ipl-logo

Us V Bailey 44 US 394 Case Analysis

1184 Words5 Pages

U.S. v. Bailey, 44 U.S. 394 (1980)
Facts of the Case: On the morning of August 26, 1976 Clifford Bailey and three other prisoners (James T. Cogdell, Ronald C. Cooley, and Ralph Walker) were at the District of Columbia Jail, where they removed a bar from the window and proceeded to use bedsheets that were knotted together in order to escape for one month to three and a half months out of custody (“United States v. Bailey Et Al”, 1980). This led to the violation of statute 18 U. S. C. § 751, which is about escaping the federal jurisdiction of custody from them. The escapees did not immediately turn themselves in, but did say that they did not do so because they were told, indirectly by who they claimed was the FBI, that they would be killed …show more content…

Every court case has a ruling, but not all who know of each ruling, agrees with each ruling. For some cases, there are dissenting opinions in the case from a justice. I disagree with the Court’s decision on U.S. v. Bailey, 44 U.S. 394 (1980). This is because of how they handled the case, since there was more to it than just escaping confinement, according to the defendants. Also, the court does not clearly tell the jury what exactly they are determining about the case. This is not something that helped the jury conclude. With this in mind, it is necessary to review all aspects of the case.
On a morning in August, Bailey, Cogdell, Cooley, and Walker removed a bar and then escaped by using sheets that were tied and knotted together. To escape means to break free or get out of a restraint or confinement. The definition of escape from custody, legally, is as follows “leaving the custody of the Attorney General, or confinement in an institution” after being convicted and processed under the United States laws (“Escape from Custody”, 2018). By this definition, the defendants did escape from jail. However, there is another element to this specific case. The other element being that the defendants have stated that they illegally left confinement was to escape from the violent beatings of the prison guards and the other inmates. Also, August, Bailey, Cogdell, Cooley, and Walker repeatedly told the court that there were terrible

Show More
Related
1328 Words | 6 Pages

However, as noted in the majority opinion, the arrest itself was not the cause of the case.

Read More
97 Words | 1 Pages

when Sue Sylvester learned that Mr. shuester had killed Titan she was very upset at losing her companion Ms. Sylvester has come to our office to ask if she can sue Mr. Schuester over the death of her beloved Titan I am considering filing a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Please review the attached case, Ammon v. Welty, 113 S.W.3d 185 (Ky. App. 2002), assume it states the current law on the topic, and write an analysis of whether Mr. Schuester’s conduct meets the “intent” element of a claim for intentional infliction of emotional

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

Vonlee Titlow was tried for murder when she and her aunt Billie Rodgers killed Billie's wealthy husband Donald Rodgers. The prosecution Presented Titlow with a plea bargain of manslaughter, for her testimony against her aunt Billie in her trial. Shortly before the Trial of Titlow's aunt Billie, she had a conversation with an officer, who instructed her not to take the plea if she was, in fact, innocent. After this conversation, Titlow got rid of her current lawyer for new counsel in her case. Toca who was brought in as this new counsel fought to get the length of the plea reduced to a lower term.

Read More
213 Words | 1 Pages

The last case Defendant cites, Quinones, is almost identical to Pierce and Barrett in that the facts also involve a capias warrant issued by a trial court in an active Ohio case, when appellee failed to appear for his trial. In Quinones, defendant-appellee had gotten arrested and incarcerated in Arizona while awaiting trial on his Ohio matter. In that case also, the prisoner did everything possible to notify the appropriate prison authorities, court and prosecutor of his place of imprisonment, and promptly filed a pro se motion for speedy trial to give actual notice to the State and Court. Here too, the State failed to act in a timely manner after the detainer was set to return the prisoner to Ohio custody, and he filed a motion to dismiss

Read More
630 Words | 3 Pages

Both inmates eat in their cells. The guards are not armed and carry no means of self defense. On October of 1983 in the morning, Silverstein was being escorted from the shower to his cell and stopped at Randy Gometz's cell. Two of the three guards were at a distance from Silverstein. Silverstein reached into Gometz's cell and the third officer heard a click from the handcuffs.

