ipl-logo

Under Armour Organizational Structure

1711 Words7 Pages

CONTENTS
Planning
Planning is the basic management function that includes looking ahead and outlining the future courses of action. It is a preparatory step that decides when, how and who is going to carry out a specific job. Planning involves the preparation of one or more detailed plans to attain the optimum balance of needs or demands with the available resources in an organization. Top managers will decide the specific goals and objectives such as mission and vision that they want the organization to achieve. The mission statement of Under Armour is to “Make all athletes better through passion, design, and the relentless pursuit of innovation”. The company’s mission is driven by the founder of Under Armour, Kevin Plank. Plank plans …show more content…

Fulks
• President of North America, Jason LaRose
• Chief Digital Officer, Michael Lee
• Chief Revenue Officer, Karl-Heinz (Charlie) Maurath
• SVP, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, John Stanton The organizational structure of Under Armour is functional structure. The members of the organization are grouped according to the particular function to perform within the organization. Functional structure facilitates specialization, cohesive work groups and improves operational efficiency. Below is the functional structure chart of Under Armour:

Leading Leading is the social sources of influence that employers use to inspire the action taken by employees. A company that has a good leadership knows how to motivate, interact, improve employees’ morale during a recession and resolve conflicts among their employees. Mr. Krongard was appointed by the board as Under Armour’s lead independent director to further strengthen their corporate governance structure and provide independent oversight of the organization. As the lead director of Under Armour, he acts as a liaison who develop information sources between the non-management directors of the Board and the Chairman, CEO and President, Kevin Plank and other members of management team, chairs regular executive sessions of the Board without Mr. Plank present and performs other functions as requested by the non-management …show more content…

Plank avoids making unilateral decisions in his organization, he allow his employees to make decisions for him. According to an example from Inc Article, when Under Armour started acquiring makers of activity and diet tracking apps two years ago, some of the company’s oldest employees were skeptical. Therefore, Plank spent hours holding one-on-one conversations with them in order to persuade those staffers that the acquisitions were a good idea. He mentioned that it was important that it wasn’t his decision. Under Armour has less than 25 employees, therefore Mr. Plank is able to bring the entire team together at least once a week to talk about major decisions among the issues of the organization. According to Inc. in 2009, he mentioned that he motivates his team members by allowing them to voice out because he knows they are more motivated when they feel needed, appreciated and valued. In conclusion, Under Armour practices leading in their management function by appointing Mr. Krongard as the lead director to strengthen their governance structure, Mr. Plank allows his employees to make decisions and motivates them by making them feel appreciated. Leading is a process that cannot be looked down on when doing anything. Leading is necessary to organizing a group of people to achieve organizational

Show More
Related
207 Words | 1 Pages

The leadership behaviors at CVS reflects the aforementioned leadership philosophy. In an interview with leaders at CVS headed by Merlo motivates their employees to accomplish more than what is usually expected of them. According to Northouse (2013), the transformational leader plays a vital role in initiating change, where followers and leaders are inextricably bound together in the transformation process (Northouse, 2013). In the case of CVS, this is clearly evident by what Scott Baker, CVS Senior Vice President has to say : “nobody works in solos, we collaborate on concepts and ideas with the goal of providing our customers with best-in-class service and high quality merchandise” (CVS, 2015). CVS’ encouragement of open communication

Read More
620 Words | 3 Pages

When it comes to athletic apparel, the first company people think of is either Nike or Adidas. Why is this so? Both Nike and Adidas have done an impressive job in marketing their products, with popular spokesperson like Kobe Bryant or Derrick Rose. Nike’s success is attributed to its products contributing to the success of the athletes who purchase them. Nike and Adidas seemed as though they had control on the athletic apparel oligopoly, but recently, Under Armour has become a serious competitor to the two companies.

Read More
1188 Words | 5 Pages

1. Introduction Under Armour, Inc. (Under Armour) is a leading sports apparel and equipment manufacturing company founded in 1996 by Kevin Plank, a 23-year-old former University of Maryland football player.. He revolutionized the sports apparel industry by creating a superior, moisture-wicking, performance T-shirt, made of synthetic fabrics. Under his leadership, the company grew from a 17,000-dollar business in 1996 to a 4.83-billion-dollar empire. 2.

Read More
1158 Words | 5 Pages

2.0 Competitor Analysis The industry that Under Armour is involved with is extremely competitive, with competing against big names such as Nike or Adidas. Although it’s hard at the beginning, but customers want to have the highest quality apparel therefore they turn to Under Armour. Under Armour stays in the competition by having high quality products, and also by signing endorsements deals with major athletes (Owusu, 2017). By having major athletes represent Under Armour, means the company will be bringing in "big money" because they will bring up the brand’s popularity. The major competitors in this industry are of course inclusive of big names such as Adidas, Nike, Dick’s Sporting Goods and Puma.

