This novel falls into a category that unfortunately cannot be described as a feel good novel, meaning that the story presented does show very dark themes. Despite the detail and message of this book many people tend to be uncomfortable with William Golding’s lack of a faith in humanity. This idea he presents in The Lord of the Flies can easily coincide with Jack, one of the main ‘antagonists’ of the story. Jack can be compared to a cruel tyrant or as an evil factor in Golding’s story. He is one of the characters, like Roger, meant to show that their is at least a little bit of evil in everybody, some people more than others. Jack represents the corruption a thirst for power can easily influence on a person, the island turns him into a confident, jealous, violent, and manipulative tyrant. Of course Jack doesn’t necessarily start off as a the monstrous image the book paints him in. In fact, in the …show more content…
He sees himself as Ralph’s equal and is angered when Piggy a boy that, in Jack’s point of view, is useless. For example, there are many instances where he shows his distaste for Piggy and jealousy in his situation. “[to Piggy] Who cares what you believe- Fatty!” (81), “[to Piggy] You shut up, you fat slug!”(82), and showing his jealousy, “[to Ralph] That’s right- favor Piggy as you always do-”(82). He clearly believes that Ralph has a bias for Piggy, and in a way he does, but only because Piggy isn’t as strong as the other boys. Because of this obvious display of favoritism, to Jack, he becomes a recalcitrant factor of the group quickly attempting to turn his choir group, or his ‘hunters’, and the other boys against Ralph and in companionship Piggy. He, of course, fails to get the ‘biggins’ to publicly betray Ralph and defect to Jack’s more primitive lifestyle. But some of the boys join him in secret and decide that he is the ‘proper’