ipl-logo

Violent Or Nonviolent Protest In The 1960's

649 Words3 Pages

We live in a volatile time and still face many issues with civil rights. We have school shootings, police shootings, and even a church shooting earlier this year. As time goes by, and as civil rights seems to progress, we are still reminded that racism, hatred, and civil unrest are unfortunately still alive in our society. Looking back at the civil rights movements of the 1950’s and 1960’s, and even today, the question is often asked whether violent or non-violent protest are more effective. However, it may be argued that it is not which is most effective, but rather that it is the combination of both that has created the ultimate awareness and could be the recipe for success. For example, Martin Luther King was known for nonviolent protest, and Malcom X was known for violent protest, but much of the success of the civil rights movement of the 1960’s was based on the result of both types of protests as the media moved public opinion by reporting on the violent reactions to the protests. …show more content…

Those events helped shape the changes in civil rights such as voting, equality, and de-segregation. Many of the leaders of the Civil Rights movement chose non-violent methods of protest to change the awareness of inequality, discrimination, and ultimately. Martin Luther King was the most influential leader known for advocating nonviolent methods of protest, which made him one of the most productive and respective leaders of the movement. Martin Luther King’s nonviolent protest was a radically different view from other leaders during The civil rights movement in the late 50s early 60s such as Malcolm X, who believed that racial inequality and injustice must be overcome with equal violence and retaliation. The essence of King's beliefs can be summed up in the following excerpt from his now famous 1963 "I Have A Dream

Show More
Related
1038 Words | 5 Pages

During the 1960s and 1970s, there was significant protesting from workers and civil rights organizations to create better working conditions; despite peacefully protesting, innocent demonstrators were attacked on several occasions such as during the Selma to Montgomery marches, leading protesters to question the power of nonviolence. In “Nonviolent Resistance”–– an article published on the tenth anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr’s assassination–– Cesar Chavez, a strong advocate for civil rights, contrasts the effectiveness of nonviolence compared to violence, creates a strong link chain to demonstrate the flaws in violent action, and shifts the tone of the speech in order to promote nonviolent protest as means of making a difference, ultimately

Read More
811 Words | 4 Pages

Violent protest can "...go to the point of murdering the hater, but it doesn't murder hate. " The result of the Nonviolent protests under king both saved the hater and lessened thee hate." ... in purely practical as well as moral terms, the American Negro has no alternative to non-violence." (Doc L) This was true, and the non-violent approach was much more well accepted by the white majority at the time.

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

Aiden Schroeder Mrs. DesLauriers AP Language & Composition 11 January 2023 Resisting Violence: Non-violent Protest Perseveres Throughout Martin Luther King Jr.’s life, he advocated for nonviolent resistance to oppression and racism in America. The solution to the long lasting problem was found in his words and his strength of mind, rather than violence and physical strength. Today, the strategy of nonviolence keeps proving its effect.

Read More
651 Words | 3 Pages

Cesar Chavez, labor union organizer and civil rights leader, took the 10th anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. as an opportunity to remind people about the benefits of nonviolent resistance. Chavez published an article in the magazine of a religious organization devoted to helping those in need. In this article, Chavez shares his views on how nonviolent resistance is more effective than violent resistance. Chavez contracts the outcomes of violence versus nonviolence using an if then format in order to prove nonviolence superior.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

As Oscar Wilde said, “ It is through disobedience that progress has been made-- disobedience and rebellion.” Disobedience during the American Revolution was originally peaceful, but as grievances grew and British rule became harsher, Americans could no longer sit idly by. Radical disobedience to the law was necessary in order to promote change for American society. During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960’s, a drastic nonviolent movement was necessary to counteract the expectation of violence, reiterating to Americans that peaceful resistance to laws can positively affect a free society. The Civil Rights movement was split by two factions: one was a violent resistance named The Black Panthers and the other was a nonviolent protest led by Martin Luther King Jr.

