• and may be less costly.
10. TRIANGULATION IN RESEARCH.
The use of more than one method to collect data on a topic is triangulation. It enhances more understanding of the investigated phenomenon. It increases one’s knowledge and strengthens the researchers point of view. It’s just synonymous with Not Putting All Your Eggs in One Basket. The resultant effect from triangulation is the fact that the results gotten from the study is not by choice but by a rigorous method, It validates the findings. However qualitative researchers use it ensure that the information of the study is comprehensive and rich in facts and that the information captures the different aspects of the phenomenon under study. Data triangulation involves 3 things- time,
…show more content…
program staff, participants, other researchers and other community members.
PERSONAL LIFE (TRIANGULATION IN RESEARCH):
Triangulation literally means to confirm, certain activities need the confirmation of another person who might be a professional in the field. sometimes I want to get an information that I am not too sure about before I use them. I call a knowledgeable person to ascertain its truthfulness before disseminating. This is triangulation because I want to understand the phenomenon better.
SOCIAL CONTEXT (TRIANGULATION IN RESEARCH):
Socially triangulation occurs when a third person is used as a substitute for direct communication. usually this method is used to express dissatisfaction with the main individual and it happens in dysfunctional families. For instance, a woman married to a husband who suddenly becomes an alcoholic. would discuss with her child on the way further to assist the father to stop drinking, instead of discussing with her husband, she tells the child who discusses tis with the father. The child fills the role of the third person and is being triangulated into that relationship which ordinarily is not his role and too young to understand what is really going on. This should not be, and should be discouraged. As researchers and feminist researchers who work in the field, this should be discouraged and families asked to seek
…show more content…
This is key to my practice as a nurse and I apply it on a daily basis as we intervene in patient care. Sometimes we have patients with pyrexia of unknown origin and all methods are used, continuous monitoring sometimes confirming with another equipment, asking another physician to review, sending blood samples to different investigations and collating in the care of the patient all in a light to validate the diagnosis and treatment. However, I did not look at it in this perspective until I started writing this paper. I would share it with my team and continue to do so. On the other hand, when it comes to research proper I will use these methods and give it a try. I will ask a colleague to use face to face interview to follow up diabetics while I do the phone calls and see if compliance would be