ipl-logo

Utilitarian Principles Of Ethics: The Ford Pinto Case

903 Words4 Pages

English philosopher and founder of Utilitarianism, Jeremy Bentham described the fundamental axiom as the greatest happiness of the greatest number determining the measurement of right and wrong (Burns 46). Utilitarianism can be simply described as producing the greatest happiness or pleasure of the most while at the same time generating the most harm and unhappiness to the least. The utilitarian principles of ethics apply to businesses as well since they are a functioning aspect of society. In utilizing utilitarian principles of ethics, businesses must take caution not to put more emphasis on the happiness of the most (i.e. financial well being) at the cost of less focus on harm (i.e. negative health effects). It is possible, under utilitarianism, …show more content…

This question is evident in considering the Ford Pinto Case. In an attempt to compete with smaller Japanese imports, Ford Motor Company introduced the Pinto in 1971 in record time for design and production for a new car line. Due to this “accelerated production schedule, the Pinto was not tested for rear-end impact until after it was produced” (DeGeorge 310). After production, the car failed the rear-end impact test due to the design placing the fuel fuel tank in a position in which, if struck from behind at a speed of greater than 20 miles per hour, it would be punctured by a bolt from the bumper. Ford realized through a study that a baffle, costing between $6.65 and $11, could be placed between the bumper and the fuel tank making the Pinto less susceptible to …show more content…

The issue with Ford’s use of utilitarianism in an attempt to justify the Pinto mistake is that, a) it is wrong to calculate the value of human life in this concept, b) it is wrong to equate the cost for society with the company’s projected losses, and c) it was wrong for Ford to assume the whole of the cost would be absorbed by the projected dead and injured when in fact, the cost of this mistake would be shared by consumers (to include their family), local community, environment, government, Ford employees, Ford Shareholders, Ford management, and even Ford suppliers. Ford could be advocating that since the Pinto offered what was considered adequate transportation at a good price, the danger of fiery rear-impact collisions was justifiable and therefore achieved the greatest good for the greatest number. So, is it that all automobile companies should produce adequate transportation at a good price regardless of safety? Of course not. If all companies subscribed to this belief, the number of consumers would rapidly decrease, hence decreasing the opportunity for the profits being sought to begin with. The problem with his argument is that the theory focuses on the outcome of the action rather than the process, assuming that “the end justifies the means,” and

Show More
Related
1115 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout the nineteen seventies, automobile safety regulations and rising oil prices would have an effect on the Camaro. In 1973, the Camaro’s front bumper was then forced to be revised to fulfill new standards put in place by

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

Bentham founded utilitarianism and developed the principle of adding pleasures and subtracting sufferings to promote a happy nation. However, one of the critics is that it only makes most people happy but leave a minority by itself. According to Eric Weiner, happiness is also a business of the government. Fifteen years

Read More
768 Words | 4 Pages

California Democrats major aim is to reduce the consumption of tobacco as it is a demerit good which is bring huge impacts on the economy and consumers. Thats why they would like to increase tax on more then 50%, from 87 cents per pack to 2.87$. As well as banning the use of the electronic cigarettes in public places, such as restaurants and parks, where tobacco smoking is already prohibited and chewing tobacco too. They also would like to increase the legal smoking age from 18 to 21. The tobacco tax is an indirect tax which increasing cost on pack of cigarettes. The market of cigarettes is an example for market failure, its when a market fails to produce efficient outcomes, and in particular does not achieve allocative efficiency.

Read More
1800 Words | 8 Pages

Claims have been made that suggest Ford’s decisions in the Pinto brought about a lot of positive benefits to society at large such as providing a car almost anyone could afford and stimulating the domestic economy amidst a time of massive quantities of competitive foreign imports. People who make this argument are appealing to the ethical principle of beneficence which states companies have an ethical moral obligation to affect society in a positive way [3]. Even if the long-term effect of the Pinto offered some benefits, Ford still violated the principle of beneficence. The principle of beneficence also states that companies have an ethical obligation to take away existing harm similar to the principle of non-maleficence. As we know Ford made no efforts to take away the existing harms in their products which they were well aware of.

Read More
1533 Words | 7 Pages

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that focuses on outcomes and consequences. When one considers the theory of utilitarianism, it must be understood that the pleasure is a fundamental moral good and the aim is to maximize pleasure and minimize pain. So, when a human is going through the decision making process it is of the utmost importance to look forward at the consequences of the decision and determine if the decision will maximize pleasure and minimize pain. John Stuart Mill, a nineteenth century philosopher focused on the theory of utilitarianism or the Greatest Happiness Principle and claimed that the maximization of happiness for the greatest quantity of people is the ultimate goal. One issue that we face in modern day America that

Read More
1772 Words | 8 Pages

Utilitarianism can seen as “Ends often justify the means”. In the essay, A Critique of Utilitarianism, Bernard William says, “One value to a particular discomfort to utilitarianism is justice... but I shall be more concerned with something rather different from integrity”(279). Williams disagrees with utilitarianism because it sometimes requires us to do something that we know is wrong (279). He gives an example of a man does not accept a job offer because he believes it is wrong.

