The financial institution (drawee) paying the check, or on which the check is drawn, is responsible for seeing that the money is paid to the proper person if the payee is named. As proof that the money has been paid, the drawer expects to find the payee’s endorsement on the paid and canceled check. “Endorsement” can be defined as the legal transfer of one’s rights to the check to another party. A check represents money, so an endorsement transfers ownership of that money from the payee to another person or entity.
Journal In this task In this task we will get into two teams and look into examples of job adverts, job descriptions and job applications and we will compare their best features and then create our own job advert, description and application and we will then give it to the other group and interview them to see if they will meet the criteria that we came up with for our job. We have come up with the idea to create a job advert for a retail assistant in Marks&Spencers My team consists of Ismail Esse - Ismail was in charge of creating the job application.
This is an excerpt from an appellate brief for an appellate advocacy course at Loyola Law School. This sample includes legal analysis from the first section of this brief. The brief was written on behalf of the Providence Securities, Inc., Mary Shaw Latimer, Stewart Small, and Roland Graf, who appealed the judgment entered after a bench trial confirming the arbitration award for Loretta and John Smythe. The Smythes maintained securities accounts with Providence until they were tricked by a Ponzi scheme and lost $950,000. Mary Shaw and Roland Graf handled the Smythe’s accounts at Providence until Ms. Shaw left the company for a different securities company, Martins Lydel.
It does not matter the amount being deposited every dime should always be deposited into the individuals account it belongs to them and not to Jane. Jane committed a statuary offense of embezzlement. Jane took the money from the deposits with the intent to use that money for her
However, the Court failed to give appropriate weight to this
William Hill PLC William Hill PLC is one of the UK’s largest and most respected land-based bookmaker which has 2,360 licensed shops around the UK. Today William Hill PLC is respected for providing responsible betting and gambling services through licensed shops as well as in online across many different countries. In 2002, the company was listed and trading on London Stock Exchange. › What are the objectives of the company?
However, it must be determined whether Das’s promise to come until Monday constitutes sufficient consideration. Since, no deposit was made that is there was not sufficient consideration. Das would have to prove that he gave some sort of consideration to Ali to keep the offer open and if Das has taken a bank loan, the court may consider it as a valid consideration. Otherwise, the agreement does not stand according to the law. Therefore, Das cannot have any legal action against
According to your bank’s deposit account agreement both of you have been designated as the only authorized signors on the account. I think it’s safe to say that since Jane forged your signatures on several checks, those checks were not properly authorized. From what I understand all the checks were payable to Don with the exception one which was payable to “cash” and given to the church. The UCC views the check payable to “cash” as a bearer instrument.
Everyone was told to maintain silence, stand up and following that everyone was told to sit down. Then the Plaintiff’s Lawyer Mr REYNOLDS stood up, introduced himself and his party and was given the chance to speak. Following that he started to describe the case to the judges and explaining and providing references from previous cases and also mentions what Polish Club Limited breached. After that the defendant’s lawyer that is MR CLAY was allowed to speak for the defendant who argued for a while and defended Polish Club Limited. The Honour and the other judges questioned Mr Reynolds, the plaintiff’s lawyer, about evidence and reference provided to make sure whether the claim they are making against Polish Club Limited comply and whether Polish Club Limited breached the law.
The Process for this case, the female employees of Walmart is suing Walmart for discrimination for denying females promotion. The process this case had to go through is, the 1 female employees filed a petition. The record is then transferred to the Supreme Court. After the court examining the petition for review and supporting materials, the court decides whether to grant or deny review. In this case the Supreme Court denied the petition stating “the women fail to show Walmat has a policy of discrimination that work to harm all female employees” Majority opinion is the official verdict in the case that represents the vote of the majority of justices, while the Concurring opinion is an opinion that agrees with the decision but may disagree
The forfeiture by wrongdoing exception does not apply to Mr. Davis because there is no evidence he intended to make Ms. Davis unavailable. The United States Supreme Court has recognized that forfeiture by wrongdoing acts as an equitable defense to a Confrontational Clause challenge. Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 832–34 (2006). But the exception only applies if the defendant “intended to prevent a witness from testifying.” Giles v. California, 554 U.S. 353, 361–62 (2008).
The courts decision seems reasonable as both the defendant and plaintiff had breached a duty of
Police carry out their duties under a system that is constantly changing and comprising of social, economic, legal, intellectual, and political determinants that combine to form a unique environment. A combination of these factors determines the behavior of police in how they enforce the law, when they should enforce it, and which law to enforce. Although the police body distinguishes itself from other social institutions, its mode of operation is influenced largely by forces outside the police organization. As a result, the police are said to be premised on the social contract theory as stipulated by philosophers Jean-Jacques Rousseau because it incorporates the interdependence between the government, the state, and the society (Gaines & Kappeler, 2015).
As I pursue my future career, I strongly intend to practice corporate law as my established occupation. In order to become a prosperous corporate lawyer, I recognize the crucial, essential requirements, including an explicit skillset and a vital education. Therefore, I strive to vividly comprehend the field of corporate law as well as explore my pursuit in becoming a successful corporate attorney. My inspiration and desire for engaging in corporate law derives within my entrenched interests in examination, communication, as well as the institution of a business. I value the synergy, self-sufficiency, and attentiveness involved in businesses, and I also enjoy the discussion and analysis encompassing law in general.
I believe in order for you to be a good leader you must learn and understand how to be a good communicator. How you communicate to your workforce, peers, and stakeholders are all very different. You will not use the same approach with everyone, but you may try to send the same message and in that case you would need to use different skills. This is no different when you’re dealing with conflicts, or dealing with people who are not agreeing with your point of view. This can cause us to take on different types of egos.
