ipl-logo

Us Relation Essay

1289 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Discuss the importance of interdependence

The current US-Japan relations are considered strong and had been improved by the late 1990s. Japan is one of the most successful democratic countries and has the largest economies in the world. In fact, there are so many reasons why the US is keeping and eager to maintain this partnership with Japan. In addition, those reasons, definitely, can be interpreted using multiple theories and examined from different perspectives. But, it is crucial to describe some facts concerning the current relationship in detail before evaluating the nature of the relation using theories of international relations.
Currently, the US-Japan relation is described as a strong alliance relation. This is due to several facts and situation. For example, one of the …show more content…

The liberal or interdependence theory is a very interesting theory to use when examining the nature of the US-Japan relation. The theory argues that the cooperation between the US and Japan is historically inevitable and this cooperation is a result of a harmony of interests, resulting in mutual benefits for both states. This aspect of the theory is applicable to the current relation and can be seen in Japan becoming less problematic to the US as China displaced Japan as the greatest perceived economic threat to the U.S. Also, the alliance is based on shared vital interests and values, including the political stability in the Pacific region, the promotion of the economic and political freedoms of both states, and support for human rights, and democratic institutions in both countries. In addition, the liberal theory argues that the non-state cooperation between both states, represented in their bilateral membership in international organization, play a crucial role in maintaining the strong connection. This applicable to the US-Japan relation as Japan and the US belong to a number of the same international organizations; “In January 2016, Japan began its two year role as a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council. Also in 2016 Japan assumed the presidency of the G7 and hosted ten ministerial meetings during the year as well as the May 2016 G7 Leaders’ Summit” (Japan). Another assumption of this theory is that the powerful economic connection and trade between the United States and Japan reduce conflict. This can be clearly seen in the Us economic policy towards Japan that strives for magnifying access to Japan’s markets; at the same time “Japan represents a major market for many U.S. goods and services, including agricultural products, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, films and music, [etc.]”.

Show More
Related
651 Words | 3 Pages

This paper focuses on the failure of diplomatic decisions made by Japan that is national in nature most particularly when they chose to fight in the midst of an embargo made by the American government. The attack of Japan against Pearl Harbor is a result of an erratic, egoistic and irrational behavior blinding the Japanese Military Personnel and Officials of the destructive outcome of the World War 2 and a lack of diplomatic strategies that misled the communication between USA and

Read More
430 Words | 2 Pages

In 1939 the US put an embargo on the trade of aircraft and aircraft parts being exported to Japan(Doc C). The US put this embargo on Japan a little after the Japanese had declared their “new order” policy. By establishing the embargo the US was getting involved in the war efforts against Japan. This meant that they were getting in the way of Japan's effort to create a purely Japanese empire in East Asia. With this embargo, Japan realized that they had made a new enemy.

Read More
704 Words | 3 Pages

Overall Japan had new world order that they were going to enforce one the Americans did not fit

Read More
327 Words | 2 Pages

There are many nations that are continuously changing. Japan is one of the nation that is continually changing not only economy, but also the culture. According to the book, “the Western world was increasingly impinging upon Japan..” which result isolation from Europe and American. In the document 19.1 it stated, “We have issued instructions on how to deal with foreign ships on numerous occasions up to the present”. This have shown that the Japanese have isolated from foreign.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

The United States and Japan fought in World War II during 1941 to 1945. Japan planned to expand their land and gain resources- which led them to invade China whom was an ally of the U.S. In result, the United States cut off the supply of oil to Japan. On December 7th 1941, Japan’s air force did a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor because that is where their military base is located.

