ipl-logo

Wake Forest Law Case Summary

280 Words2 Pages

Generally LARRY E. RIBSTEIN & ROBERT R. KEATINGE, RIBSTEIN AND KEATINGE ON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES § 1:2 (2d ed. 2011).

David L. Cohen, Theories of the Corporation and the Limited Liability Company: How Should Courts and Legislatures Articulate Rules for Fencing the Veil, Fiduciary Responsibility and Securities Regulation for the Limited Liability Company?, 51 OKLA. L. REV. 427, 429 (1998) (discussing the significance of the LLC in Delaware).

WILLIAM MEADE FLETCHER, FLETCHER CYCLOPEDIA OF THE LAW OF CORPORATIONS § 18 (2012).

Rugani D. TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY EQUITY: TAILORING THE CORPORATE VEIL PIERCING DOCTRINE TO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES IN NORTH CAROLINA. Wake Forest Law Review [serial on the Internet]. (2012, Fall2012), [cited August 7, 2015]; 47(4): 899-920. Available from: Business Source Complete. …show more content…

Piercing the Corporate Veil of an Alien Parent for Jurisdictional Purposes: A Proposal for a Standard that Comports with Due Process. California Law Review [serial on the Internet]. (2008, June), [cited August 7, 2015]; 96(3): 731-763. Available from: Business Source Complete.

David Aronofsky, Piercing the Transnational Corporate Veil: Trends, Developments, and the Needfor Widespread Adoption of Enterprise Analysis, 10 N.C.J. INT 'L L. & COM. REG. 27, 57 (1985).

John D. Gleissner, David C. Veeneman, & S. Rodgers Wheaton, Obtaining Personal Jurisdiction Over Alien Corporations—A Survey of U.S. Practice, 9 VAND. J. TRANSNAT 'L L. 345, 346-47 (1976).

Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 475-76 (1985); World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 297-98 (1980).

Mathews v, Diaz, 426 U,S, 67, 77-78 (1976); Wells Fargo & Co, v. Wells Fargo Express Co, 556 F, 2d 406, 416 n,7 (9th Cir, 1977); Velandra v. Regie Nationale Des Usines Renault, 336 F, 2d 292, 294 n,7 (6th Cir,

Show More
Related
525 Words | 3 Pages

Key Facts: (Who are the parties? What are they fighting about? Who is suing whom for what?) Susan Kirkpatrick, Appellant; John Zitz and Transamerica Insurance Company, Appelles; Kirkpatrick originally filed a complaint in trial court for a skunk bite she received while in a pet store owned by John Zitz.

Read More
184 Words | 1 Pages

Name of Case: LaChance vs. Erickson Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court Parties and their roles:. LaChance, director, Office of Personnel Management petitioner; Erickson et al Responded Relevant facts: Federal employees made false statements to agency investigators with respect to their misbehavior. The legal issue(s) raised: The legal issue raised was that the respondents, federal employees were charged by their agencies because each of them made false statements to the agency investigators with respect to their misconduct.

Read More
331 Words | 2 Pages

The court cases Goldberg and Wheeler do not stand for the proposition that only welfare benefits for people in extreme circumstances are entitled to pre-termination hearings. However, this is one situation where cutting off benefits with little or no notice could affect the well-being of the family or person. Any programs that offer they type of assistance people rely on to survive could benefit from pre-termination hearings, not just the welfare program. Welfare is one of the main public assistance programs, although I think housing assistance and food stamps might fall into the welfare category, they are also in need of a pre-termination hearing. In the Goldberg and Wheeler cases, California and New York did not want to give anyone a hearing

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

Issue Case name: State of Oregon vs Kenneth James Harris, October 19th, 2017 Facts of the case: In the case there were two parties, one party including the defendant, Kenneth James Harris, and the State of Oregon. The dispute is based on the state of Oregon issuing a subpoena for the witness to come to trial for the case of the defendant, however, the witness failed to do so and was unavailable. The defendant argued that the only way the witness is unavailable is if the state did everything in their power to try to get the witness to court. The only thing the state did was provide the victims recording of the 9-1-1 call from the incident. Issue: Could the State of Oregon done more to produce the witness at trial?

Read More
213 Words | 1 Pages

The Dred Scott vs. Sanford Supreme Court case has gone down in history as one of the most notorious cases and recognized as driving the country closer to civil war. The case became controversial in 1833, because Dr. John Emerson, purchased Dred Scott, and moved to the Wisconsin Territory. From the Missouri Compromise, slavery was banned in the Wisconsin Territory, therefore, making Scott a free man, right? After living there for a number of years Emerson moved to St. Louis and died in 1843 leaving Eliza Irene Sanford, Emerson’s wife, the owner of Scott and his family. When Scott asked for freedom, Stanford declined which lead to Scott suing the state court, where he won and was acknowledged as a free man.