Read More
3388 Words | 14 Pages

Before entering an unknown product horizon, the company will investigate its viability in the product category as well as measure its competitive advantage to other companies in the niche. Under Armour’s unique ability to measure these two important factors has allowed it to create a product base which consumers have high loyalty towards. The Under Armour brand has positioned itself in the high quality, high price, and best available in the market, category. It advertises itself as delivering higher customer value and is therefore capable of charging higher prices for their goods.

Read More
1271 Words | 6 Pages

Executive Summary: Under Armour is a company which was launched by former University of Maryland football player Kevin Plank. When he first started his business, it was named KP Sports, it is now known as Under Armour. The company started very small and operations were held from the basement of the founder's grandmother's house. However, the company soon expanded to have a remarkable market share in the sports apparel industry.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

Goals Nike focuses on pursuing opportunities and improving their product to enhance the human potential. Thereby they create product, services and experiences for athletes helping them overcome limitations such as climate and road types. Core Competency and Sustainable Competitive Advantage Nike’s have maxims to help Nike employees to create better products and provide better services for the customers. Henceforth creating better customer value compared to companies.

Read More
3092 Words | 13 Pages

Under Armour: Working to Stay on Top of Its Game Lulu M. Mero Webster University Abstract This paper explores the case study found in the Strategic Management: Competitiveness & Globalization (10th ed) under the authors of the book, Michael A. Hitt, R. Duane Ireland, and Robert E. Hoskisson. The title of the case is “Under Armour: Working to stay on Top of Its Game” which analyzes fully the portfolio of the company. Under Armour is an apparel firm that faces some competition and it constantly has to revise its business strategy to stay on top of the market. This case study discloses the company’s history, growth, product and sales profile, major competitors, management, marketing, business strategy, and strategic challenges.

Read More
3600 Words | 15 Pages

It can thus be seen as “a process by which managers discover where they are, where they want to go, how they believe they might get there, if they are getting there, and, as they proceed, if they still want to get there”. To do this efficiently and effectively, planning must take into account both the company’s complexity and its relevant environment. It does so in many ways, which include forming different levels of planning. Effectiveness of anticipation: The starting point for strategic planning is anticipating an action.

Read More
2493 Words | 10 Pages

It acts as an operating manual that defines the way the jobs are distributed and how individuals interact within the company to achieve their goals (Distelzweig, 2004). A detailed study on organizational structure relates organizational structure to the way information flows through the hierarchical arrangement. There are basically two types of organizational structure; centralized and decentralized. In a centralized system the highest layer of hierarchy is responsible for decision making and controlling departments and division.

Read More
1276 Words | 6 Pages

The top management is the final authority and it manages policies and aims for an initiative. It basically focuses on coordinating and planning functions. Led by Chairman Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, the Board has 14 members to handle different parts of the business round-the-globe, supported by Chairman’s and Corporate Governance Committee, Nomination and Compensation Committee, Audit Committee, and Finance Committee.  Middle Level of Management: The branch managers and departmental managers constitute the middle level.

Read More
920 Words | 4 Pages

This functional Organization structure is a circular one and centric one with CEO in the middle. (Figure – C) Figure C – Functional Organizational structure of Apple Inc. (2011) Each and every function of the company caters around the Chief executive officer, Tim Cook. There are Various Advantages of this kind of Organizational structure that are as follows: 1.

Read More
765 Words | 4 Pages

("Ortega 's Leadership Style") Apart from the CEO and different departments at the headquarters, regional managers were empowered to manage the store in their respective areas. Employees like store managers were empowered by having sovereignty and independence. This is to make

Read More
1486 Words | 6 Pages

It is the planning before the action. In includes many activities like making decisions, making strategy for organization etc. At this time strategic planning is an important part of strategic management. Strategy describes how the goal achieves by using the available resources or what kind of resources they need to achieve the goals. This strategy is used when the organization wants to set the goals and wants to make the planning to achieve these goals by available resources.

Read More
1304 Words | 6 Pages

‘Organizations provide its managers with legitimate authority to lead, but there is no assurance that they will be able to lead effectively’ (Lunenburg, 2011). Organizational success usually requires a combination of both management and leadership. In today’s dynamic work environment, leaders are expected to challenge the present state of affairs, and to motivate and convince organization members. Managers are needed to assist in creating and maintaining a positive and well-functioning workplace. ‘Leadership and management are often considered practically overlapping concepts’ (Bohoris and Vorria, 2007, p. 1).

Read More

More about Under Armour Organizational Structure

Related Topics

Open Document