Read More
1665 Words | 7 Pages

This, as a result, affected Japan’s regional relations and marred the inherent distrust both the

Read More
966 Words | 4 Pages

The U.S has worked Japan down to its last straw, pretty soon Japanese leaders are going to lose it and turn on the United States. Stated in Document C, In May 1940, President Roosevelt moves the U.S Pacific fleet from California, to Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Furthermore, in the following July, the Congress passes the Naval Expansion Act promising, to triple the size of the fleet by 1944 (Doc C). Japan, Already fearful that the Americans have more power over them, are aware of the expansion, in response Japanese leaders remark, “... When I think about the strengthening of the American defenses in the Southwest Pacific, the expansion of the American fleet, … I see no end to the difficulties... “

Read More
1382 Words | 6 Pages

In a letter from the U.S. Ambassador in Japan to the Secretary of State, the U.S Ambassador mentions notably the poor internal economic and financial situation of Japan along with the unsuccessful attempts to obtain loans from England, France, and Holland. The Ambassador also mentions the steady increase of stress in the Government and the mention of a hot-headed military that doesn't want to face the horrible facts (Doc H). Due to the fact that the U.S. Ambassador is in Japan his point of view on Japan’s situation is first hand and can see the effects of the deprivement of resources Japan is going through. In past history many countries had taken an imperialist mindset and when in the need for resources they would take over other countries for their resources. So keeping in mind the United States power, Japan’s want for the same power, and Japan’s “hotheaded military”, Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor could have been to take resources from the U.S. as well as weaken them for possibly taking their power.

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

Japan's expansionist policies significantly contributed to escalating tensions with the United States, culminating in the attack on Pearl Harbor. In the years leading

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

This comment was made in a meeting of Japan’s top government and military leaders, “When I think about the strengthening of American defenses in the Southwest Pacific, the expansion of the American fleet, … I see no end to difficulties … I fear that we would become a third class nation after two or three years if we just sat tight” (Doc E). Japan felt that if America grew stronger, it would destroy their plan to establish a new order in the world. They were afraid that the strengthening and expansion of the American fleet would result in them having even less power and respect than they started

Read More
1704 Words | 7 Pages

They could easily put Japan in a crisis, as they did, but America acted as though they did nothing aggressive to provoke the Japanese to attack them. In this paper, There

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

American government meanwhile will express its sincerity to the Japanese government by making sure that they do not interfere with the conflicts going on between Germany and Britain. Therefore American government will cut out all assistance to the Britain and offer a hand of trust to the Japanese government The American government is also willing to compromise and lift sanctions which were imposed on Japanese government. This is in line with showing good faith to the Japanese government. However the American government will be doing this with

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

According to Hideki Tojo. Imperial Conference November 5, 1941” it states, “Two years from now we will have no petroleum for military use. When I think about the strengthening of American defenses in the Southwest Pacific of the expansion of the american fleet…”. This piece of evidence shows that the U.S government is getting stronger. This is shows that This will strengthen the US economy because it will take away resources that japan relied on the US

Read More
2266 Words | 10 Pages

At the turn of the century, America and Japan were in good spirits with each other. In President William McKinely’s Annual Message to Congress, he reported “Japan's declarations in favor of the integrity of the Chinese Empire and the conservation of open world trade therewith have been frank and positive” and “under the treaties(American purchase of Puerto Rico, Cuba, and Guam) which took effect July 17, 1899, has proceeded without international friction, showing the competence of the Japanese to hold a foremost place among modern peoples'' showing the happy relationship between the two countries and setting the standard for what America strived for the relationship to be like in the following years(William 1900). However, the multiple accounts of the rising tensions followed by Diplomacy slowly broke the relationship down. The Gentlemen’s Agreement starting in 1905 was the first time conflict between the countries has risen. This was the start of the Anti-Japanese policy in America and despite setting it with the agreement at the time, the policy rooted itself within the country slowly splintering the American Japanese bond.

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

The first movie which was entitled “Guns, Germs, and Steel” talks about how one land had so much advantage over the other. This already caught my attention and it got me thinking to the different possible answers to the statement. Why was indeed one land able to develop complex societies and civilizations over the others? Maybe it’s because people in those developing areas, like in the United States, were vastly educated, hence they were able to gain knowledge on how to manage things like plant and animal domestication for a much more stable food access and production. Food is the most basic need of humans, therefore once food is stable there is prosperity and development.

Read More

More about Us Relation Essay

Related Topics

Open Document