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

Mathews v. Eldridge is a case held by the United States Supreme Court that discussed about individuals have a statutorily granted property right in Social Security benefits, and the termination of such benefits implicates due process but does not require a pre-termination hearing. The case is significant in the development of American administrative law. Mr. Eldridge, who was the plaintiff in this case, has begun receiving Social Security benefits since June 1968. However, those benefits of Mr. Eldridge were terminated without a hearing. In March 1972, the state agency in charge of monitoring Eldridge’s medical condition sent him a questionnaire.

Read More
488 Words | 2 Pages

" The term limited liability corporation" is not a legal term of art. The AICPA's Board apparently uses the term to refer to regular commercial corporations, as distinct from professional corporations ("PCs"), which are already permitted under the existing version of Rule 505.

Read More
831 Words | 4 Pages

State of Florida v. Brenton Leonard Butler is a case where the State of Florida accused Brenton Leonard Butler, a 15-year-old high school freshman, of the murder of Mary Ann Stephens by a gunshot to the head through the bridge of her head. Since Brenton fit the description of the suspect according to Officer Martin and his partner, they approached Mr. Butler and asked questions regarding the shooting. The officers later asked victim’s husband, James Stephens, if Brenton was the man that shot his wife and being he was the only eyewitness, the officers arrested Mr. Butler. It is easier to wrongfully accuse as an African American male of a crime and that was the accusations put against Mr. Butler.

Read More
895 Words | 4 Pages

OUTLINE FOR DBQ ESSAY: HOW DEMOCRATIC WAS ANDREW JACKSON? I. INTRODUCTION (PARAGRAPH #1) A. Grabber sentence Democratic spirit began B. Background information about Andrew Jackson (use bullets here) Early life/Military Born on the border of North and South Carolina in 1767. He lost both of his parents by his teenage years and married Rachel Donelson.

Read More
1557 Words | 7 Pages

Dred Scott vs. Sanford case was the biggest mistake in U.S history, hands down. It is listed as the first case of the top ten worst Supreme Court decisions. Dred scotts case was the most significant because after his, no other case had ruined the reputation of the court quite as bad. This case was a huge deal, and is still an important subject to teach to students today. This case was said to be the case that started the civil war, although that may be an exaggeration.

Read More
933 Words | 4 Pages

Bethel Park is a small town in Western Pennsylvania about 25 minutes outside the city of Pittsburgh. The community is tightly knit and work together to make the community a better place. Recently, the citizens of Bethel Park have had conflicted opinions about moving the local magistrate building from inside the police station in the town to its own separate building still within the district lines. The new building is just outside a neighborhood in the town. The people of the community are worried that the move will cause criminals to be brought into their neighborhood and could disrupt the peace that the neighborhood is used to.

Read More
1009 Words | 5 Pages

As they face significant risks and liabilities in their line of work, personal liability protection is crucial to protect their personal assets. An LLC would provide this protection, while also allowing for flexibility in management and tax treatment, which is important given the unpredictable and constantly changing nature of their business. Moreover, an LLC would be relatively easy to set up and maintain compared to a corporation, which would require more formalities and regulations. This is important for the Winchester Brothers, as they are constantly on the move and may not have the time or resources to comply with extensive regulatory requirements.

Read More
467 Words | 2 Pages

In the case of Hopital Notre-Dame de l’Esperance et Theoret v. Laurent, the court specifically focused on the control test in identifying the employment status of a surgeon at the Notre-Dame Hospital. The court emphasized that the degree of control is essential in this classification, and put great importance on giving orders regarding how a worker performs his job. The honorable stated “the essential criterion of employer-employee relations is the right to give order and instructions to the employee regarding the manner in whichway to carry out his work” (p. 613). Since Uber is not in a position to be able of giving orders to its drivers, the workers cannot be classified as employees. The above case took place in Quebec which is governed with the Law

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

Generally we must examine litigation on a suit-to-suit

Read More
1550 Words | 7 Pages

In matters of confidentiality, Banking is risky due to the highly sensitive nature of information which is often exchanged, recorded and retained. The purpose of this article is to discuss the clash of confidentiality and disclosure in the banking sector across the globe. The Black’s Law Dictionary defines confidentiality as secrecy or the state of having the dissemination of certain information restricted. Breach of confidentiality, then, refers, to the violation of this trust that has been placed in another in a fiduciary relationship, in this case bank and their customers.

Read More

More about Wake Forest Law Case Summary

Related Topics

Open Document