Read More
1454 Words | 6 Pages

Business Law Case Study Essay: Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, 573 U.S (2014) Facts: The Green family runs and owns Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., a national arts and skills chain that has over 500 stores and they have over 13,000 employees. Other facts of the case are that the Green family has been able to organize the business around the values of the Christian faith and has explicitly expressed the desire to run the company as told by Biblical principles, one of which is the belief that the utilization of contraception is wicked. Also, the facts show that under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), occupation -founded group health care plans must offer certain sorts of preventative care, for example, FDA-accepted contraceptive approaches.

Read More
428 Words | 2 Pages

A Washington police officer stopped a student at the Washington State University after observing the student was carrying a bottle of gin. After asking the student for identification the student informed him that is was in his dorm room. The student, followed by the officer, then went into his room get his identification. While the student was searching for his identification, the officer noticed that the student 's roommate, had marijuana seeds and a pipe on his desk. The officer asked the students if they had additional drugs in the room and the students provided him with a box with marijuana and money.

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

Hank and his crew were jailed, but later released due to a biased judge, a lack of evidence, and the denial of counsel. This factor had clearly provided fuel for the

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

Overview of Clements v. State The case of Clements v. State is an example of how the legal framework of stalking laws in Texas should be interpreted and the effectiveness of this law to ensure justice for the victims. The case depicts how the law should operate despite certain vagueness in aspects of the First Amendment. The decision of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas to uphold the conviction while disagreeing with some conclusions arrived at by the trial court proves that stalkers will not be allowed to slide through cracks in the legal system. The case, based on a sequence of events where the complainant, Jennifer Clements, was subject to psychological trauma accompanied by an imminent physical threat to her from Nathan Clement, her estranged husband, is a forthright condition of stalking which complies with the Statues of

Read More
1557 Words | 7 Pages

Dred Scott vs. Sanford case was the biggest mistake in U.S history, hands down. It is listed as the first case of the top ten worst Supreme Court decisions. Dred scotts case was the most significant because after his, no other case had ruined the reputation of the court quite as bad. This case was a huge deal, and is still an important subject to teach to students today. This case was said to be the case that started the civil war, although that may be an exaggeration.

Read More
1665 Words | 7 Pages

In 1945, the High Court of Australia heard the case of Gratwick v Johnson and ultimately decided to dismiss the appeal in a unanimous decision by the Judges. While different reasoning was employed, all five judges drew the conclusion that the appeal should be dismissed as the statute the defendant was charged under was inconsistent with s.92 of the Australian Constitution. To provide some context for this case in 1944, Dulcie Johnson was charged with an offence against the National Security Act 1939-1943 in that she did contravene par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order by travelling from South Australia to Western Australia by rail. In brief terms par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order provided that no person shall, without a valid permit, travel from state to state or territory.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

When the person is bailed out of the jail, he will be able to remain free until their trial date. If the person commits a crime while he out on bail, he may be arrested and sent back to jail. Bail Bond You have

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

Ewell v. Robinson, The Rape Case that Rocked the Nation By: Hailey Ellwanger After hours of jury deliberation, the case of Ewell v. Robinson has reached its conclusion. The jury finding the defendant Tom Robinson guilty of raping Mayella Ewell. This case is a prime example of the injustice that can occur when juries listen to their prejudices instead of the evidence. The two different sides of the story vastly differ, the jury ruling in favor of the Ewell’s.

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

They had all planned out the escape and did all the construction but then on the night that they all tried to escape the three inmates put down all the face bodies and so did the fourth one (Allen West). But when Allen West tried to kick down the vent in between the two cells the vent would not budge. So the others went on without him. But when Allen finally got the vent open the others were gone. So Allen went back to his cell and told the police what happened.

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

What happened: Well in this event there were two main parts, the first part being the Tasha’s father’s lawyer suggesting Tasha to go to court for her father 's bail hearing. So basically what happened Tasha went to go see Tasha’s father 's lawyer and he suggested to Tasha that she go to court but she was confused because it was going to be a school day. Then the lawyer explained that if Tasha went to court it would show the judge that Leonard’s family cared about him and believed in him enough to go to court and support him and possibly let him out on bail.

Read More

More about Us V Bailey 44 US 394 Case Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document