People travel around the world to site see and try different food from different cultures. As the world is being explore, people argue about which country is better to live. That really depend on the type of lifestyle a person need or want. Home is where the heart is depending on what makes them comfortable. Some might want to live in a third world country with no bills to pay. In another hand, some might want the luxury of having technology. When it comes to it, there are pros and cons to living in both places. That led this literature to comparing and contrasting about living in United State verse living in Laos. One similarity of living in the U.S. and Laos are everybody has to work to survive. Although, it’s not the same kind of work, a person must perform some kind of duty to put food on the table. An example of working in the U.S. are these nine-to-five jobs, a person will go in for eight hours a day and five days a week. Theirs these labor law that protects working citizens from over working in America, so forty hour is the limit. On the other hand, in Laos, a person has to work in the field under the sun, they will have to put in more than twelve hours a day and seven …show more content…
verse Laos are traveling from point A to point B. The example in the U.S. is a person must travel by transportation of any form. That’s either by cars or buses. America has become an industrial world with technology that nothing is close enough as down the street anymore. If a person wants to work, they must find transportation to get to their destination or they will never get there in time. In Laos, everything is within miles of destination. With that, people can just walk and it doesn’t require them to drive. Not unless if they want to reach the next village. Than the few percent that owns a car can help with a lift. Although Laos is a third world country with no technology, getting to the rice field by walking is a good exercise for the