The definition and concept of universalizability is argumentative and is a form of an honest decision that invites us to imagine a world in which any planned action is accepted by everyone else. Universalizability tells us that we shouldn’t make promises we don’t intend to keep. From the Stack Exchange, it states that it,” was set out by the 18th-century by German philosopher Immanuel Kant as part of his work Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. It is part of the first design of his unconditional importance, which states that the only ethically acceptable sayings of our actions are those that could realistically be desired to be universal law. The principle of universalizability is a type of an ethical examination that invites people to imagine a world in which any planned activity is useful by everyone else. For example, if we are drawn to drink, then we must reason what the world would be like if everyone drank. If we considered donating to SPCA, what would it be like if everyone donated to the SPCA. The principle is by indicating whether it is morally acceptable or not by universalizing some actions …show more content…
Example # 2: Another example in a similar level, if a person decided to start charity, the world would be a different place if everyone else carried out the same decision of charity. Utilitarianism is an ethical attitude in which the happiness of the greatest part of people in the society that could be considered the greatest good. An accomplishment is honestly right if its consequences lead to happiness, and wrong if it ends in unhappiness. Utilitarianism is also a theory in ethics holding the proper course of action is the one that maximizes utility, usually defined as maximizing happiness and reducing suffering. Utilitarian ethics emphasizes the consequences of our acts. From the utilitarian perspective, there is