Tupac Research Papers

Tupac Shakur was a rap symbol in the 90's. He was born in 1971 to Afeni and Mutulu who were two individuals from the Black Panther Party. He is from East Harlem, New York and later moved toward the West Coast to pursue his rap career. Tupac was a performing artist, rapper, and a motivation to his fans. Sadly, his life came to an end at 25 years old. Today nobody has been convicted for his murder, and the case is still a mystery.

On September seventh, 1996 at roughly 11:15 pm, Tupac was in a black BMW with Suge Knight, the leader of Death Row Records. Tupac was in the passenger seat, when a white Cadillac pulled up close to his car at a red light and started to open fire on his car. Tupac was shot 5 times and Knight was shot once however the

It was noticed that Shakur got into a fight with Crip part Anderson before the shooting so it gives evidence that Anderson had issues with the rapper. Duane Keith, the uncle of Anderson, had also stated in the documentary that his nephew was the man who shot Tupac that night. The documentary additionally states that the trial will never go to court because of the lack of proof. Being that this was a documentary it was filled with data, yet a lot of it still seems suspicious.

In the documentary Kading discusses how the majority of this data has been withheld for so long, and it was at last time to tell the truth. This influences me to address how genuine these records are. I feel that if the majority of this data was known in advance, some way or another it would've gotten out, and if not why was Kading the only one who knew any of this information. A few questions are also asked when one of the key witnesses took back what he had previously stated about the murder and admits that he might not have been such reliable source after

After this data was discharged, the LAPD asserted that they had no speculates attached to the Shakur case and that they didn't capture or question anybody.

The source additionally discusses how the wrongdoing could have been gang related because Anderson and the driver of the Cadillac from the shooting didn't deny having any affiliations with the Crips. This specific source takes a shot at the proof from a fair minded point of view. It takes a shot at the way that the witness was not giving any dependable evidence, the police office denied having addressed anybody about the case, and how both Anderson and the driver of the Cadillac didn't deny being members of the Crips.

I feel that this source is unbiased since it isn't putting anyone at blame. It is stating how there is a lot of inconsistency with many bits of the story, which is the reason the case is open. The writer has made many different articles about issues where he shows proof, however doesn't enter his thoughts on the matter. He leaves that for the reader to