ipl-logo

Unraveling The Mystery: And Then There Were None By Agatha Christie

1077 Words5 Pages

Unraveling The Mystery By reading “And Then There Were None” by Agatha Christie, I noticed how the author used subtle clues to point out the killer in the novel. This story started off with a description of a a mysterious island called Indian Island. The main characters traveled to the island by ferry per an invitation from a Mr. or Mrs. U.N. Owen. The main characters, Vera Claybourne, Emily Brent, Philip Lombard, General Macarthur, Dr. Armstrong, Mr. Blore, Anthony Marston, and Justice Wargrave all thought they were heading on an exciting getaway. When they arrived on the island, the house servants, Mr. and Mrs. Rodgers, were there to escort them to their rooms. They come to find out that nobody there had actually met the owner, U.N. Owen. …show more content…

As the guests acquainted themselves with each other, a voice boomed over a loudspeaker. The unknown voice charged each guest with the murder of another person. The guests then figured out that U.N. Owen stood for unknown, and Justice Wargrave declares that there may be a lunatic that lured them all to the island. Each person feels the need to explain the circumstances behind their acquisition of murder. In most of the cases, there is a reasonable explanation. They were never tried for their part in the killing, and justice couldn’t touch them. Shortly after that, Marston takes a sip of his drink and keels over dead. People assume it to be suicide, but one of the ten little indian figures is missing from the table. When more suspicious deaths happen, the guests become paranoid and on edge. They start to turn on each other and question motives, belongings, and whereabouts. After every death, an Indian figurine disappears. The guests have their own theory on who is the killer, and Wargrave declares that nobody, except the dead, are out of the equation. After everyone is dead, the reader finds out that Justice Wargrave masterminded the killings. He had a strong desire for justice …show more content…

As one of the last people alive on the island, the others realized Wargrave had gone missing. Wargrave was then found by Dr. Armstrong with an apparent gunshot wound through the forehead. “It (a wig) fell to the floor, revealing the high bald forehead with, in the very middle, a round stained mark from which something had trickled” (Christie 151). This stained mark can be paralleled to the “mark of Cain” in the Bible. Cain was the first murderer and was marked after killing his brother Able. This incident is described in the Bible with this quote, “And the Lord said unto him, Therefore, whoever kills Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the Lord set a mark on Cain, lest anyone finding him should kill him” ( King James Bible, Genesis 4.15). In the text, we can assume that the wound is to be interpreted as a mark because the killer in the book is playing God. He is taking justice into his own hand because the guests on the island are sinners that cannot be held legally responsible for their transgressions. This specific instance can serve as a clue that Justice Wargrave is a

Show More
Related
1378 Words | 6 Pages

They spend Christmas here. While reading the paper, Perry notices an article on a recent murder, one coincidentally alike the one they committed. Though, they did not commit it, they think it’s some lunatic who had heard of the Clutter

Read More
366 Words | 2 Pages

14. The initial speculation has a few suspects but the suspects are cleared. The people of Holcomb confront what is actually happening. 15. Holcomb was not perfect before and people would hide what the truth was.

Read More
1666 Words | 7 Pages

Progressing through the novel, the length of hypothesis’ given lengthens to account for an increased amount of background that the reader has accumulated, taking more factors into consideration. The active knowledge of the narrator’s game is proposed as “although this plethora of information may seem valuable, it will lead the reader only further into his own Lake of the Woods, a place where facts are useless and conjecture supplies only open-ended answers” (Radelich 572). Suggests that the more that is believed to be known, the more the reader is thrown into a spiral of information that is not particularly useful in the determination of guilt of John Wade. In the whirlwind of information where information flows as the narrator allows and possible explanations are forged, the ability of the narrator to sway the audience is optimized. Observed most clearly in the evidence sections, the narrator speaks directly to the audience about the evidence and what is to be made of it.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

In the court of law, everyone is guilty until proven innocent. Thus, Hobart Ison was guilty when killing Hugh O’ Connor. Though by law Hobart was a murderer, many question that very decision. Though a killer, locals of urban Kentucky would argue that his actions are justifiable. Elizabeth Barret creates Stranger with a Camera as a tool to look into those justifications and see the reasons Ison murdered O’Connor.

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

Georgiana took note of Aylmer’s displeasure of the birthmark from the dream and through his stealthy stare, causing Georgina displeasure (Nathaniel Hawthorne 114). Aylmer’s further loathing of the birthmark, causes Georgiana to give up for the sake of his happiness. She tells, Aylmer after bringing up the conversation of the birthmark, “Either remove this dreadful hand, or take my wretched life!” (Nathaniel Hawthorne 114). Aylmer could have avoided tragedy, however he failed to listen to his assistant Aminadab, who stated he would “never part with that birthmark” (Nathaniel Hawthorne 114).