Read More
1522 Words | 7 Pages

The first and fundamental canon in the NSPE code as stated is to hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public. Firestone had clearly violated this code since the company was well aware of the glaring issues with their tires but chose not to act upon them. Firestone’s actions in this controversy showed their lack of concern for the safety of its consumers which should hold the utmost importance to engineers. According to utilitarianism, Firestone acted immorally in this case by not following the principle of utility. It is apparent that the company violated the principle of utility as they caused many suffering and endangered the well-being of the public by causing many injuries and deaths.

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

Upon reading the case study titled “Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Ford Pinto,” and reviewing Bentham’s Hedonic Calculus, along with the essentials of the Utilitarian school of thought, it is quite clear that Ford Motor Company’s decision to greenlit the production of the Ford Pinto model without fixing the vehicle’s defective part was indeed morally permissible. The first set of reasoning which led me to this conclusion can be found directly in Bentham’s Hedonic Calculus. Within this, Bentham establishes the seven criteria one must consider when making a decision based on resulting pain or pleasure, whether it be for an individual or a large group of people. What is key to focus on, in this instance, is the criteria of the fecundity of the act (the chance the result has of being followed by sensations of the same kind), and the intensity of the resultant pleasure.

Read More
1565 Words | 7 Pages

Bernard Williams’ essay, A Critique of Utilitarianism, launches a rather scathing criticism of J. J. C. Smart’s, An Outline of a System of Utilitarian ethics. Even though Williams claims his essay is not a direct response to Smart’s paper, the manner in which he constantly refers to Smart’s work indicates that Smart’s version of Utilitarianism, referred to as act-Utilitarianism, is the main focus of Williams’ critique. Smart illustrates the distinction between act-Utilitarianism and rule-Utilitarianism early on in his work. He says that act-Utilitarianism is the idea that the rightness of an action depends on the total goodness of an action’s consequences.

Read More
1622 Words | 7 Pages

Should Ford produce an unsafe automobile or redesign and risk another year out of the sub-compact market? For Ford, the choice was simple, use the original design to gain access into the sub-compact marketplace. However, the basis

Read More
1218 Words | 5 Pages

The main principle of utilitarianism is happiness. People who follow this theory strive to fulfill the “ultimate good”. The “ultimate good” is defined as ultimate pleasure with out any pain. It is said that the pleasure can be of any quantity and any quality, but pleasures that are weighted more important are put at a higher level than others that are below it. This ethical theory also states that if society would fully embrace utilitarianism then people would naturally realize their moral standing in the

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

Utilitarianism believes that the rightness or wrongness of an action is completely based on just the consequences of the action. Utilitarianism can be defined at its core as the belief that choices should be made for the greatest benefit for the greatest number of people. A real life example of utilitarianism can be seen in the story of the wreck of the Mignonette. In 1884, a crew of four men were stranded at sea over 700 miles away from the nearest land when the ship they were

Read More
1685 Words | 7 Pages

From a utilitarian perspective, the ‘greater good’ may be believed to be the greatest amount of profit, potentially leading to a ruthless attempt to maximise income. This could come in the form of using cheap labour to be able to create maximum profit for the shareholders – and, furthermore, could end up blatantly disregarding human rights. This is a major issue of utilitarianism – basing ethical decisions on goodness for the greatest number of people allows for a

Read More
1492 Words | 6 Pages

[6] Ford knew about the questionable design for the Pinto but still went ahead with the product and put public safety aside. Ford had analyzed that they could have saved lives by using a new design stated in this text: “the new design would result in 180 less deaths” [6] Ford decided that “the cost would have been $137 million versus the $49.5 million price tag put on the deaths, injuries, and car damages, and thus Ford felt justified not implementing the design change. “ [6] Ford in this case of the Pinto design did not follow the code of ethics and due to this it led to the deaths of other people. These are the implications that could happen if an engineer does not put the public safety and welfare first, which is why engineers are obligated to follow rules and keep public

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

His advocacy of individual and economic freedom had augured well the path for individualism to be imbibed by the individuals in the society. Hence, his theory of individualism is called economic individualism. He is of the view that “it is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong” (Bentham 3). And this very principle as enunciated by Bentham constitutes the basic essence of his philosophy of utilitarianism. However, this very principle of utilitarianism also faces criticism in later time for the fact that it cannot adequately safeguard the rights of every individual person and that happiness depends on many other things other than based on this principle.

Read More

More about Utilitarian Principles Of Ethics: The Ford Pinto Case

Related Topics

Open Document