ipl-logo

Twelve Different Attitudes In 12 Angry Men

571 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Juror 3 character analysis

Twelve different men with all different attitudes in the same room is nothing but bad news. Most of the men just want to say the kid is guilty, so they can go home and the kid can get whatever punishment he has come for him. Only one of the guys wants to see justice for the kid. The author wants to show that there will always be multiple opinions. Everyone will start to get frustrated with each other because everyone has a different mindset. No one really cares what everyone else has to say about the case. The author has shown in this text that it's better to get all the facts out first before coming up with your own opinion. You can easily come up with your own prediction before finding out the facts, but of course before stating your actual opinion about something you must have everything straight before speaking about something you may know nothing about. It's hard to hold in your own opinion because everyone loves for their opinion to be right no matter what someones else has to say about the situation. Especially when you have better things to do rather than listen to a bunch of grumpy men argue about what they think is right. …show more content…

Once he speaks his mind about the case. Someones vote changes to not guilty. Everyone's vote eventually changes, but two men were being stubborn and didn't want to change their vote because they still believed the kid was guilty. They had to reenact what the witnesses said they had seen. Everyone's votes started to change because they were having trouble believe one of the witnesses because she said she saw what had happened, but she wasn't wearing her glasses and her glasses are very thick. People with thick glasses are really blind and how could the witness see what had happened across from her while a train was passing

Show More
Related

Twelve Angry Men: Comparing The Book And Film

726 Words | 3 Pages

Many people, if asked what they would prefer, would prefer to read the book instead of watching the movie. It could be because the movie will always leave some parts from the story out. It seems like directors of the movie always leave out parts from the book, only incorporating the important parts from the story. Some also say that they prefer to leave the descriptions of things in the book up to their imagination. Also, when you are reading the book, you get to read the main characters point of view on things.

Read More

Ethos Pathos In 12 Angry Men

997 Words | 4 Pages

He then decides to recreate what the old man said he did on the night on the murder. Juror #2 seems really interested in this argument and even volunteers to help with the time. In the beginning of Act 2, the jury decides to vote once more. At the time, Juror #2’s vote was “not

Read More

Andrew Carthew: A Case Study

56 Words | 1 Pages

Andrew Carthew, a 59-year-old paramedic in Britain, woke up one day in June 2015 with a "weepy eye," the Bristol Post reports. Six weeks later, he lost sight in the eye; less than a year after that, he lost the eye completely. Now he 's warning others about a little-known yet very serious danger of contact lenses.

Read More

Character Analysis Of Juror 8 In 'The Monsters Are Due On Maple Street'

652 Words | 3 Pages

and they start to gang up and say “he sat in there for 6 days and he doesn't know” and “You sat right in court and heard the same things I did” (Rose 14). This evidence shows that just because he has his own opinion and doesn’t want to vote guilty because everyone else did, people aren’t respecting his opinion and are basically calling him stupid for his decision. And I feel like more people started to choose innocent because they took into consideration of his idea and realized they could stand up to the rest of the group since they had

Read More

Ethos, Pathos, Pathos And Logos In 12 Angry Men

1964 Words | 8 Pages

What is worth our attention in this movie is how in the beginning they are trying to convince each other to vote guilty. 11 juror voted guilty and only one voted not guilty. Their judgments were based upon either their past personal experience which created their thoughts and behavior or upon facts. Juror 8 represents the conscience. He stood up for his inner feelings that the accused young boy is innocent.

Read More

Analysis Of Stereotypes In 12 Angry Men

747 Words | 3 Pages

People tend to base characteristics of people pretty quickly; likewise, their personalities. Most people base their opinions on stereotypes. Reginald Rose and his play “12 Angry Men” demonstrate how people are quick to judge other people based on looks. In the movie all twelve jurors must decide if a young boy is guilty or innocent. At the beginning of the movie/play-write, only one juror, juror eight, decides the boy is innocent.

Read More

Peer Pressure In Reginald Rose's 12 Angry Men

1247 Words | 5 Pages

While all of the other men have changed their vote to a not guilty verdict, the third jurors remains with his original belief. Even in the very end of the play, he acts hostile against the others trying to change his mind, in saying “Do you think I’m an idiot or something?” (Rose 72). One juror that seems almost impervious to argumentative fallacies and peer pressure is Juror 8. Juror almost displays the ideal juror, and the rest tend to mimic the flaws of the system.

