper will not focus on arguing that Hume is specifically refuting Aquinas; other critics have argued this idea thoroughly, so I will approach Hume’s opponent as evidently being Aquinas. Hume’s refutation of Aquinas is split into three parts; two of which are solely philosophical, and one that is theological: if suicide is morally impermissible, then it must be a violation of our duty to God, to society, or to ourselves. Hume thinks that suicide does not violate any of these duties, so he concludes that it is morally

Read More
2426 Words | 10 Pages

This essay is guided by one of Hume’s most well-known and influential writings: A Treatise of Human Nature (1738). His most notable deviation from previous philosophies relates to his

Read More
1404 Words | 6 Pages

Hume on the other hand can only confirm what has already happened, being that is the most truthful and logical

Read More

More about Treatise On Human Nature By David Hume

Related Topics

Open Document