Read More
970 Words | 4 Pages

For example, When Michael Brown was killed there was a several marches around the country they all got national attention. In Martin Luther King’s speech he argues that people should stick to using non-violence instead of using violence to solving your problems: “So in the days ahead let us not sink into the quicksands of violence; rather let us stand on the high ground of love and non-injury.” The idea that we should use non-violence instead of using violence is better because if you start to use violence people are going to say they want change but they are harming our city 's, we cannot advocate violence because we want change to happen and we don 't want more people getting hurt. Indeed we should use non-violence because we will get national attention. Ultimately non-violence protests are better than violent protests because if we want to change something from happening we have to be civilized americans and not make things

Read More
1974 Words | 8 Pages

However, the action should be taken without nonviolence and with peaceful protest. Dr. King’s nonviolent tactic was a success as it bridged the gap between the colored and white people. Malcolm X was renown for his act of self defense throughout the Civil Rights Movement. His main goal was to prove how whites did not treat black people as human beings. However, through Malcolm X’s several tactics, Martin Luther King’s movement was made more impactful and successful.

Read More
525 Words | 3 Pages

Malcolm X grew up in a much lesser community. His neighborhood was violent and there wasn’t much schooling. Martin Luther King Jr. was always against violence, throughout his entire lifetime and believed using nonviolent forms of protest. King would even condone being nonviolent when he was hurt physically. Malcolm X used whatever form of protest he needed to get the job done and

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr., the leader of nonviolent Civil Rights movements, once proclaimed, “...non-violent resistance does not seek to defeat or humiliate the opponent, but to win his friendship and understanding... The aftermath of non-violence is the creation of the beloved community, while the aftermath of violence is tragic bitterness” ( MLK Jr. Doc 11). The Civil Rights Movement began as a nonviolent movement in order to integrate white and black Americans to create an equal nation.

Read More
1053 Words | 5 Pages

These non-violent sit-ins were extremely important in the civil rights movement showing the care, and dedication, these rightful citizens had in the fight for equality. However, a lot of the short-term success of these non-violent protests came from the rage and lashing out against African Americans from white supremacists and those who opposed the

Read More
1275 Words | 6 Pages

Inspiring future generations, his legacy will be defined by his unwavering dedication to nonviolent activism and the pursuit of equality. Prominent civil rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. promoted nonviolence as a strategy for bringing about social change. His key claims were that real development can only be made peacefully and that using violence only serves to reproduce

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

was one of the most influential leaders in the Civil Rights Movement, and his nonviolent activism played a big role in bringing about change. He led massive protests, including the famous March on Washington, which gained widespread attention and support from the public. Martin Luther King Jr.’s nonviolent leadership helped to shift the focus of the Civil Rights Movement toward peaceful, nonviolent means of protest. Unlike other activists of his time, such as Malcolm X, who advocated for change through any means necessary, including violence, Martin Luther King Jr. remained committed to nonviolence and his dedication helped bring genuine change in discrimination and establish equal

Read More
299 Words | 2 Pages

Non-Violence was common in the Civil Rights movement especially when different groups came together to work so that the message could get out without having the backlash of fighting back. In Selma there were multiple marches and attempted protests that happened on the Edmund Pettus Bridge. Non-violence on the side of the police was not very common especially during the first march on Bloody Sunday. However the brutality on the police's part had drawn supporters out from every religion, race, age, and gender who would move to participate in the next march. The next march which was ill fated when first brought up because the president had warned Dr. King that there will be the same violence that had happened in the previous march, this march

Read More
1119 Words | 5 Pages

and Malcolm X. These leaders searched for ways to address the complete inequalities that kept African Americans belittles and enslaved. Martin Luther King, Jr. believed in nonviolent protests and marches as a way of achieving equality. He argued that change could be brought about through peaceful ways, such as boycotts, sit ins, and marches. Malcolm X, on the other hand, believed in a more violent approach to achieve equality. He argued that African Americans should be willing to defend themselves against violence and

Read More
1678 Words | 7 Pages

Many cultures have shown the same fears throughout history, and often they have had the same reactions to these fears, especially the fear of death. Myth is a common structure of ancient and modern cultures. Mythology surrounding death, and what happens after death, has long been a way for many cultures to try to make sense of the unknown and to confront their fear of it. However, in ancient societies, myths about death had a more immediate and visible effect on the people and their daily activities.

Read More

More about Violent Or Nonviolent Protest In The 1960's

Related Topics

Open Document