Read More

Character Differences In 12 Angry Men

1133 Words | 5 Pages

Although 3 does change his mind in the end, he is the last to change so he is the leader for the guilty side. In the end, the reader can look at figure 1. and take away the fact that juror 8 is the main character, and that jurors 3 and 8 causes the main conflict in the

Read More

Minority Influence In 12 Angry Men

1458 Words | 6 Pages

This movie is the best example of minority influence where in the earlier stage only one juror no. 8 says defendant is not guilty but in the end of the movie we see that he is able to influence all the jurors in a very logical manner which I am going to point out later so that all the jurors lastly says the defendant is not guilty. Minority influence is more likely to occur if the point of view of the minority is consistent, flexible, and appealing to the majority. The juror no. 8 doesn’t know defendant is guilty or not guilty but he has only doubt in his mind which he trying to clear during the entire film and with which he also able to clear the views of other

Read More

12 Angry Men Interview Analysis

1139 Words | 5 Pages

8: I think that… as a juror… we have to really think, we have to think about all the evidence, about all the outcomes. Well if I voted guilty at the initial vote, we would’ve let the boy die but as a juror being given jury duty… one of the highest duties of citizenship… is a big duty and being trusted and chosen to have a person’s life in your hands is just way too much pressure to handle and is one of the hardest things to do in your own lifetime and a one of a lifetime experience that you will just never forget. I would say that a case like this takes so much time and needs to have a proper moral to end up with the right

Read More

12 Angry Men Research Paper

473 Words | 2 Pages

They are trying to find out if a boy has supposedly killed his father is true or not. Some of the men just want to go based off of what they are hearing and are not trying to find out more about the case. Some of the men vote to try to see if the boy is guilty or not but the votes are half and half, so what they try to do is look at the boys background, the father's background, and the people who told them had seen it all's backgrounds. They try to look at every detail to find out if the boy is guilty or not and they are trying to not go based of of what the people who supposedly seen it because they are trying to look at it from different perspectives.

Read More

Reasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men

1011 Words | 5 Pages

Reasonable doubt proves that critical thinking is important when someone’s life is in someone else’s hands. “Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose, is a play about twelve jury members who must deliberate and decide the fate of a man who is accused of murdering his father. These twelve men must unanimously agree on whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty without reasonable doubt. Just like the jurors, the readers of this play have not witnessed the crime that took place before the trial started. Everyone, but the writer, is in the dark about who committed the crime.

Read More

Social Psychology In The Movie Twelve Angry Men

721 Words | 3 Pages

The movie “Twelve Angry Men” illustrates lots of social psychology theories. This stretched and attractive film, characterize a group of jurors who have to decide the innocence or guiltiness of an accused murder. They are simply deliberating the destiny of a Puerto Rican teenaged boy accused of murdering his father. Initially, as the film begins, except the juror Davis (Henry Fonda), all other jurors vote guilty. Progressively, the jurors begin trying to compromise on a point that everybody agree because the decision of the jury has to be unanimous.

Read More

Psychological Behavior Analysis In 12 Angry Men

1232 Words | 5 Pages

12 Angry Men:-Psychological Behaviour Analysis Signs Of attributions There were many examples of attribution errors and biases in the movie. For example (an actor observer bias) the kid (Victim) is known to have yelled "I'm going to kill you" on the night of the murder. Cobb says no one would threaten to kill anyone unless he mean it (internal attribution)(0:46:25)&(0:46:45) .But after some time Fonda involves cobb into some argument and indirectly makes him yell "I'll kill you".

Read More

12 Angry Men Case Study

858 Words | 4 Pages

In a New York City, an 18-year-old male from a slum is on a trial claiming that he is responsible for his father death by stabbing him After both sides has finished their closing argument in the trial, the judge asks the jury to decide whether the boy is guilty or not The judge informs the jury decided the boy is guilty, he will face a death sentence as a result of this trial The jurors went into the private room to discuss about this case. At the first vote, all jurors vote guilty apart from Juror 8 (Henry Fonda), he was the only one who voted “Note Guilty” Juror 8 told other jurors that they should discuss about this case before they put a boy into a death sentence

Read More

More about Twelve Different Attitudes In 12 Angry Men

Related Topics

Open Document