Read More
1470 Words | 6 Pages

Mortality is written all over Georgiana’s birthmark, if taken away it would resemble nothing else than death itself. According to Hawthorne, “Aylmer now remembered his dream. He had fancied himself, with his servant Aminidab, attempting an operation for the removal of the birth-mark. But the deeper went the knife, the deeper sand the Hand, until at length its tiny grasp appeared to have caught hold of Georgiana’s heart; whence,

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

The first and most important use of symbolism we receive is that of the birthmark. We learn that, “in the centre of Georgians's left cheek, there was a singular mark, deeply interwoven, as it were, with the texture and substance of her face” (205). Upon further reading Hawthorne tells us that, “Its shape bore not a little similarity to the human hand” (205). Georgiana had a birthmark right in the middle of her left cheek that resembled a tiny hand in which Aylmer thought was very imperfect. The birthmark symbolizes mortality or an imperfection of

Read More
408 Words | 2 Pages

The hand serves as the image of mankind. Aylmer sees his wife’s birthmark as “the symbol of his wife’s liability to sin, sorrow, decay, and death” (2). The way he views the mark on her cheek serves as a reminder that death is inevitable for both him and Georgiana. It contrasts Aylmer’s idea of achieving perfection through science and it disturbs him. When Aylmer dreams of removing Georgiana’s birthmark, he sees that the hand’s “tiny grasp appeared to have caught hold of Georgiana’s heart; whence, however her husband was inexorably resolved to cut or wrench it away,” (3).

Read More
619 Words | 3 Pages

The author does this to give us the impression that the birthmark is no ordinary birthmark, but that it has some sort of mystical tie to Georgiana. Another example is how the story talks of how Georgiana was like a celestial being after Aylmer had relieved her of her only flaw but he regretted removing it for it also ridded

Read More
1213 Words | 5 Pages

In And Then There Were None, Agatha Christie chronicles the deaths of the ten main characters. Slowly, one by one, each character is killed off by an unknown. At first, the deaths were suspected as suicides, but as the coincidences build up, the thought about murder provoked the remaining characters’ minds. 10… 9… 8… 7… 6… 5… 4… 3… 2… 1… everyone is killed. That isn’t the question though.

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

The demonstration of the narrator's imagination unconsciously leads his own thoughts to grow into a chaotic mess that ultimately ends in a death. By murdering, it’s his own way of finding peace. He is portrayed as being a sadist, sick man with an unnatural obsession for

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

After they realize that the assailant is one of them, and not someone hiding on the island, (on page 165) the first character introduced, Justice Lawrence Wargrave, said that “I reiterate my positive belief that of the seven persons assembled in this room one is a dangerous and probably insane criminal… From now on, it is our task to suspect each and every one amongst us.” While they do this, they believe that the murderer is one of the others (which is true), but their guesses are usually incorrect. For example, on page 169-170, Philip Lombard and Vera Claythorne discuss who they think the killer is and both of them are wrong. Philip suspects Judge Lawrence Wargrave and Vera suspects Doctor Armstrong, who Lombard soon begins to distrust as well. The use of irony adds to the suspense because it shows that the characters cannot escape their fate by reasoning out who the killer is, as they are always

Read More
1487 Words | 6 Pages

Towards the end of the book, a quote shows that the man who actually kills the people on the island is choosing to kill them to serve justice whether they are

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

A crime that reaches Sherlock Holmes is not just a broken law, but a mystery. Trivia locates patterns to form functional solutions, while Doyle creates a world of disguises, drugs, and intrigue, in which the answer is never the obvious or expected. The facts presented are not the definite, or even likely, conclusion. This is apparent in the story’s mystery, in which the wife of Neville St. Clair witnessed what appeared to be her husband’s murder, leading to the arrest of a beggar, Hugh Boone, who was found at the scene of the crime. However, Sherlock Holmes deduces that Boone and St. Clair are the same man, revealing that St. Clair had been commuting to the city to beg rather than work and had allowed his own arrest to protect his ruse.

Read More
1730 Words | 7 Pages

All characters are accused and redeemed of guilt but the murderer is still elusive. Much to the shock of the readers of detective fiction of that time, it turns out that the murderer is the Watson figure, and the narrator, the one person on whose first-person account the reader 's’ entire access to all events depends -- Dr. Sheppard. In a novel that reiterates the significance of confession to unearth the truth, Christie throws the veracity of all confessions contained therein in danger by depicting how easily the readers can be taken in by

Read More

More about Unraveling The Mystery: And Then There Were None By Agatha Christie

Related Topics

Open Document