Tyranny Research Paper

Mid-term Essay Tyranny

The word tyranny can have several different meanings. Thomas Jefferson meant to use the term in its essential meaning – adding “absolute” to reinforce the meaning: oppressive power exerted by the government. In today some people may think the word means all people are equal, but according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary the word tyranny can be defined as, “cruel and unfair treatment by people with power over others. It can also be defined as: “a government in which all power belongs to one person: the rule of authority of a tyrant.” Tyranny processes absolute power through power through the people in a state or in an organization. Tyranny can be seen from different perspectives, but it can also has the same meaning

Once in the preamble, and once in the grievances. To support his assertion of tyranny by the kind, Jefferson listed the grievances against the King in an accusation form- giving over the surplus portion of the Declaration of Independence to this objective. The main point of the Declaration of Independence is to succeed from Great Britain. In addition to that the preamble is the purpose of the Declaration of Independence, and Jefferson clearly stated, “The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries of usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states.” The first notice says that the king is aspiring to institute tyrant over the U.S. meaning that his rule was whimsical and irrational, not democratic, and not by the people. This tyranny in general, in the abstract by rule by and autocrat, not the people. The second time is in the grievances, and that’s their reasons for separation against Great Britain, and it states that, “He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation of tyranny, already begun with circumstances or cruelty and perfidy paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of civilized nation.” The second mention is more particular and detailed. The king has

The history of the present king of Great Britain is a history of imitated abuse and annexation, all having indirect object the establishment of an absolute tyrant over these states. He also has prohibited his governors to pass law of immediate and pressing importance, unless postponed in their operation till his agreement should be obtained; and when so postponed, he has absolutely dilapidated to attend to them. In every stage of this oppression, we have appeal for counteract in the most humble terms; our repeated appeal have been answered only by imitated abuse. “The public opinion at the time did blame the King who held ‘The pretended title FATHER OF HIS PEOPLE,’ and to one town declaration.”(Schneewind, Sarah page 7) A prince whose individuality is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant is incapable to be the ruler of free people. King George III has refused for a long time, after such disintegration, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, inadequate of abolition, have returned to the people at large for their exercise, the state remaining in the meantime unprotected to all the dangers of invasion from without and contractions within. He has done many great injustices’ that have caused him to be a great tyrant such as Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin. Putting this